2011 Kawasaki KX250F vs 2013 KTM 250 SX-F

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2011 Kawasaki KX250F 2011 Kawasaki KX250F

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
232.7 pounds
2013 KTM 250 SX-F 2013 KTM 250 SX-F

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
226.6 pounds
Full Specifications
General
ColoursLime GreenOrange/black
Warranty12 Months-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)330 mm375 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)13.0 inches14.8 inches
Seat Height945 mm / 37.2 in.992 mm / 39.1 in.
Wheelbase1,476 mm / 58.1 in.1,495 mm / 58.9 in.
Height1,270 mm / 50.0 in.1,140 mm / 44.9 in.
Length2,169 mm / 85.4 in.2,090 mm / 82.3 in.
Width820 mm / 32.3 in.830 mm / 32.7 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight-102.8 kg / 226.6 lbs
Fuel Capacity7.19 litres / 1.90 gallons7.50 litres / 1.98 gallons
Wet Weight105.6 kg / 232.7 lbs-
Performance
Max Torque-9.20 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000 Revolutions
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.0815 HP/kg
Engine
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Fuel ControlDOHCSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)
Displacement (cc)249.00 cc249.91 cc
Bore x Stroke (mm)77.0 x 53.6 mm78.0 x 52.3 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.0 x 2.1 inches3.1 x 2.1 inches
Displacement (ci)15.19 cubic inches15.25 cubic inches
Fuel SystemCarburettor. 43mm Keihin throttle bodyCarburettor
Compression Ratio13.5:110.6:1
Engine Lubrication-Forced oil lubrication with 2 Eaton pumps
IgnitionDigital DC-CDIContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System42
Drivetrain
Clutch-Wet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Primary Drive-13:48. Primary drive: 22:68.
Chassis
Frame TypeAluminum perimeterCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing
Suspension - Front47mm inverted Showa SFF telescopic fork with spring preload adjustability and 22 position compression and 20 position rebound damping adjustability/ 12.4 in.WP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA CC
Suspension - RearUni-Trak linkage system and Showa shock with 19 position low-speed and stepless high-speed compression damping, 22 position rebound damping and fully adjustable spring preload / 12.2 in.WP ?Suspension 5018 BAVP DCC
Rake28.2°26.5°
Trail119 mm / 4.7 in.-
Wheel Travel - Front-205 mm / 8.1 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear-185 mm / 7.3 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)9.8 inches8.7 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)250 mm220 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.4 inches8.3 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)240 mm210 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle discSingle disc. Four-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.
Tyres - Front80/100-21100/80-17
Tyres - Rear100/90-19110/80-17

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2011 Kawasaki KX250F and the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2011 Kawasaki KX250F - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 945 mm vs 992 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2013 KTM 250 SX-F - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 375 mm vs 330 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.

2011 Kawasaki KX250F vs 2013 KTM 250 SX-F - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2011 Kawasaki KX250F or the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F?
The 2011 Kawasaki KX250F has the lower seat at 945 mm, making it more accessible. The 2013 KTM 250 SX-F sits higher at 992 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2011 Kawasaki KX250F or the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F?
Both are strong choices. The 2011 Kawasaki KX250F has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2013 KTM 250 SX-F stands out for greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.