MotoSpecs

2011 Honda CBR 600RR vs 2012 Triumph Daytona 675

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2011 Honda CBR 600RR 2011 Honda CBR 600RR

Sport

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
118 hp / 88.1 kW @ 13500 rpm
Top Speed
255.3 km/h / 158.6 mph
Weight
410.0 pounds
2012 Triumph Daytona 675 2012 Triumph Daytona 675

Sport

Engine
Four stroke, in-line 3-cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Power
94 kW / 126 hp @ 12600rpm
Top Speed
251 km/h / 156 mph
Weight
161 kg / 356 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year20112012
ColoursRed/Black. Black.-
Make ModelHonda CBR 600RRTriumph Daytona 675
WarrantyOne Year. Transferable, unlimited-mileage limited warranty.-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)5.0 inches-
Ground Clearance (mm)127 mm-
Seat Height820 mm / 32.3 in820 mm / 32.3 in
Wheelbase1369 mm / 53.9 in1395 mm / 54.9 in
Ground Clearance135 mm / 5.3 in-
Height1105 mm / 43.5 inwithout mirrors 1105 mm m / 43.5 in
Length2015 mm / 79.3 in2020 mm / 79.5 in
Width685 mm / 26.9 in(handlebars) 710 mm / 27.9 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight156.5 kg / 345 lbs161 kg / 356 lbs
Fuel Capacity18.2 liters / 4.8 gal17.5 Litres / 4.6 US gal / 3.8 Imp gal
Oil Capacity-3.6 Litres / 1.0 US gal / 0.8 Imp gal
Wet Weight186 kg / 410 lbs-
Performance
Mods from previous modelAlso called USHighland 507 ATX QuadRacer.-
Top Speed255.3 km/h / 158.6 mph251 km/h / 156 mph
Max Power118 hp / 88.1 kW @ 13500 rpm94 kW / 126 hp @ 12600rpm
Max Torque66 Nm / 48.6 lb-ft @ 11250 rpm73 Nm / 7.4 kgf-m / 54 ft/lb @ 11750rpm
Standing Start ¼ Mile11.1 sec11.38 sec
Engine
Fuel ControlDOHC-
Engine TypeIn-line four, four-stroke-
CO2133.2 CO-
Displacement599 cc / 36.5 cu-in675 cc / 41.2 cu in
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.Four stroke, in-line 3-cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Fuel SystemInjection. Dual Stage Fuel Injection (DSFI) with 40mm throttle bodies, Denso 12-hole injectors-
Bore x Stroke67 x 42.5 mm76 x 49.6 mm
Compression Ratio12.2:112.65:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid-cooled
EmissionsMeets current EPA standards. California version meets current CARB standards and may differ slightly due to emissions equipment.-
Engine Oil SpecificationSynthetic, 10W/40-
Exhaust-Stainless steel 3 into 1 system with valve in secondary and under seat silencer
Fuel Consumption5.74 litres/100 km (17.4 km/l or 40.98 mpg)6.0 L/100 km / 16.6 km/l / 39 US mpg / 47 Imp mpg
Fuel InductionDual Stage Fuel Injection (DSFI) with 40mm throttle bodies, Denso 12-hole injectorsMultipoint sequential electronic fuel injection with forced air induction
IgnitionComputer-controlled digital transistorized with electronic advance and independent four-cylinder 3D-mapped computer control. Digital - inductive type
LubricationWet sumpWet sump
Spark PlugNGK, IMR9C-9H-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System4-
Drivetrain
ClutchCable-operated multiplate wet clutch.Wet, multi-plate
Final Drive #525 O-ring chainO ring chain
Gearbox6-speed-
Primary Drive#525 O-ring chain-
Transmission / DriveClose-ratio 6 Speed 6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeAluminium, twin sparAluminum beam twin spar, swingarm braced twin sided, aluminum alloy with adjustable pivot position
Suspension - Front41mm inverted Big Piston Fork with spring preload, rebound and compression damping adjustability41mm USD forks with adjustable preload, rebound and compression damping
Suspension - RearUnit Pro-Link HMAS single shock with spring preload, rebound and compression damping adjustability;Monoshock with piggy back reservoir adjustable for preload, rebound and compression damping
Rake23.5°23.9°
Trail97.7mm / 3.9 in89.1 mm / 3.5 in
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.3 in-
Wheel Travel - Rear129.5 mm / 5.1 in-
Electrical Systems
Instrumentation-Display/Functions LCD multi-functional instrument pack with digital speedometer, trip computer, analogue tachometer, lap timer, gear position indicator and programmable gear change lights and clock
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)310 mm-
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.2 inches-
Brakes - Front2x 310mm discs 4 piston calipers2 x 308 mm Discs, 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 220mm disc 1 piston caliperSingle 220 mm disc, 1 piston caliper
Tyres - Front120/70 ZR17120/70 ZR 17
Tyres - Rear180/55 ZR17180/55 ZR 17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2012 Triumph Daytona 675

The 2012 Triumph Daytona 675 edges out the 2011 Honda CBR 600RR thanks to its higher torque, lighter kerb weight, dual front discs and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2011 Honda CBR 600RR - Advantages

  • More power: Produces 118 hp vs 94 kW - a meaningful performance advantage.

2012 Triumph Daytona 675 - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 73 Nm vs 66 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Lighter: 161 kg vs 186 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • Larger displacement: 675 cc vs 599 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.

2011 Honda CBR 600RR vs 2012 Triumph Daytona 675 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2011 Honda CBR 600RR and 2012 Triumph Daytona 675?
The 2011 Honda CBR 600RR uses In-line four, four-stroke, while the 2012 Triumph Daytona 675 is powered by Four stroke, in-line 3-cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder..
Which is lighter, the 2011 Honda CBR 600RR or the 2012 Triumph Daytona 675?
The 2012 Triumph Daytona 675 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 186 kg for the 2011 Honda CBR 600RR - a difference of 25 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which has more power, the 2011 Honda CBR 600RR or the 2012 Triumph Daytona 675?
The 2011 Honda CBR 600RR produces more peak power at 118 hp, compared to 94 kW for the 2012 Triumph Daytona 675.
Which should I buy, the 2011 Honda CBR 600RR or the 2012 Triumph Daytona 675?
Both are strong choices. The 2011 Honda CBR 600RR has the edge in more peak power, while the 2012 Triumph Daytona 675 stands out for higher torque and lighter kerb weight. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Honda CBR 600RR years All Triumph Daytona 675 years
Build your own comparison →