2008 Buell XB12S Lightning vs 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2008 Buell XB12S Lightning 2008 Buell XB12S Lightning

Naked bike

Engine
45° V-Twin, four stroke, pushrod actuated overhead valve. hydraulic self-adjusting lifters, 2 valve per cylinder.
Power
86.9 kW / 103 hp @ 6800 rpm
Top Speed
216.2 km/h / 134 mph
Weight
179 kg / 395 lbs
2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
132.1 kW / 181.5 hp @ 9500 rpm
Top Speed
252.9 km/h / 157.1 mph
Weight
235.0 kg / 518.1 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year20082009
Make ModelBuell XB12S LightningSuzuki GSX 1300 B-King
Dimensions
Seat Height765 mm / 30.1"805 mm / 31.7 in
Wheelbase1320 mm / 52.0"1525 mm / 60.0 in
Ground Clearance110 mm / 4.4"120 mm / 4.7 in
Height1092 mm / 43.0"-
Length1924 mm / 75.7"2245 mm / 88.4 in
Width768 mm / 30.2"800 mm / 31.5 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight179 kg / 395 lbs235.0 kg / 518.1 lbs
Fuel Capacity14 L / 3.7 US gal16.5 Litres / 4.4 US gal / 3.6 Imp gal
Maximum Load / GVWR386 kg / 850 lbs-
Oil Capacity2.37 L / 2.50 qts-
Performance
Top Speed216.2 km/h / 134 mph252.9 km/h / 157.1 mph
Max Power86.9 kW / 103 hp @ 6800 rpm132.1 kW / 181.5 hp @ 9500 rpm
Max Torque114 Nm / 11.6 kgf-m / 84 ft-lbs @ 6000 rpm146 Nm / 14.9 kgf-m / 108 lb-ft @ 7200 rpm
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.2 sec10.4 sec
Engine
Displacement1203 cc / 73 cu in1340 cc / 81.8 cu-in
Engine Detail45° V-Twin, four stroke, pushrod actuated overhead valve. hydraulic self-adjusting lifters, 2 valve per cylinder.Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Bore x Stroke88.9 x 96.8 mm81 x 65 mm
Compression Ratio10.0:112.5:1
Cooling SystemAir cooledLiquid cooled
ExhaustFree breathing, 2-into-1 Tuned, tri-pass resonance chamber with InterActive valve and mass-centralized mounting4-into-2-into-1 exhaust system with a large capacity catalyzer, oxygen sensors and an oval cross section canister with dual openings that meets Euro 3 and Tier 2 regulation
Fuel Consumption-6.2 L/100 km / 16.1 km/l / 38 US mpg / 45 Imp mpg
Fuel InductionØ49 mm downdraft DDFI II fuel injectionFuel injection . Suzuki SDTV fuel injection system with dual injectors per cylinder and ram air intake with large volume airbox
Fuel Reserve2.8 L / 0.75 US gal-
Ignition-Electronic
LubricationDry sumpWet sump
StarterElectricElectric
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-plateWet, multiple discs, hydraulic operated
Final DriveBeltChain, RK GB50GSV Z4, 118 links
Gear Ratios1st 2.649 / 2nd 1.892 / 3rd 1.407 / 4th 1.166 / 5th 1.000-
Transmission / Drive5 Speed6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeAluminium frame with Uniplanar Powertrain vibration isolation system, fuel in frameTwin-spar cast aluminum alloy
Suspension - FrontShowa ø43 mm inverted forks compression damping, rebound damping and spring preload adjustableInverted telescopic coil springs, spring preload, rebound and compression damping fully adjustable.
Suspension - RearShowa coil-over monoshock, remote underseat reservoir and adjustable compression damping, rebound damping and spring preload, 127mm wheel travelLink type, oil damped, coil springs, spring preload, rebound and compression damping fully adjustable.
Rake21°25.7°
Trail83 mm / 3.3"107 mm / 4.2 in
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7"120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear127 mm / 5.0"137 mm / 5.4 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - FrontZTL type brake, 6 piston, fixed caliper, Ø375 mm single-sided, inside out, stainless steel, floating rotor2 x 310 mm Discs, 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle Ø240 mm disc, 1 piston floating caliperSingle 260m disc, 1 piston caliper
Tyres - Front120/70 ZR17 Pirelli120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear180/55 ZR17 Pirelli200/50 ZR17
Wheels6-Spoke, ZTL cast aluminium-
Wheels - Front3.50 x 17"3.50 x 17
Wheels - Rear5.50 x 17"6.00 x 17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King

The 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King edges out the 2008 Buell XB12S Lightning thanks to its higher torque, liquid cooling, dual front discs, greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2008 Buell XB12S Lightning - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 765 mm vs 805 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 146 Nm vs 114 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • Larger displacement: 1340 cc vs 1203 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More ground clearance: 120 mm vs 110 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 137 mm vs 127 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2008 Buell XB12S Lightning vs 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2008 Buell XB12S Lightning and 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King?
The 2008 Buell XB12S Lightning uses 45° V-Twin, four stroke, pushrod actuated overhead valve. hydraulic self-adjusting lifters, 2 valve per cylinder., while the 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King is powered by Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2008 Buell XB12S Lightning or the 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King?
The 2008 Buell XB12S Lightning has the lower seat at 765 mm, making it more accessible. The 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King sits higher at 805 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2008 Buell XB12S Lightning or the 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King?
Both are strong choices. The 2008 Buell XB12S Lightning has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2009 Suzuki GSX 1300 B-King stands out for higher torque and liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.