1984 Yamaha IT 200 vs 2013 Honda CRF250R
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Comments | - | Model ID: CRF250R |
| Year | 1984 | - |
| Colours | - | Red |
| Make Model | Yamaha IT 200 | - |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | - | 323 mm |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | - | 12.7 inches |
| Seat Height | - | 950 mm / 37.4 in. |
| Wheelbase | - | 1,488 mm / 58.6 in. |
| Height | - | 1,171 mm / 46.1 in. |
| Length | - | 1,900 mm / 74.8 in. |
| Width | - | 770 mm / 30.3 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 95.7 kg / 211 lbs | - |
| Fuel Capacity | 11 Litres / 2.9 US gal | 5.68 litres / 1.50 gallons |
| Wet Weight | - | 103.0 kg / 227.0 lbs |
| Performance |
| Max Power | 26.6 hp @ 9500 rpm | - |
| Max Torque | 18.8 lb-ft @ 7500 rpm | 14.10 Nm (1.4 kgf-m or 10.4 ft.lbs) @ 11000 Revolutions |
| Engine |
| Fuel Control | - | SOHC |
| Engine Type | - | Single cylinder, four-stroke |
| Displacement (ci) | - | 15.19 cubic inches |
| Displacement (cc) | - | 249.00 cc |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | - | 76.8 x 53.8 mm |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | - | 3.0 x 2.1 inches |
| Displacement | 195 cc / 11.8 cu-in | - |
| Engine Detail | Two stroke, single cylinder, reed valve | - |
| Fuel System | - | Injection. Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI), 46mm throttle body |
| Bore x Stroke | 66 x 56mm | - |
| Compression Ratio | 8.4;1 | 13.2:1 |
| Cooling System | Air cooled | - |
| Emissions | - | Consult owners manual for optional racing parts. |
| Fuel Induction | 34mm Mikuni carburetor | - |
| Ignition | CDI | Full transistor with electronic advance |
| Spark Plug | Champion N86 | - |
| Starter | Kick | Kick |
| Valve System | - | 4 |
| Drivetrain |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | - | 5-speed |
| Primary Drive | - | #520 Chain; 13T/49T |
| Transmission / Drive | 6 Speed | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Semi-double cradle; steel tube |
| Suspension - Front | 43mm Kayaba forks | 48mm inverted Showa cartridge fork with 16-position rebound and 16-position compression damping adjustability |
| Suspension - Rear | Monoshock | Pro-Link® Showa single shock with spring preload, 17-position rebound damping adjustability, and compression-damping adjustment separated into low-speed (13 positions) and high-speed (3.5 turns); 12.3 inches travel |
| Rake | - | 27.0° |
| Trail | - | 118 mm / 4.6 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 275 mm / 12.2 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 282 mm / 11.1 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 9.4 inches |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 240 mm |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 9.4 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 240 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Drum | Double disc. Two-piston calipers. |
| Brakes - Rear | Drum | Single disc |
| Rims | - | Aluminium rim/wire spoke |
| Tyres - Front | 90/90 -21 | 80/100-21 |
| Tyres - Rear | 12/90 -18 | 100/90-19 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2013 Honda CRF250R
The 2013 Honda CRF250R edges out the 1984 Yamaha IT 200 thanks to its fuel injection and dual front discs. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
1984 Yamaha IT 200 - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 1984 Yamaha IT 200 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2013 Honda CRF250R - Advantages
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
- 💿Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
1984 Yamaha IT 200 vs 2013 Honda CRF250R - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1984 Yamaha IT 200 and 2013 Honda CRF250R?
The 1984 Yamaha IT 200 uses Two stroke, single cylinder, reed valve, while the 2013 Honda CRF250R is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke.
Which should I buy, the 1984 Yamaha IT 200 or the 2013 Honda CRF250R?
Both are strong choices. The 1984 Yamaha IT 200 has its own strengths, while the 2013 Honda CRF250R stands out for fuel injection and dual front discs. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.