2012 KTM 350 XCF-W vs 2013 Honda CRF 250L

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2012 KTM 350 XCF-W 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Titanium valves
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
643.9 pounds
2013 Honda CRF 250L 2013 Honda CRF 250L

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
317.5 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Comments-Model ID: CRF150RB
ColoursOrange/black/whiteRed/white
Warranty12 Months-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)345 mm255 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)13.6 inches10.0 inches
Seat Height970 mm / 38.2 in.875 mm / 34.4 in.
Wheelbase1,482 mm / 58.3 in.1,445 mm / 56.9 in.
Height1,146 mm / 45.1 in.1,195 mm / 47.0 in.
Length2,065 mm / 81.3 in.2,195 mm / 86.4 in.
Width1,204 mm / 47.4 in.815 mm / 32.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-1.80 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.12 quarts
Dry Weight107 kg / 235.9 lbs-
Fuel Capacity8.50 litres / 2.25 gallons7.70 litres / 2.03 gallons
Wet Weight292.1 kg / 643.9 lbs144.0 kg / 317.5 lbs
Performance
Maximum RPM12000-
Max Torque-22.00 Nm (2.2 kgf-m or 16.2 ft.lbs) @ 7000
Engine
CO2-72.4 CO
Displacement (ci)21.34 cubic inches15.26 cubic inches
Fuel ControlSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)DOHC
Bore x Stroke (mm)88.0 x 57.5 mm76.0 x 55.0 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.5 x 2.3 inches3.0 x 2.2 inches
Displacement (cc)349.70 cc250.00 cc
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Engine DetailTitanium valves-
Fuel SystemInjectionInjection. Programmed fuel injection system (PGM-FI)
Compression Ratio13.2:110.7:1
Emissions-Consult owners manual for optional racing parts.
Engine LubricationPressure circulation lubrication with two Eaton pumps-
Fuel Consumption-3.12 litres/100 km (32.1 km/l or 75.39 mpg)
IgnitionContactless controlled fully electronic ignition with digital ignition adjustmentFull-transistor battery ignition
StarterElectric & kickElectric
Valve System-4
Drivetrain
ClutchMultidisc clutch in oil bath/hydraulically activatedWet multiplate with coil springs
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary DrivePrimary transmission 24:73 Final drive 13:52.Constant mesh
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubingSemi-double cradle. Swing arm: Rear wheel travel.
Suspension - FrontWP Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PATelescopic (Inverted) 43mm diameter slide pipe
Suspension - RearWPSuspension PDS 5018 DCCSwing arm (Pro-link suspension system) 40mm diameter cylinder
Rake26.5°27.0°
Trail-113 mm / 4.4 in.
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in.61 mm / 2.4 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear335 mm / 13.2 in.282 mm / 11.1 in.
Electrical Systems
Lighting system30W x 2 halogen-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.2 inches10.1 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)260 mm256 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches8.7 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm220 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle discSingle disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc. Hydraulic. Single-piston caliper.
RimsExcel AL7 rims with silver anodized stripes,Brakes Front
Tyres - Front80/100-213.00-21
Tyres - Rear100/90-19120/80-P18

Verdict

Winner on specs

2012 KTM 350 XCF-W

The 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W edges out the 2013 Honda CRF 250L thanks to its greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2012 KTM 350 XCF-W - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 345 mm vs 255 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 282 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 61 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 Honda CRF 250L - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 875 mm vs 970 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2012 KTM 350 XCF-W vs 2013 Honda CRF 250L - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W or the 2013 Honda CRF 250L?
The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the lower seat at 875 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W sits higher at 970 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W or the 2013 Honda CRF 250L?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 KTM 350 XCF-W has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2013 Honda CRF 250L stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.