1984 Yamaha IT 200 vs 2013 Honda CRF 250L
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Comments | - | Model ID: CRF150RB |
| Year | 1984 | - |
| Colours | - | Red/white |
| Make Model | Yamaha IT 200 | - |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | - | 10.0 inches |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | - | 255 mm |
| Seat Height | - | 875 mm / 34.4 in. |
| Wheelbase | - | 1,445 mm / 56.9 in. |
| Height | - | 1,195 mm / 47.0 in. |
| Length | - | 2,195 mm / 86.4 in. |
| Width | - | 815 mm / 32.1 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Oil Capacity (l) | - | 1.80 litres |
| Oil Capacity (Quarts) | - | 0.12 quarts |
| Dry Weight | 95.7 kg / 211 lbs | - |
| Fuel Capacity | 11 Litres / 2.9 US gal | 7.70 litres / 2.03 gallons |
| Wet Weight | - | 144.0 kg / 317.5 lbs |
| Performance |
| Max Power | 26.6 hp @ 9500 rpm | - |
| Max Torque | 18.8 lb-ft @ 7500 rpm | 22.00 Nm (2.2 kgf-m or 16.2 ft.lbs) @ 7000 |
| Engine |
| Displacement (cc) | - | 250.00 cc |
| CO2 | - | 72.4 CO |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | - | 76.0 x 55.0 mm |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | - | 3.0 x 2.2 inches |
| Engine Type | - | Single cylinder, four-stroke |
| Fuel Control | - | DOHC |
| Displacement (ci) | - | 15.26 cubic inches |
| Displacement | 195 cc / 11.8 cu-in | - |
| Engine Detail | Two stroke, single cylinder, reed valve | - |
| Fuel System | - | Injection. Programmed fuel injection system (PGM-FI) |
| Bore x Stroke | 66 x 56mm | - |
| Compression Ratio | 8.4;1 | 10.7:1 |
| Cooling System | Air cooled | - |
| Emissions | - | Consult owners manual for optional racing parts. |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 3.12 litres/100 km (32.1 km/l or 75.39 mpg) |
| Fuel Induction | 34mm Mikuni carburetor | - |
| Ignition | CDI | Full-transistor battery ignition |
| Spark Plug | Champion N86 | - |
| Starter | Kick | Electric |
| Valve System | - | 4 |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Wet multiplate with coil springs |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | - | 6-speed |
| Primary Drive | - | Constant mesh |
| Transmission / Drive | 6 Speed | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Semi-double cradle. Swing arm: Rear wheel travel. |
| Suspension - Front | 43mm Kayaba forks | Telescopic (Inverted) 43mm diameter slide pipe |
| Suspension - Rear | Monoshock | Swing arm (Pro-link suspension system) 40mm diameter cylinder |
| Rake | - | 27.0° |
| Trail | - | 113 mm / 4.4 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 61 mm / 2.4 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 282 mm / 11.1 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 256 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 8.7 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 10.1 inches |
| Brakes - Front | Drum | Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Brakes - Rear | Drum | Single disc. Hydraulic. Single-piston caliper. |
| Rims | - | Brakes Front |
| Tyres - Front | 90/90 -21 | 3.00-21 |
| Tyres - Rear | 12/90 -18 | 120/80-P18 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2013 Honda CRF 250L
The 2013 Honda CRF 250L edges out the 1984 Yamaha IT 200 thanks to its fuel injection. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
1984 Yamaha IT 200 - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 1984 Yamaha IT 200 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2013 Honda CRF 250L - Advantages
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
1984 Yamaha IT 200 vs 2013 Honda CRF 250L - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1984 Yamaha IT 200 and 2013 Honda CRF 250L?
The 1984 Yamaha IT 200 uses Two stroke, single cylinder, reed valve, while the 2013 Honda CRF 250L is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke.
Which should I buy, the 1984 Yamaha IT 200 or the 2013 Honda CRF 250L?
Both are strong choices. The 1984 Yamaha IT 200 has its own strengths, while the 2013 Honda CRF 250L stands out for fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.