2006 Honda CRF 250X vs 2010 Yamaha TW 200
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | Red | White/Red |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 345 mm | 264 mm |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 13.6 inches | 10.4 inches |
| Seat Height | 958 mm / 37.7 in. | 790 mm / 31.1 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. | 1,326 mm / 52.2 in. |
| Height | - | 1,120 mm / 44.1 in. |
| Length | - | 2,090 mm / 82.3 in. |
| Width | - | 820 mm / 32.3 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 102.1 kg / 225.0 lbs | - |
| Fuel Capacity | 8.32 litres / 2.20 gallons | 6.81 litres / 1.80 gallons |
| Wet Weight | - | 126.6 kg / 279.0 lbs |
| Engine |
| CO2 | - | 69.8 CO |
| Fuel Control | - | SOHC |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.1 x 2.1 inches | 2.6 x 2.2 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 78.0 x 52.2 mm | 67.0 x 55.7 mm |
| Displacement (cc) | 249.00 cc | 196.00 cc |
| Displacement (ci) | 15.19 cubic inches | 11.96 cubic inches |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder | Single cylinder, four-stroke |
| Stroke | 4 | - |
| Fuel System | Carburettor. Keihin 37.0 mm flat-slide with throttle position sensor (TPS) | Carburettor. Mikuni® 28mm |
| Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 3.01 litres/100 km (33.2 km/l or 78.15 mpg) |
| Ignition | CD with electronic advance and lighting coil | CDI |
| Starter | Electric & kick | Electric |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Multiple-disc wet clutch |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Chassis |
| Suspension - Front | 47.0mm inverted Showa cartridge fork with 16-position rebound and 16-position compression damping adjustability | Telescopic fork |
| Suspension - Rear | Pro-Link Showa single shock with spring-preload, 17-position rebound-damping adjustability, and compression-damping adjustment separated into low-speed (13 positions) and high-speed (3.5 turns) | Single shock |
| Rake | 27.9° | - |
| Trail | 118 mm / 4.6 in. | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 315 mm / 12.4 in. | 160 mm / 6.3 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 315 mm / 12.4 in. | 150 mm / 5.9 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 9.4 inches | 8.7 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 240 mm | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | 9.4 inches | 4.3 inches |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | 240 mm | 110 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc | Single disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tyres - Front | 80/70-21 | 130/80-18 |
| Tyres - Rear | 100/90-18 | 180/80-14 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2006 Honda CRF 250X
The 2006 Honda CRF 250X edges out the 2010 Yamaha TW 200 thanks to its greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2006 Honda CRF 250X - Advantages
- 🏔️More ground clearance: 345 mm vs 264 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
- 🔄More rear wheel travel: 315 mm vs 150 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
- 🔄More front wheel travel: 315 mm vs 160 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.
2010 Yamaha TW 200 - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 790 mm vs 958 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2006 Honda CRF 250X vs 2010 Yamaha TW 200 - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2006 Honda CRF 250X and 2010 Yamaha TW 200?
The 2006 Honda CRF 250X uses Single cylinder, while the 2010 Yamaha TW 200 is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2006 Honda CRF 250X or the 2010 Yamaha TW 200?
The 2010 Yamaha TW 200 has the lower seat at 790 mm, making it more accessible. The 2006 Honda CRF 250X sits higher at 958 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2006 Honda CRF 250X or the 2010 Yamaha TW 200?
Both are strong choices. The 2006 Honda CRF 250X has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2010 Yamaha TW 200 stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.