2013 Honda CRF 250L vs 2014 Husaberg TE 300

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 Honda CRF 250L 2013 Honda CRF 250L

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
317.5 pounds
2014 Husaberg TE 300 2014 Husaberg TE 300

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Two stroke, single-cylinder
Power
NA
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
103 kg / 226 lbs
Full Specifications
General
CommentsModel ID: CRF150RB-
Year-2013 - 14
ColoursRed/white-
Make Model-Husaberg TE 300
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)255 mm-
Ground Clearance (in.)10.0 inches-
Seat Height875 mm / 34.4 in.985 mm / 38.7 in
Wheelbase1,445 mm / 56.9 in.1475 +± 10 mm / 58.0 in
Ground Clearance-385 mm / 15.1 in
Height1,195 mm / 47.0 in.-
Length2,195 mm / 86.4 in.-
Width815 mm / 32.1 in.-
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)1.80 litres-
Oil Capacity (Quarts)0.12 quarts-
Fuel Capacity7.70 litres / 2.03 gallons11 Litres / 2.9 US gal
Wet Weight144.0 kg / 317.5 lbs103 kg / 226 lbs
Performance
Max Power-NA
Max Torque22.00 Nm (2.2 kgf-m or 16.2 ft.lbs) @ 7000NA
Engine
Bore x Stroke (mm)76.0 x 55.0 mm-
CO272.4 CO-
Displacement (cc)250.00 cc-
Displacement (ci)15.26 cubic inches-
Fuel ControlDOHC-
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-stroke-
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.0 x 2.2 inches-
Displacement-293.2
Engine Detail-Two stroke, single-cylinder
Fuel SystemInjection. Programmed fuel injection system (PGM-FI)-
Bore x Stroke-72 x 72 mm
Compression Ratio10.7:1-
Cooling System-Liquid cooled
EmissionsConsult owners manual for optional racing parts.-
Engine Oil Specification-Motorex, SAE 15W-50
Fuel Consumption3.12 litres/100 km (32.1 km/l or 75.39 mpg)-
Fuel Induction-Keihin PWK 36S AG
IgnitionFull-transistor battery ignitionKokusan
StarterElectricElectric & Kick
Valve System4-
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity-12V 3Ah/12V 3Ah
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multiplate with coil springsWet multi-disc clutch, hydraulically operated
Final DriveChainChain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Gearbox6-speed-
Primary DriveConstant mesh-
Transmission / Drive-6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeSemi-double cradle. Swing arm: Rear wheel travel.Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4, Aluminium Subframe
Suspension - FrontTelescopic (Inverted) 43mm diameter slide pipeSingle 260mm 2 piston caliper
Suspension - RearSwing arm (Pro-link suspension system) 40mm diameter cylinder90/90-21
Rake27.0°-
Steering Head Angle-63.5°
Trail113 mm / 4.4 in.-
Wheel Travel - Front61 mm / 2.4 in.Single 220mm disc 1 piston caliper
Wheel Travel - Rear282 mm / 11.1 in.140/80-18
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)256 mm-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm-
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.1 inches-
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers.-
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Hydraulic. Single-piston caliper.-
RimsBrakes Front-
Tyres - Front3.00-21-
Tyres - Rear120/80-P18-

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2013 Honda CRF 250L and the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2013 Honda CRF 250L - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 875 mm vs 985 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • More rear wheel travel: 282 mm vs 140/80-18 - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2014 Husaberg TE 300 - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • More ground clearance: 385 mm vs 255 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More front wheel travel: Single 220mm disc 1 piston caliper vs 61 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 Honda CRF 250L vs 2014 Husaberg TE 300 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Honda CRF 250L and 2014 Husaberg TE 300?
The 2013 Honda CRF 250L uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 is powered by Two stroke, single-cylinder.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Honda CRF 250L or the 2014 Husaberg TE 300?
The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the lower seat at 875 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 Husaberg TE 300 sits higher at 985 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Honda CRF 250L or the 2014 Husaberg TE 300?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the edge in lower seat height and fuel injection, while the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 stands out for liquid cooling and greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.