2012 Zero S vs 2013 Suzuki GSR750

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2012 Zero S 2012 Zero S

Naked bike

Engine
N/A
Power
N/A
Top Speed
108 km/h / 67 mph
Weight
135 kg / 297 lbs
2013 Suzuki GSR750 2013 Suzuki GSR750

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
N/A
Full Specifications
General
Comments-Sold in the Philippines.
Year2012-
Colours-Red, Black, White
Make ModelZero S-
Dimensions
Seat Height832 mm / 32.8 in (Low seat height 781 mm/ 30.8 in)815 mm / 32.1 in.
Wheelbase1410 mm / 55.5 in1,450 mm / 57.1 in.
Height-1,060 mm / 41.7 in.
Length-2,115 mm / 83.3 in.
Width-785 mm / 30.9 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.06 quarts
Oil Capacity (l)-0.90 litres
Fuel Capacity-17.50 litres / 4.62 gallons
Load Capacity136 kg / 300 lbs-
Wet Weight135 kg / 297 lbs-
Performance
Top Speed108 km/h / 67 mph-
Engine
Bore x Stroke (mm)-72.0 x 46.0 mm
Displacement (ci)-45.70 cubic inches
Engine Type-In-line four, four-stroke
Fuel Control-DOHC
Bore x Stroke (in,)-2.8 x 1.8 inches
Displacement (cc)-749.00 cc
Fuel System-Injection
Compression Ratio-12.3:1
Engine Lubrication-Wet sump
Ignition-Electronic (Transistorised)
Starter-Electric
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity3.9 kWh-
Battery Capacity (kWh)4.4 kWh-
Charging Time4 hours-
EPA UDDS Range43 miles (70 km)-
Estimated pack life (to 80%)(to 80%) 70,000 miles (112,000 km)-
Maximum Range58 miles (93 km)-
MotorHigh Efficiency, Forced Air Cooled, DC, Axial Flux, Permanent Magnet-
Quick Charge Time2.3 hours (100% charged) / 2 hours (90+% charged)-
Drivetrain
Final DriveTransmission Clutchless one speed Drive system 98T / 28T, Poly Chain GT Carbon belt Drive system (accessory) 51T / 13T, 420 ChainChain
Gearbox-6-speed
Primary Drive-Constant mesh
Chassis
Suspension - FrontTelescopic forksInverted telescopic, Coil spring, Oil damped
Suspension - RearMono shockLink type, Coil spring, Oil damped
Rake22.7°-
Trail71 mm / 2.8 in-
Wheel Travel - Front140 mm / 5.5 in-
Wheel Travel - Rear151 mm / 5.9 in-
Electrical Systems
Input Voltage110V or 220V-
Instrumentation-Instruments with adjustable brightness, analogue tachometer and a large digital LCD speedometer. The LCD display also includes a gear position indicator, fuel gauge , odometer/trip meter and a clock.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - FrontSingle 310mm disc, 2 piston caliperDouble disc
Brakes - RearSingle 220mm disc, 1 piston caliperSingle disc
Tyres - Front110/70-17120/70-ZR17
Tyres - Rear130/70 -17180/55-ZR17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Suzuki GSR750

The 2013 Suzuki GSR750 edges out the 2012 Zero S thanks to its lower seat height, fuel injection and dual front discs. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2012 Zero S - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2012 Zero S matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 Suzuki GSR750 - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 815 mm vs 832 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2012 Zero S vs 2013 Suzuki GSR750 - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 Zero S or the 2013 Suzuki GSR750?
The 2013 Suzuki GSR750 has the lower seat at 815 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 Zero S sits higher at 832 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 Zero S or the 2013 Suzuki GSR750?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 Zero S has its own strengths, while the 2013 Suzuki GSR750 stands out for lower seat height and fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.