2009 Ducati Monster 696 vs 2011 Honda CBF 600S vs 2011 Honda CBF 600S

Full specifications comparison • 3 motorcycles

Comparing 3 motorcycles
2009 Ducati Monster 696 2009 Ducati Monster 696

Naked bike

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
354.9 pounds
2011 Honda CBF 600S 2011 Honda CBF 600S

All-Round

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
480.6 pounds
2011 Honda CBF 600S 2011 Honda CBF 600S

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
76.4 hp / 57 kW @ 10500 rpm
Top Speed
202.4 km/h / 125.8 mph
Weight
489.4 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year-2010 - 11
ColoursRed (red/black), Matte Black (black/black), White (black/black)Pearl Cool White/Black, Pearl Siena Red/Black, Dragon Green Metallic/Black, Pearl Nightstar Black
Make Model-Honda CBF 600S
Dimensions
Seat Heigth -Alternate (mm)-800 mm
Seat Heigth -Alternate (in.)-31.5 inches
Ground Clearance (in.)-5.1 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)-130 mm
Seat Height770 mm / 30.3 in.785 mm / 30.9 in
Wheelbase1,450 mm / 57.1 in.1490 mm / 58.7 in
Ground Clearance-130 mm /5.1 in
Height-1240 mm / 48.8 in
Length-2,160 mm / 85.0 in.
Width-765 mm / 30.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight161 kg / 354.9 lbs218 kg / 480.6 lbs
Fuel Capacity15.00 litres / 3.96 gallons20.00 litres / 5.28 gallons
Performance
Mods from previous model-Also called USHighland 507 ATX QuadRacer.
Top Speed-202.4 km/h / 125.8 mph
Max Power-76.4 hp / 57 kW @ 10500 rpm
Max Torque50.60 Nm (5.2 kgf-m or 37.3 ft.lbs)59.00 Nm (6.0 kgf-m or 43.5 ft.lbs) @ 8250
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.4898 HP/kg0.3443 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile-12.8 sec
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.5 x 2.3 inches2.6 x 1.7 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)88.0 x 57.2 mm67.0 x 42.5 mm
Displacement (cc)696.00 cc599.30 cc
Displacement (ci)42.47 cubic inches36.57 cubic inches
Engine TypeV2, four-strokeIn-line four, four-stroke
Fuel ControlDesmodromic valve controlDOHC
Displacement-599 cc / 36.5 cu-in
Engine Detail-Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Fuel SystemInjection. Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle bodyInjection
Bore x Stroke-65 x 45.2 mm
Compression Ratio10.7:111.6:1
Cooling System-Liquid cooled
Exhaust2 aluminium mufflers-
Fuel Consumption-20.0 km/lit
Fuel Induction-Electronic fuel injection 32mm throttle body
Fuel Reserve-4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons
Ignition-Computer-controlled digital transistorised with electronic advance
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System24
Drivetrain
ClutchAPTC wet multiplate with hydraulic controlWet, multiplate
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary Drive-O-ring Sealed chain
Transmission / Drive-6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel trellis frameAluminium
Suspension - FrontShowa 43mm upside-down forks41mm telescopic fork, 120mm axle travel
Suspension - RearProgressive linkage with preload and rebound Sachs adjustable monoshockMonoshock damper with 7-step adjustable preload
Rake24.0°26.0°
Trail-110 mm / 4.3 in.
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in.300 mm / 11.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear148 mm / 5.8 in.125 mm / 4.9 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)245 mm240 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.6 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm296 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches11.7 inches
Brakes - FrontDouble discDouble disc
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle 240mm disc 1 piston caliper (ABS)
Rims-U-section twin 6-spoke cast aluminium
Tyres - Front120/60-ZR17120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear160/60-ZR17160/60 ZR17
Wheels-U-section twin 6-spoke cast aluminium

Verdict

Winner on specs

2009 Ducati Monster 696

The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 edges out the 2011 Honda CBF 600S thanks to its lighter kerb weight, dual front discs and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2009 Ducati Monster 696 - Advantages

  • Lighter: 161 kg vs 218 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More rear wheel travel: 148 mm vs 125 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2011 Honda CBF 600S - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.

2009 Ducati Monster 696 vs 2011 Honda CBF 600S - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 and 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 uses V2, four-stroke, while the 2011 Honda CBF 600S is powered by In-line four, four-stroke.
Which is lighter, the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 or the 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 218 kg for the 2011 Honda CBF 600S - a difference of 57 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which should I buy, the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 or the 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
Both are strong choices. The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 has the edge in lighter kerb weight and dual front discs, while the 2011 Honda CBF 600S stands out for liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.