2012 KTM 350 XCF-W vs 2013 Honda CRF250R

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2012 KTM 350 XCF-W 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Titanium valves
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
643.9 pounds
2013 Honda CRF250R 2013 Honda CRF250R

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
227.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Comments-Model ID: CRF250R
ColoursOrange/black/whiteRed
Warranty12 Months-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)345 mm323 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)13.6 inches12.7 inches
Seat Height970 mm / 38.2 in.950 mm / 37.4 in.
Wheelbase1,482 mm / 58.3 in.1,488 mm / 58.6 in.
Height1,146 mm / 45.1 in.1,171 mm / 46.1 in.
Length2,065 mm / 81.3 in.1,900 mm / 74.8 in.
Width1,204 mm / 47.4 in.770 mm / 30.3 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight107 kg / 235.9 lbs-
Fuel Capacity8.50 litres / 2.25 gallons5.68 litres / 1.50 gallons
Wet Weight292.1 kg / 643.9 lbs103.0 kg / 227.0 lbs
Performance
Maximum RPM12000-
Max Torque-14.10 Nm (1.4 kgf-m or 10.4 ft.lbs) @ 11000 Revolutions
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.5 x 2.3 inches3.0 x 2.1 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)88.0 x 57.5 mm76.8 x 53.8 mm
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Displacement (ci)21.34 cubic inches15.19 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)349.70 cc249.00 cc
Fuel ControlSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)SOHC
Engine DetailTitanium valves-
Fuel SystemInjectionInjection. Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI), 46mm throttle body
Compression Ratio13.2:113.2:1
Emissions-Consult owners manual for optional racing parts.
Engine LubricationPressure circulation lubrication with two Eaton pumps-
IgnitionContactless controlled fully electronic ignition with digital ignition adjustmentFull transistor with electronic advance
StarterElectric & kickKick
Valve System-4
Drivetrain
ClutchMultidisc clutch in oil bath/hydraulically activated-
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed5-speed
Primary DrivePrimary transmission 24:73 Final drive 13:52.#520 Chain; 13T/49T
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubingSemi-double cradle; steel tube
Suspension - FrontWP Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PA48mm inverted Showa cartridge fork with 16-position rebound and 16-position compression damping adjustability
Suspension - RearWPSuspension PDS 5018 DCCPro-Link® Showa single shock with spring preload, 17-position rebound damping adjustability, and compression-damping adjustment separated into low-speed (13 positions) and high-speed (3.5 turns); 12.3 inches travel
Rake26.5°27.0°
Trail-118 mm / 4.6 in.
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in.275 mm / 12.2 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear335 mm / 13.2 in.282 mm / 11.1 in.
Electrical Systems
Lighting system30W x 2 halogen-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.2 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm240 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)260 mm240 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - FrontSingle discDouble disc. Two-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc
RimsExcel AL7 rims with silver anodized stripes,Aluminium rim/wire spoke
Tyres - Front80/100-2180/100-21
Tyres - Rear100/90-19100/90-19

Verdict

Winner on specs

2012 KTM 350 XCF-W

The 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W edges out the 2013 Honda CRF250R thanks to its greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2012 KTM 350 XCF-W - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 345 mm vs 323 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 282 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 275 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 Honda CRF250R - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 950 mm vs 970 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2012 KTM 350 XCF-W vs 2013 Honda CRF250R - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W or the 2013 Honda CRF250R?
The 2013 Honda CRF250R has the lower seat at 950 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W sits higher at 970 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W or the 2013 Honda CRF250R?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2013 Honda CRF250R stands out for lower seat height and dual front discs. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.