MotoSpecs

1992 Suzuki RGV 250 vs 2020 BMW G 310R

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
1992 Suzuki RGV 250 1992 Suzuki RGV 250

Sport

Engine
Two stroke, 90° V- twin, reed valve
Power
45.5 kW / 61 hp @ 11000 rpm
Top Speed
205.4 km/h / 127.6 mph
Weight
161 kg / 355 lbs
2020 BMW G 310R 2020 BMW G 310R

Sport

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
25 kW / 34 hp @ 9500 rpm
Top Speed
88.9 mph
Weight
158.5 kg / 349 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year19922020
ModelSuzuki RGV 250-
Colours-HP Motorsport, Cosmic Black, Racing Red
Make Model-BMW G 310R
Dimensions
Seat Height755 mm / 29.7 in785 mm / 30.9 in
Wheelbase1375 mm / 54.1 in1374 mm / 54.1 in
Ground Clearance120 mm / 4.7 in-
Height1065 mm / 41.9 in1080 mm / 42.5 in.
Length2015 mm / 79.3 in1988 mm / 78.3 in
Turning Circle3.1 m / 10.2 ft-
Width695 mm / 27.4 in896 mm / 35.3 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight-158.5 kg / 349.4 lbs
Fuel Capacity17 Litres / 4.5 US gal / 3.7 Imp gal11 Litres / 2.9 US gal
Oil Capacity1.1 Litres / 12 US qt / 1.0 Imp qt-
Wet Weight161 kg / 355 lbs158.5 kg / 349 lbs
Performance
Top Speed205.4 km/h / 127.6 mph143.0 km/h / 88.9 mph
Braking (100 km/h - 0)36.0 m / 118 ft-
Braking (60 km/h - 0)12.4 m / 40.7 ft-
Max Power45.5 kW / 61 hp @ 11000 rpm25 kW / 34 hp @ 9500 rpm
Max Power - Rear Tyre43.3 kW / 58 hp @ 11000rpm-
Max Torque40 Nm / 4.1 kgf-m / 29.5 lb-ft @ 8000 rpm28 Nm / 20.7 ft-lb @ 7500 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.2115 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.5 sec / 167.8 km/ / 104.3 mph-
Engine
Engine Type-Single cylinder, four-stroke
CO2-77.3 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission)
Fuel Control-Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)
Displacement249 cc / 15.2 cu in313 cc / 19.1 cu in
Engine DetailTwo stroke, 90° V- twin, reed valveSingle cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves
Fuel System-Injection
Bore x Stroke56 x 50.6 mm80 x 62 mm
Compression Ratio7.3 :110.6:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid Cooled
Emissions-Euro 4
Exhaust valve diameter-27.2 mm
Fuel Consumption8.0 L/100 km / 12.5 km/l / 29.4 US mpg / 35.3 Imp mpg3.33 litres/100 km (30.0 km/l or 70.64 mpg)
Fuel Induction2 x Mikuni TM34SS semi-flat carburetorsBMS-E2
IgnitionPointless Electrical Ignition-
Spark PlugNGK BR9ES-
StarterKickElectric
Valve Diameter (Intake)-33.5 mm
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity12V, 5Ah12V, 8 Ah
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-plateWet multi-plate
Final DriveChain, DID520V2, 114 linksChain, O-ring
Gear Ratios1st 2.454 (27/11) / 2nd 1.625 (26/16) / 3rd 1.235 (21/17) / 4th 1.045 (23/22) / 5th 0.916 (22/24) / 6th 0.840 (21/25)1st 3.000 / 2 nd 2.063 / 3rd 1.588 / 4th 10286 / 5th 1.095 / 6th 0.955:1
Primary Drive Ratios2.565 (59/23)3.083:1
Transmission / Drive6 Speed, constant mesh6-Speed, constant-mesh
Chassis
Frame TypeTwin spar, aluminiumTubular steel frame in grid structure with bolt-on rear frame
Suspension - FrontUSD telescopic fork, 5-way adjustable with anti-dive, oil dampened41mm Telescopic fork
Suspension - RearFull Floater, mono-shock, gas/oil damped, 7-way adjustableAluminium swinging arm in conjunction with a directly mounted spring strut
Lean Angle58°-
Rake25o-
Steering Head Angle-64.9°
Trail94 mm / 3.7 in102.3 mm / 4.02 in
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in140 mm / 5.5 in
Wheel Travel - Rear140 mm / 5.5 in131 mm / 5.5 in
Electrical Systems
Alternator-330W
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front2 x 300 mm Discs ,4 piston calipersSingle 300mm disc
Brakes - RearSingle 210 mm disc, 1 piston caliperSingle 240mm disc
ABS-Standard
Rims - Front-3.0 x 17
Rims - Rear-4.0 x 17
Tyres - Front110/70-17110/70 R17
Tyres - Rear140/60-18150/60 R17
Wheels-5-Spoke, light alloy die-cast

Verdict

Winner on specs

1992 Suzuki RGV 250

The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 edges out the 2020 BMW G 310R thanks to its higher torque, larger fuel tank, lower seat height, dual front discs and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

1992 Suzuki RGV 250 - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 40 Nm vs 28 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
  • Lower seat height: 755 mm vs 785 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More rear wheel travel: 140 mm vs 131 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2020 BMW G 310R - Advantages

  • Standard ABS: A meaningful safety advantage in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.
  • Larger displacement: 313 cc vs 249 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More front wheel travel: 140 mm vs 120 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

1992 Suzuki RGV 250 vs 2020 BMW G 310R - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 and 2020 BMW G 310R?
The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 uses Two stroke, 90° V- twin, reed valve, while the 2020 BMW G 310R is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or the 2020 BMW G 310R?
The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 has the lower seat at 755 mm, making it more accessible. The 2020 BMW G 310R sits higher at 785 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which has the larger fuel tank, the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or the 2020 BMW G 310R?
The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 has the larger tank at approximately 17 litres vs 11 litres for the 2020 BMW G 310R. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 283-340 km vs 183-220 km between stops.
Does the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or 2020 BMW G 310R have ABS?
The 2020 BMW G 310R is listed with ABS as standard. The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 does not list ABS. ABS provides a meaningful safety benefit in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.
Which should I buy, the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or the 2020 BMW G 310R?
Both are strong choices. The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 has the edge in higher torque and larger fuel tank, while the 2020 BMW G 310R stands out for standard ABS and higher front wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Suzuki RGV 250 years All BMW G 310R years
Build your own comparison →