2013 KTM 250 SX-F vs 2014 Honda CRF250R

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 KTM 250 SX-F 2013 KTM 250 SX-F

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
226.6 pounds
2014 Honda CRF250R 2014 Honda CRF250R

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
231.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Comments-Model ID: CRF250R
ColoursOrange/blackRed
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)14.8 inches12.7 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)375 mm323 mm
Seat Height992 mm / 39.1 in.950 mm / 37.4 in.
Wheelbase1,495 mm / 58.9 in.1,488 mm / 58.6 in.
Height1,140 mm / 44.9 in.1,271 mm / 50.0 in.
Length2,090 mm / 82.3 in.2,191 mm / 86.3 in.
Width830 mm / 32.7 in.827 mm / 32.6 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-1.80 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.12 quarts
Dry Weight102.8 kg / 226.6 lbs-
Fuel Capacity7.50 litres / 1.98 gallons6.28 litres / 1.66 gallons
Wet Weight-104.8 kg / 231.0 lbs
Performance
Max Torque9.20 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000 Revolutions47.70 Nm (4.9 kgf-m or 35.2 ft.lbs) @ 6500
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.0815 HP/kg-
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.1 x 2.1 inches3.0 x 2.1 inches
Displacement (ci)15.25 cubic inches15.19 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)249.91 cc249.00 cc
Fuel ControlSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)SOHC
Bore x Stroke (mm)78.0 x 52.3 mm76.8 x 53.8 mm
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Fuel SystemCarburettorInjection. Dual-Timing Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI), 46mm throttle body
Compression Ratio10.6:113.5:1
Emissions-Meets current California Air Resources Board (CARB) and EPA off-road emissions standards.
Engine LubricationForced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps-
IgnitionContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustmentFull transistor with electronic advance
StarterElectricKick
Valve System2-
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operatedMulti plate wet clutch
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Primary Drive13:48. Primary drive: 22:68.#520 Chain; 13T/49T
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing-
Suspension - FrontWP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA CC48mm inverted Showa cartridge fork with 16-position rebound and 16-position compression damping adjustability
Suspension - RearWP ?Suspension 5018 BAVP DCCPro-Link® Showa single shock with spring preload, 17-position rebound damping adjustability, and compression-damping adjustment separated into low-speed (13 positions) and high-speed (3.5 turns); 12.3 inches travel
Rake26.5°27.0°
Trail-118 mm / 4.6 in.
Wheel Travel - Front205 mm / 8.1 in.241 mm / 9.5 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear185 mm / 7.3 in.61 mm / 2.4 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.3 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)220 mm240 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)8.7 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)210 mm240 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Four-piston calipers.Double disc. Two-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.Single disc
Tyres - Front100/80-1780/100-21
Tyres - Rear110/80-17100/90-19

Verdict

Winner on specs

2014 Honda CRF250R

The 2014 Honda CRF250R edges out the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F thanks to its lower seat height, fuel injection, dual front discs and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 KTM 250 SX-F - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 375 mm vs 323 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 185 mm vs 61 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2014 Honda CRF250R - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 950 mm vs 992 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More front wheel travel: 241 mm vs 205 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 KTM 250 SX-F vs 2014 Honda CRF250R - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F or the 2014 Honda CRF250R?
The 2014 Honda CRF250R has the lower seat at 950 mm, making it more accessible. The 2013 KTM 250 SX-F sits higher at 992 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F or the 2014 Honda CRF250R?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 KTM 250 SX-F has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2014 Honda CRF250R stands out for lower seat height and fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.