2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS vs 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS 2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS

Sport touring

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
652.6 pounds
2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX

Sport touring

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
507.1 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsWindshield.-
ColoursBronze, blackBlack, green/black
Warranty1 year / 5000 miles limited warranty.-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)5.1 inches5.3 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)130 mm135 mm
Seat Height805 mm / 31.7 in.820 mm / 32.3 in.
Wheelbase1,544 mm / 60.8 in.1,445 mm / 56.9 in.
Height1,326 mm / 52.2 in.1,170 mm / 46.1 in.
Length2,230 mm / 87.8 in.2,105 mm / 82.9 in.
Width749 mm / 29.5 in.790 mm / 31.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)4.90 litres-
Oil Capacity (Quarts)0.32 quarts-
Dry Weight210.5 kg / 464.1 lbs-
Fuel Capacity24.98 litres / 6.60 gallons19.00 litres / 5.02 gallons
Wet Weight296.0 kg / 652.6 lbs230.0 kg / 507.1 lbs
Performance
Max Torque138.00 Nm (14.1 kgf-m or 101.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000111.00 Nm (11.3 kgf-m or 81.9 ft.lbs) @ 11300
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.1143 HP/kg-
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.1 x 2.6 inches3.0 x 2.2 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)79.0 x 66.2 mm77.0 x 56.0 mm
CO2151.5 CO-
Displacement (cc)1298.00 cc1043.00 cc
Displacement (ci)79.20 cubic inches63.64 cubic inches
Engine TypeIn-line four, four-strokeV2, four-stroke
Fuel ControlDOHCDOHC
Engine Detail-Reed valve.
Fuel SystemInjectionInjection
Compression Ratio10.8:111.8:1
Engine Lubrication-Forced lubrication, wet sump
Fuel Consumption6.53 litres/100 km (15.3 km/l or 36.02 mpg)-
IgnitionTCI: Transistor Controlled IgnitionDigital
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44
Drivetrain
Clutch-Wet multi-disc, manual
Final DriveShaft drive (cardan)Chain
Gearbox5-speed-
Primary DriveConstant meshSealed chain
Chassis
Frame TypeAluminium, Diamond ShapedAluminium twin-tube
Suspension - FrontUpside-down telescopic fork, ? 48 mm tube, adjustable preload, compression and rebound damping41 mm inverted fork with stepless compression and rebound damping and spring preload adjustability
Suspension - RearLinked monoshock with spring preload adjustmentHorizontal Back-link, gas-charged, with stepless rebound damping and remote spring preload adjustability
Rake26.0°24.5°
Seat2-person seat-
Trail109 mm / 4.3 in.102 mm / 4.0 in.
Wheel Travel - Front135 mm / 5.3 in.-
Wheel Travel - Rear125 mm / 4.9 in.-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm300 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches11.8 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)282 mm250 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)11.1 inches9.8 inches
Brakes - FrontDouble disc. HydraulicDouble disc. Floating discs.
Brakes - RearSingle disc. HydraulicSingle disc
Tyres - Front120/70-ZR17120/70-ZR17
Tyres - Rear180/55-ZR17190/50-ZR17

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS and the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS vs 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS and 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX?
The 2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS uses In-line four, four-stroke, while the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX is powered by V2, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS or the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX?
The 2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS has the lower seat at 805 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX sits higher at 820 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS or the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Yamaha FJR1300AS has its own strengths, while the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.