2010 Honda CBF 600S vs 2009 Ducati Monster 696

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2010 Honda CBF 600S 2010 Honda CBF 600S

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
76.4 hp / 57 kW @ 10500 rpm
Top Speed
202.4 km/h / 125.8 mph
Weight
489.4 pounds
2009 Ducati Monster 696 2009 Ducati Monster 696

Naked bike

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
354.9 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year2010 - 11-
ColoursPearl Cool White/Black, Pearl Siena Red/Black, Dragon Green Metallic/Black, Pearl Nightstar BlackRed (red/black), Matte Black (black/black), White (black/black)
Make ModelHonda CBF 600S-
Dimensions
Seat Height785 mm / 30.9 in770 mm / 30.3 in.
Wheelbase1490 mm / 58.7 in1,450 mm / 57.1 in.
Ground Clearance130 mm /5.1 in-
Height1240 mm / 48.8 in-
Length2160 mm / 85.0 in-
Width765 mm / 30.1 in-
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight222 kg / 489.4 lbs161 kg / 354.9 lbs
Fuel Capacity20 Liters / 5.2 US gal15.00 litres / 3.96 gallons
Performance
Top Speed202.4 km/h / 125.8 mph-
Max Power76.4 hp / 57 kW @ 10500 rpm-
Max Torque58 Nm / 42.7 lb-ft @ 8000 rpm50.60 Nm (5.2 kgf-m or 37.3 ft.lbs)
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.3443 HP/kg0.4898 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.8 sec-
Engine
Fuel ControlDOHCDesmodromic valve control
Engine TypeIn-line four, four-strokeV2, four-stroke
Bore x Stroke (in,)-3.5 x 2.3 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)-88.0 x 57.2 mm
Displacement (cc)-696.00 cc
Displacement (ci)-42.47 cubic inches
Displacement599 cc / 36.5 cu-in-
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.-
Fuel SystemInjection. PGM-FI electronic fuel injectionInjection. Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle body
Bore x Stroke65 x 45.2 mm-
Compression Ratio11.6:110.7:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooled-
Exhaust-2 aluminium mufflers
Fuel Consumption20.0 km/lit-
Fuel InductionElectronic fuel injection 32mm throttle body-
IgnitionComputer-controlled digital transistorized -
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System42
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multiplate with coil springsAPTC wet multiplate with hydraulic control
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox-6-speed
Transmission / Drive6 Speed-
Chassis
Frame TypeMono-backbone; gravity die-cast aluminiumTubular steel trellis frame
Suspension - Front41mm telescopic forkShowa 43mm upside-down forks
Suspension - RearMonoshock damper with 7-step adjustable preloadProgressive linkage with preload and rebound Sachs adjustable monoshock
Rake26.0°24.0°
Trail110 mm / 4.3 in.-
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in120 mm / 4.7 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear125 mm / 4.9 in148 mm / 5.8 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)-320 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)-12.6 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)-9.6 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)-245 mm
Brakes - Front2x 296mm discs 2 piston calipers (ABS)Double disc
Brakes - RearSingle 240mm disc 1 piston caliper (ABS)Single disc
Tyres - Front120/70 ZR17120/60-ZR17
Tyres - Rear160/60 ZR17160/60-ZR17
WheelsU-section twin 6-spoke cast aluminium-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2009 Ducati Monster 696

The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 edges out the 2010 Honda CBF 600S thanks to its lighter kerb weight, dual front discs and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2010 Honda CBF 600S - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.

2009 Ducati Monster 696 - Advantages

  • Lighter: 161 kg vs 222 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More rear wheel travel: 148 mm vs 125 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2010 Honda CBF 600S vs 2009 Ducati Monster 696 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2010 Honda CBF 600S and 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2010 Honda CBF 600S uses In-line four, four-stroke, while the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is powered by V2, four-stroke.
Which is lighter, the 2010 Honda CBF 600S or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 222 kg for the 2010 Honda CBF 600S - a difference of 61 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2010 Honda CBF 600S or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 has the lower seat at 770 mm, making it more accessible. The 2010 Honda CBF 600S sits higher at 785 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2010 Honda CBF 600S or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
Both are strong choices. The 2010 Honda CBF 600S has the edge in liquid cooling, while the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 stands out for lighter kerb weight and dual front discs. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.