MotoSpecs

2013 Triumph Bonneville vs 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 Triumph Bonneville 2013 Triumph Bonneville

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
49 kW / 66 hp @ 7250 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
225 kg / 495 lbs
2014 Kawasaki ER-6f 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, parallel twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Power
53 kW / 72.1 hp @ 8500 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
209 kg / 460 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year20132014
Make ModelTriumph BonnevilleKawasaki ER-6f
Dimensions
Seat Height739 mm / 29.1 in805 mm / 31.7 in
Wheelbase1488 mm / 58.6 in1410 mm / 55.5 in
Ground Clearance-130 mm / 5.1 in
Height1130 mm / 44.5 in1210 mm / 47.6 in
Length2113 mm / 83.2 in2105 mm / 82.9 in
Width840 mm / 33.1 in760 mm / 29.9 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight205 kg / 451 lbs-
Fuel Capacity16.0 Litres / 4.2 US gal / 3.5 Imp gal16 Litres / 4.2 US gal
Wet Weight225 kg / 495 lbs209 kg / 460 lbs
Performance
Max Power49 kW / 66 hp @ 7250 rpm53 kW / 72.1 hp @ 8500 rpm
Max Torque71 Nm / 7.24 kgf-m / 52 ft-lb @ 6000 rpm66 Nm / 6.7 m-kg @ 7000 rpm
Engine
Displacement865 cc / 52.8 cu in649 cc / 39.6 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, parallel twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Bore x Stroke90 x 68 mm83 X 60mm
Compression Ratio9.2:111.3;1
Cooling SystemAir-cooledLiquid cooled,
Engine Oil SpecificationSynthetic, 15W/50Synthetic, 10-40
Fuel InductionMultipoint Sequential Fuel injection2x 38mm Electronic Fuel Injection Keihin
IgnitionDigital Digital TCBI
LubricationWet sumpWet sump
Spark Plug-NGK, CR9EIA-9
Starter-Electric
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi plateWet, multiple discs, cable operated
Final DriveChain, X-ring-
Gear Ratios-1st 2.438 (39/16) 2nd 1.714 (36/21) 3rd 1.333 (32/24) 4th 1.111 (30/27) 5th 0.966 (28/29) 6th 0.852 (23/27)
Transmission / Drive5 Speed 6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel cradle, swing arm: twin-sided, tubular steelPerimeter, high-tensile steel
Suspension - Front41mm Kayaba telescopic forks41 mm telescopic fork
Suspension - RearKayaba chrome spring twin shocks with adjustable preloadOffset laydown single-shock with adjustable preload
Rake26°25°
Trail106 mm / 4.2 in106 mm / 4.1 in
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear106 mm / 4.17 in130 mm / 5.1 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - FrontSingle 310 mm disc, 2 piston Nissen floating calipers2x 300mm discs 2 piston Calipers
Brakes - Rear-Single 220mm disc 1 piston Caliper
Tyres - Front100/70 R17120/70ZR17
Tyres - Rear130/80 R17160/60ZR17
Wheels - FrontCast aluminium alloy, 7 spokes, 17 x 3.0 in-
Wheels - RearCast aluminium alloy, 7spokes, 17 x 3.5 in-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2014 Kawasaki ER-6f

The 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f edges out the 2013 Triumph Bonneville thanks to its more peak power, lighter kerb weight, liquid cooling and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 Triumph Bonneville - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 71 Nm vs 66 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Lower seat height: 739 mm vs 805 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Larger displacement: 865 cc vs 649 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.

2014 Kawasaki ER-6f - Advantages

  • More power: Produces 53 kW vs 49 kW - a meaningful performance advantage.
  • Lighter: 209 kg vs 225 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • More rear wheel travel: 130 mm vs 106 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2013 Triumph Bonneville vs 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Triumph Bonneville and 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f?
The 2013 Triumph Bonneville uses Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder, while the 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f is powered by Four stroke, parallel twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder..
Which is lighter, the 2013 Triumph Bonneville or the 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f?
The 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f is lighter at 209 kg compared to 225 kg for the 2013 Triumph Bonneville - a difference of 16 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which has more power, the 2013 Triumph Bonneville or the 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f?
The 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f produces more peak power at 53 kW, compared to 49 kW for the 2013 Triumph Bonneville.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Triumph Bonneville or the 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f?
The 2013 Triumph Bonneville has the lower seat at 739 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f sits higher at 805 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Triumph Bonneville or the 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Triumph Bonneville has the edge in higher torque and lower seat height, while the 2014 Kawasaki ER-6f stands out for more peak power and lighter kerb weight. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Triumph Bonneville years All Kawasaki ER-6f years
Build your own comparison →