2008 Victory Hammer vs 2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | 2007 - 08 | 2009 - 10 |
| Make Model | Victory Hammer | Victory Vegas 8 Ball |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | 660 mm / 26 in | 640 mm / 25.2 i |
| Wheelbase | 1669 mm / 65.7 in | - |
| Ground Clearance | 135 mm / 5.3 in | - |
| Length | 2366 mm / 93.1 in | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 305 kg / 672 lbs | 291 kg / 645 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 17 Litres / 4.5 US gal | 17 Litres / 4.5 US gal |
| Maximum Load / GVWR | - | 522 kg / 151 lbs |
| Engine |
| Displacement | 1634 cc / 100 cu-in | 1634 cc / 100 cu-in |
| Engine Detail | Four stroke, 50° V twin SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder | Four stroke, 50° V twin SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder |
| Bore x Stroke | 101 x 102 mm | 101 x 102 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Cooling System | Air / oil | Air / oil |
| Fuel Induction | Electronic Fuel Injection with 44mm throttle bodies | Electronic Fuel Injection with 44mm throttle bodies |
| Starter | Electric | Electric |
| EV Specifics |
| Battery Capacity | 12 volts / 18 amp hours | 12 volts / 18 amp hours |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet, multi-plate | Wet, multi-plate |
| Final Drive | Carbon Fiber Reinforced Belt | Carbon Fiber Reinforced Belt |
| Transmission / Drive | 6 Speed | 6 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Suspension - Front | 43mm Inverted cartridge telescopic fork | 43mm Inverted cartridge telescopic fork, 130mm wheel travel |
| Suspension - Rear | Single, mono-tube gas forged and cast aluminum w/ rising-rate linkage | Single, mono-tube gas forged and cast aluminum w/ rising-rate linkage 100mm wheel travel, preload adjustable spring |
| Rake | 32.7° | - |
| Trail | 140 mm / 5.5 in | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 130 mm / 5.1 in | - |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 100 mm / 3.9 in | - |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | 2x 300mm floating rotor 4 piston caliper | Single 300mm floating rotor 4 piston caliper |
| Brakes - Rear | Single 300mm floating rotor 2 piston caliper | Single 300mm floating rotor 2 piston caliper |
| Tyres - Front | 130/70 R18 | 80/90 -21 |
| Tyres - Rear | 250/40 R18 | 180/55 R18 |
| Wheels - Front | 18 x 3.5 in | - |
| Wheels - Rear | 18 x 8.5 in | - |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball
The 2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball edges out the 2008 Victory Hammer thanks to its lower seat height. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2008 Victory Hammer - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 2008 Victory Hammer matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 640 mm vs 660 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2008 Victory Hammer vs 2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball - FAQs
Which is lighter, the 2008 Victory Hammer or the 2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball?
The 2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball is lighter at 291 kg compared to 305 kg for the 2008 Victory Hammer - a difference of 14 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2008 Victory Hammer or the 2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball?
The 2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball has the lower seat at 640 mm, making it more accessible. The 2008 Victory Hammer sits higher at 660 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2008 Victory Hammer or the 2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball?
Both are strong choices. The 2008 Victory Hammer has its own strengths, while the 2010 Victory Vegas 8 Ball stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.