MotoSpecs

2013 BMW R 1200R vs 2013 Triumph Bonneville

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 BMW R 1200R 2013 BMW R 1200R

Naked bike

Engine
Two cylinder boxer, two-stroke
Power
81 kW / 110 hp @ 7750 rpm
Top Speed
220 km/h / 137 mph
Weight
491.6 pounds
2013 Triumph Bonneville 2013 Triumph Bonneville

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
49 kW / 66 hp @ 7250 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
225 kg / 495 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year20132013
ColoursBlue, Beige, Black/white, Silver-
Make ModelBMW R 1200RTriumph Bonneville
Dimensions
Seat Height800mm / 31.5 in (Standard, OE, OA, sport seat) 830mm / 32.7 in (OE, OA, comfort seat, high) / 760mm / 29.9 in (OE, OA, seat, low) / 750mm / 29.5 in (OE, low slung)739 mm / 29.1 in
Wheelbase1495 mm / 59.1 in1488 mm / 58.6 in
Height1273 mm / 50.1 in (excl. mirrors)1130 mm / 44.5 in
Length2145 mm / 84.4 in2113 mm / 83.2 in
Width906 mm / 35.6 in (incl. mirrors)840 mm / 33.1 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight198 kg / 436.5 lbs205 kg / 451 lbs
Fuel Capacity18 Litres / 4.7 US gal16.0 Litres / 4.2 US gal / 3.5 Imp gal
Wet Weight223 kg / 492 lbs225 kg / 495 lbs
Performance
Maximum RPM9000-
Top Speed220 km/h / 137 mph-
Acceleration (0-100 km/h)3.4 sec-
Acceleration (60-100 / 100-140 / 140-180 km/h)3.9 sec / 4.0 sec / 5.0 sec-
Acceleration (60-140 km/h)7.9 sec-
Max Power81 kW / 110 hp @ 7750 rpm49 kW / 66 hp @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque120 Nm / 12.2 kgf-m / 88 lb-ft @ 6000 rpm71 Nm / 7.24 kgf-m / 52 ft-lb @ 6000 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.4394 HP/kg-
Standing Start 0-140 km/h6.4 sec-
Standing Start 0-200 km/h15.0 sec-
Engine
CO295.1 CO-
Engine TypeTwo cylinder boxer, two-stroke-
Fuel ControlDOHC-
Displacement1170 cc / 71.4 cu in865 cc / 52.8 cu in
Engine DetailFour stroke, two cylinder horizontally opposed Boxer, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel SystemInjection. Electronic intake pipe injection / BMS-K+ digital engine management with overrun fuel cut-off, twin-spark ignition-
Bore x Stroke101 x 73 mm90 x 68 mm
Compression Ratio11.0:19.2:1
Cooling SystemAir/Oil-cooledAir-cooled
EmissionsClosed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard EU-3-
Engine LubricationDry sump-
Engine Oil Specification-Synthetic, 15W/50
Fuel Consumption5.2 L/100 km / 19.2 km/l / 45.2 US mpg-
Fuel InductionElectronic intake manifold injection BMS-KMultipoint Sequential Fuel injection
Fuel Reserve3.00 litres / 0.79 gallons-
IgnitionDigital engine managementDigital
Lubrication-Wet sump
StarterElectric-
Valve System2-
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity12 V / 14 Ah, maintenance-free-
Drivetrain
ClutchSingle disc dry clutch, hydraulically actuatedWet, multi plate
Final DriveShaftChain, X-ring
Gear Ratios1st 2.375 / 2nd 1.696 / 3rd 1.296 / 4th 0.065 / 5th 0.939 / 6th 0.848-
Gearbox6-speed-
Primary DriveConstant mesh-
Transmission / Drive6 Speed 5 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel spaceframe, load-bearing engineTubular steel cradle, swing arm: twin-sided, tubular steel
Suspension - FrontBMW Motorrad Telelever; stanchion diameter 41 mm, central spring strut41mm Kayaba telescopic forks
Suspension - RearCast aluminium single-sided swing arm with BMW Motorrad Paralever; central spring strut, spring pre-load hydraulically adjustable (continuously variable) at handwheel, rebound damping adjustableKayaba chrome spring twin shocks with adjustable preload
Rake27.1°26°
Steering Head Angle62.9°-
Trail119.1 mm / 4.7 in106 mm / 4.2 in
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear140 mm / 5.5 in106 mm / 4.17 in
Electrical Systems
AlternatorThree-phase alternator 720 W-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.4 inches-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)265 mm-
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches-
Brakes - Front2 x 320mm Discs, ABSSingle 310 mm disc, 2 piston Nissen floating calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 265mm disc, ABS-
RimsCast aluminium wheels-
Rims - Front3.50 x 17'-
Rims - Rear5.50 x 17'-
Tyres - Front120/70-ZR 17100/70 R17
Tyres - Rear180/55-ZR 17130/80 R17
WheelsCast aluminium wheels-
Wheels - Front-Cast aluminium alloy, 7 spokes, 17 x 3.0 in
Wheels - Rear-Cast aluminium alloy, 7spokes, 17 x 3.5 in

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 BMW R 1200R

The 2013 BMW R 1200R edges out the 2013 Triumph Bonneville thanks to its more peak power, higher torque, dual front discs, higher rear wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 BMW R 1200R - Advantages

  • More power: Produces 81 kW vs 49 kW - a meaningful performance advantage.
  • Higher torque: 120 Nm vs 71 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • Larger displacement: 1170 cc vs 865 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More rear wheel travel: 140 mm vs 106 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2013 Triumph Bonneville - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 739 mm vs 800mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2013 BMW R 1200R vs 2013 Triumph Bonneville - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 BMW R 1200R and 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
The 2013 BMW R 1200R uses Two cylinder boxer, two-stroke, while the 2013 Triumph Bonneville is powered by Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder. This is a fundamental difference - the 2013 BMW R 1200R is a two-stroke engine while the 2013 Triumph Bonneville runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which has more power, the 2013 BMW R 1200R or the 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
The 2013 BMW R 1200R produces more peak power at 81 kW, compared to 49 kW for the 2013 Triumph Bonneville.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 BMW R 1200R or the 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
The 2013 Triumph Bonneville has the lower seat at 739 mm, making it more accessible. The 2013 BMW R 1200R sits higher at 800mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 BMW R 1200R or the 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 BMW R 1200R has the edge in more peak power and higher torque, while the 2013 Triumph Bonneville stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All BMW R 1200R years All Triumph Bonneville years
Build your own comparison →