2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A vs 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A 2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A

Sport touring

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
145 hp / 105.7 kW @ 8500 rpm
Top Speed
244.9 km/h / 152.1 mph
Weight
637.0 pounds
2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX

Sport touring

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
507.1 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsWindshield-
Year2013-
ColoursStone GrayBlack, green/black
Make ModelYamaha FJR 1300A-
Warranty1 Year (Limited Factory Warranty)-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)130 mm135 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)5.1 inches5.3 inches
Seat Height805 mm - 825.5 mm / 31.7 in - 32.5 in.820 mm / 32.3 in.
Wheelbase1544.3 mm / 60.8 in1,445 mm / 56.9 in.
Ground Clearance130 mm / 5.1 in.-
Height1455 mm / 57.3 in.1,170 mm / 46.1 in.
Length2230 mm / 87.8 in.2,105 mm / 82.9 in.
Width749.3 mm / 29.5 in.790 mm / 31.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight264 kg / 582 lbs-
Fuel Capacity25 Liters / 6.6 US gal19.00 litres / 5.02 gallons
Wet Weight292 kg / 644 lbs230.0 kg / 507.1 lbs
Performance
Top Speed244.9 km/h / 152.1 mph-
Max Power145 hp / 105.7 kW @ 8500 rpm-
Max Torque125 Nm / 13.7kgf-m @ 6000 rpm111.00 Nm (11.3 kgf-m or 81.9 ft.lbs) @ 11300
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.1143 HP/kg-
Standing Start ¼ Mile11.4 sec-
Engine
Displacement (cc)-1043.00 cc
Displacement (ci)-63.64 cubic inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)-77.0 x 56.0 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)-3.0 x 2.2 inches
Engine TypeIn-line four, four-strokeV2, four-stroke
Fuel ControlDOHCDOHC
CO2151.5 CO-
Displacement1298 cc / 79.2 cu-in-
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.Reed valve.
Fuel SystemInjectionInjection
Bore x Stroke79 x 66.2 mm-
Compression Ratio10.8:111.8:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooled-
Engine Lubrication-Forced lubrication, wet sump
Engine Oil SpecificationSynthetic, 20W/40-
Fuel Consumption6.53 litres/100 km (15.3 km/l or 36.02 mpg)-
Fuel InductionElectronic Fuel Injection-
IgnitionTCI (Transistor Controlled Ignition)Digital
LubricationWet sump-
Spark PlugNGK, CR8E-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multiple discs, hydraulic operatedWet multi-disc, manual
Final DriveShaftChain
Gearbox5-speed-
Primary Drive-Sealed chain
Transmission / Drive5 Speed -
Chassis
Frame TypeAluminium, twin sparAluminium twin-tube
Suspension - Front48mm upside-down telescopic fork w/adjustable preload, compression and rebound damping;41 mm inverted fork with stepless compression and rebound damping and spring preload adjustability
Suspension - RearSingle shock, link-type, w/adjustable preload and rebound damping;Horizontal Back-link, gas-charged, with stepless rebound damping and remote spring preload adjustability
Rake26.0°24.5°
Seat2-person seat-
Trail102 mm / 4.3 in.102 mm / 4.0 in.
Wheel Travel - Front137 mm / 5.3 in-
Wheel Travel - Rear129 mm / 4.9 in-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)282 mm250 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches11.8 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm300 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)11.1 inches9.8 inches
Brakes - Front2x 320mm discs 4 piston calipersDouble disc. Floating discs.
Brakes - RearSingle 283mm disc 2 piston caliperSingle disc
Tyres - Front120/70 ZR17120/70-ZR17
Tyres - Rear180/55 ZR17190/50-ZR17

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A and the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.

2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX - Advantages

  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A vs 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A and 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX?
The 2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A uses In-line four, four-stroke, while the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX is powered by V2, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A or the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX?
The 2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A has the lower seat at 805 mm - 825.5 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX sits higher at 820 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A or the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Yamaha FJR 1300A has the edge in liquid cooling, while the 2014 Kawasaki Z 1000SX stands out for dual front discs. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.