MotoSpecs

2000 Suzuki SV 650 vs 2011 Honda CBF 600S vs 2011 Honda CBF 600S

Full specifications comparison • 3 motorcycles

Comparing 3 motorcycles
2000 Suzuki SV 650 2000 Suzuki SV 650

Naked bike

Engine
V2
Power
N/A
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Weight
372.6 pounds
2011 Honda CBF 600S 2011 Honda CBF 600S

All-Round

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
480.6 pounds
2011 Honda CBF 600S 2011 Honda CBF 600S

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
76.4 hp / 57 kW @ 10500 rpm
Top Speed
202.4 km/h / 125.8 mph
Weight
489.4 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year-2010 - 11
ColoursYellow, bluePearl Cool White/Black, Pearl Siena Red/Black, Dragon Green Metallic/Black, Pearl Nightstar Black
Make Model-Honda CBF 600S
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)-130 mm
Seat Heigth -Alternate (in.)-31.5 inches
Seat Heigth -Alternate (mm)-800 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)-5.1 inches
Seat Height805 mm / 31.7 in.785 mm / 30.9 in
Wheelbase1,420 mm / 55.9 in.1490 mm / 58.7 in
Ground Clearance-130 mm /5.1 in
Height-1240 mm / 48.8 in
Length-2160 mm / 85.0 in
Width-765 mm / 30.1 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight169 kg / 372.6 lbs218 kg / 480.6 lbs
Fuel Capacity16.00 litres / 4.23 gallons20.00 litres / 5.28 gallons
Performance
Mods from previous model-Also called USHighland 507 ATX QuadRacer.
Top Speed200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph202.4 km/h / 125.8 mph
Max Power-76.4 hp / 57 kW @ 10500 rpm
Max Torque62.0059.00 Nm (6.0 kgf-m or 43.5 ft.lbs) @ 8250
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.4142 HP/kg0.3443 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile-12.8 sec
Engine
Fuel Control-DOHC
Bore x Stroke (in,)-2.6 x 1.7 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)-67.0 x 42.5 mm
Stroke4-
Engine TypeV2In-line four, four-stroke
Displacement (ci)39.91 cubic inches36.57 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)654.00 cc599.30 cc
Displacement-599 cc / 36.5 cu-in
Engine Detail-Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Fuel System-Injection. PGM-FI electronic fuel injection
Bore x Stroke-65 x 45.2 mm
Compression Ratio-11.6:1
Cooling System-Liquid cooled
Fuel Consumption-20.0 km/lit
Fuel Induction-Electronic fuel injection 32mm throttle body
Fuel Reserve-4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons
Ignition-Computer-controlled digital transistorised with electronic advance
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System-4
Drivetrain
Clutch-Wet, multiplate
Final Drive-Chain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary Drive-O-ring Sealed chain
Transmission / Drive-6 Speed
Chassis
Frame Type-Aluminium
Suspension - Front-41mm telescopic fork, 120mm axle travel
Suspension - Rear-Monoshock damper with 7-step adjustable preload, 125mm axle travel
Rake-26.0°
Trail-110 mm / 4.3 in.
Wheel Travel - Front-120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear-125 mm / 4.9 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)-240 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)-9.4 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)-11.7 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)-296 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc2x 296mm discs 2 piston calipers (ABS)
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle 240mm disc 1 piston caliper (ABS)
Rims-U-section twin 6-spoke cast aluminium
Tyres - Front-120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear-160/60 ZR17
Wheels-U-section twin 6-spoke cast aluminium

Verdict

Winner on specs

2011 Honda CBF 600S

The 2011 Honda CBF 600S edges out the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 thanks to its lower seat height, liquid cooling, fuel injection and dual front discs. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2000 Suzuki SV 650 - Advantages

  • Lighter: 169 kg vs 218 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.

2011 Honda CBF 600S - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 770 mm vs 805 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2000 Suzuki SV 650 vs 2011 Honda CBF 600S - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 and 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 uses V2, while the 2011 Honda CBF 600S is powered by In-line four, four-stroke.
Which is lighter, the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 or the 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 is lighter at 169 kg compared to 218 kg for the 2011 Honda CBF 600S - a difference of 49 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 or the 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
The 2011 Honda CBF 600S has the lower seat at 770 mm, making it more accessible. The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 sits higher at 805 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 or the 2011 Honda CBF 600S?
Both are strong choices. The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 has the edge in lighter kerb weight, while the 2011 Honda CBF 600S stands out for lower seat height and liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Suzuki SV 650 years All Honda CBF 600S years All Honda CBF 600S years
Build your own comparison →