1995 BMW R 1100R vs 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000 vs 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000

Full specifications comparison • 3 motorcycles

Comparing 3 motorcycles
1995 BMW R 1100R 1995 BMW R 1100R

Naked bike

Engine
Two cylinder boxer, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
478.4 pounds
2006 Kawasaki Z 1000 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
127 hp / 92.7 kW @ 10000 rpm
Top Speed
238 km/h / 148 mph
Weight
221 kg / 487.2 lbs
2006 Kawasaki Z 1000 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
437.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year-2005 - 06
Colours-Metallic Raw Titanium
Make Model-Kawasaki Z 1000
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)-5.7 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)-145 mm
Seat Height780 mm / 30.7 in.820 mm / 32.3 in.
Wheelbase-1420 mm / 55.9 in
Ground Clearance-145 mm / 5.7 in
Height-1055 mm / 41.5 in
Length-2080 mm / 81.9 in
Width-770 mm / 30.3 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight217 kg / 478.4 lbs198.2 kg / 437.0 lbs
Fuel Capacity-18.16 litres / 4.80 gallons
Wet Weight-221 kg / 487.2 lbs
Performance
Top Speed-238 km/h / 148 mph
Max Power-127 hp / 92.7 kW @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque95.10 Nm (9.7 kgf-m or 70.1 ft.lbs) @ 525095.59
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.3687 HP/kg-
Standing Start ¼ Mile-11.3 sec / 122 mph
Engine
Bore x Stroke (mm)-77.2 x 50.9 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)-3.0 x 2.0 inches
Stroke-4
Fuel Control-DOHC
Engine TypeTwo cylinder boxer, four-strokeIn-line four, four-stroke
Displacement (ci)66.21 cubic inches58.15 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)1085.00 cc953.00 cc
Displacement-953 cc / 58.1 cu-in
Engine Detail-Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Fuel System-Carburettor. Keihin CVK36 x 4
Bore x Stroke-77.2 x 50.9 mm
Compression Ratio-11.2:1
Cooling System-Liquid cooled
Engine Oil Specification-Synthetic, 10W/40
Fuel Consumption-18.9 km/lit
Fuel Induction-4x 38mm throttle bodies
Ignition-Digital
Lubrication-Wet sump
Spark Plug-NGK, CR9EK
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44
Drivetrain
Clutch-Wet, multiple discs, cable operated
Final DriveShaft drive (cardan)Chain
Gearbox5-speed6-speed
Transmission / Drive-6 Speed
Chassis
Frame Type-Steel, Backbone frame
Suspension - Front-41mm cartridge fork, rebound, spring preload adjustable
Suspension - Rear-Uni-Trak, rebound spring preload adjustable
Rake-25°
Trail-102 mm / 4.0 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)-300 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)-220 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)-11.8 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)-8.7 inches
Brakes - FrontDual disc2x 300mm 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle 292mm disc 2 piston caliper
Tyres - Front-120/70 R17
Tyres - Rear-190/50 R17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2006 Kawasaki Z 1000

The 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000 edges out the 1995 BMW R 1100R thanks to its liquid cooling and dual front discs. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

1995 BMW R 1100R - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 780 mm vs 820 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2006 Kawasaki Z 1000 - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

1995 BMW R 1100R vs 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 1995 BMW R 1100R and 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000?
The 1995 BMW R 1100R uses Two cylinder boxer, four-stroke, while the 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000 is powered by In-line four.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 1995 BMW R 1100R or the 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000?
The 1995 BMW R 1100R has the lower seat at 780 mm, making it more accessible. The 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000 sits higher at 820 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 1995 BMW R 1100R or the 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000?
Both are strong choices. The 1995 BMW R 1100R has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2006 Kawasaki Z 1000 stands out for liquid cooling and dual front discs. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.