2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC vs 2011 Honda CBF 600S vs 2011 Honda CBF 600S

Full specifications comparison • 3 motorcycles

Comparing 3 motorcycles
2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC

All-Round

Engine
In-line three, four-stroke
Power
69.1 kW / 93.9 hp @ 9300 rpm
Top Speed
196.3 km/h / 122 mph
Weight
474.0 pounds
2011 Honda CBF 600S 2011 Honda CBF 600S

All-Round

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
480.6 pounds
2011 Honda CBF 600S 2011 Honda CBF 600S

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
76.4 hp / 57 kW @ 10500 rpm
Top Speed
202.4 km/h / 125.8 mph
Weight
489.4 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Comments4W/2WD. Automatic Transmission with Hi/Lo Range and Reverse. Slip Limited Front Differential. DC 12V 10A 120W electric outlet. Made in Taiwan.-
Year20122010 - 11
ColoursPhantom Black. Crystal White. Intense OrangeBlack, red/black, white/black, gold/black
Make ModelTriumph Tiger 800 XCHonda CBF 600S
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)-130 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)-5.1 inches
Seat Heigth -Alternate (in.)-31.5 inches
Seat Heigth -Alternate (mm)-800 mm
Seat Height810 mm -830 mm / 31.9"- 32.7" adjustable770 mm / 30.3 in.
Wheelbase1530 mm / 60.2"1,490 mm / 58.7 in.
Ground Clearance-130 mm /5.1 in
Height1350 mm / 53.1"1,240 mm / 48.8 in.
Length2215 mm / 87.1"2,160 mm / 85.0 in.
Width795 mm / 31.3"765 mm / 30.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight364 kg / 802.5 lbs218 kg / 480.6 lbs
Fuel Capacity18.9 Litres / 5.0 US gal / 4.2 Imp gal20.00 litres / 5.28 gallons
Wet Weight214.5 kg / 473 lbs-
Performance
Mods from previous model-Also called USHighland 507 ATX QuadRacer.
Top Speed196.3 km/h / 122 mph202.4 km/h / 125.8 mph
Max Power69.1 kW / 93.9 hp @ 9300 rpm76.4 hp / 57 kW @ 10500 rpm
Max Torque79 Nm / 8.1 kgf-m / 58 ft.lb @ 7850 rpm59.00 Nm (6.0 kgf-m or 43.5 ft.lbs) @ 8250
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.0541 HP/kg0.3506 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.2 sec12.8 sec
Engine
Bore x Stroke (mm)-67.0 x 42.5 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)-2.6 x 1.7 inches
CO2133.2 CO-
Displacement (cc)-599.30 cc
Engine TypeIn-line three, four-strokeIn-line four, four-stroke
Fuel ControlDOHCDOHC
Displacement (ci)-36.57 cubic inches
Displacement799 cc / 48.7 cu-in599 cc / 36.5 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse three cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Fuel SystemInjection. Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection with SAIInjection
Bore x Stroke74 x 61.9 mm65 x 45.2 mm
Compression Ratio12.0:111.6:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
ExhaustStainless Steel, 3 into 1, high-level exhaust-
Fuel Consumption5.3 L/100 km / 18.8 km/l / 44.2 US mpg / 53 Imp mpg20.0 km/lit
Fuel InductionMultipoint sequential electronic fuel injectionElectronic fuel injection 32mm throttle body
Fuel Reserve-4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons
IgnitionDigital CDIComputer-controlled digital transistorised with electronic advance
LubricationWet sump-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-plateWet, multiplate with coil springs
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary DriveX ring chain. Primary drive: Gear.O-ring Sealed chain
Transmission / Drive6 Speed6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel trellis frame, twin-sided swingarmAluminium
Suspension - FrontShowa 45mm upside down forks41mm telescopic fork, 120mm axle travel
Suspension - RearShowa monoshock with remote oil reservoir, hydraulically adjustable preload, rebound damping adjustmentMonoshock damper with 7-step adjustable preload, 125mm axle travel
Rake23.9°26.0°
Trail92.4mm / 3.6"110 mm / 4.3 in.
Wheel Travel - Front220 mm / 8.7"300 mm / 11.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear215 mm / 8.5"125 mm / 4.9 in
Electrical Systems
InstrumentationLCD multi-functional instrument pack with digital speedometer, trip computer, analogue tachometer, gear position indicator, fuel gauge, service indicator, TPMS ready, switchable ABS and clock-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.1 inches11.7 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)255 mm240 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.0 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)308 mm296 mm
Brakes - Front2 x 308mm floating discs, Nissin 2-piston floating caliber (Switchable ABS available), Nissin front brake master cylinder, 14mm diameterDouble disc
Brakes - RearSingle 255mm disc, Nissin single-piston floating caliber (Switchable ABS available)Single disc
RimsAluminum rimU-section twin 6-spoke cast aluminium
Tyres - Front90/90 ZR21120/70-ZR17
Tyres - Rear150/70 ZR17160/60-ZR17
Wheels-U-section twin 6-spoke cast aluminium
Wheels - Front2.50 x 21" Cast aluminium rim, 36 spoke-
Wheels - Rear4.25 x 17" Cast aluminium rim, 32 spoke-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC

The 2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC edges out the 2011 Honda CBF 600S thanks to its higher torque, dual front discs, higher rear wheel travel, higher front wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 79 Nm vs 58 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • Larger displacement: 799 cc vs 599 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More rear wheel travel: 215 mm vs 125 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 220 mm vs 120 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2011 Honda CBF 600S - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 785 mm vs 810 mm -830 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC vs 2011 Honda CBF 600S - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC and 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
The 2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC uses In-line three, four-stroke, while the 2011 Honda CBF 600S is powered by In-line four, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
The 2011 Honda CBF 600S has the lower seat at 785 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC sits higher at 810 mm -830 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC or the 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 Triumph Tiger 800 XC has the edge in higher torque and dual front discs, while the 2011 Honda CBF 600S stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.