MotoSpecs

2013 Yamaha YZ250F vs 2016 Husqvarna TC250

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 Yamaha YZ250F 2013 Yamaha YZ250F

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
227.0 pounds
2016 Husqvarna TC250 2016 Husqvarna TC250

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
97.7 kg / 215.4 lbs
Full Specifications
General
ColoursTeam Yamaha Blue/White, White/Red-
Warranty30 Day (Limited Factory Warranty)2 Years
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)378 mm385 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)14.9 inches15.2 inches
Seat Height991 mm / 39.0 in.992 mm / 39.1 in.
Wheelbase1,476 mm / 58.1 in.1,495 mm / 58.9 in.
Height1,306 mm / 51.4 in.-
Length2,169 mm / 85.4 in.-
Width826 mm / 32.5 in.-
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-0.90 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.06 quarts
Dry Weight210.5 kg / 464.1 lbs97.7 kg / 215.4 lbs
Fuel Capacity6.06 litres / 1.60 gallons7.50 litres / 1.98 gallons
Wet Weight103.0 kg / 227.0 lbs-
Performance
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.1143 HP/kg-
Engine
Fuel ControlDOHCDouble Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Displacement (ci)15.26 cubic inches15.22 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)250.00 cc249.50 cc
Bore x Stroke (mm)77.0 x 53.6 mm66.4 x 72.0 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.0 x 2.1 inches2.6 x 2.8 inches
Engine Detail-Reed valves
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Keihin FCR MX39-
Compression Ratio13.5:1-
IgnitionCDIKokusan
StarterElectricKick
Drivetrain
Clutch-Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Chassis
Frame Type-25CrMo4 steel central-tube frame
Suspension - FrontKYB Speed-Sensitive System, inverted fork: fully adjustable, 11.8-in travelWP USD ? 48 mm 4CS closed cartridge
Suspension - RearKYB Fully adjustable single shockWP shock absorber with linkage
Rake28.0°26.5°
Seat2-person seat-
Wheel Travel - Front-300 mm / 11.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear318 mm / 12.5 in.317 mm / 12.5 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.6 inches7.9 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)250 mm260 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)9.8 inches10.2 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)245 mm200 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Hydraulic disc. Hydraulic disc.Single disc
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc
Tyres - Front21/7-1080/100-21
Tyres - Rear100/90-19120/90-19

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2013 Yamaha YZ250F and the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2013 Yamaha YZ250F - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2013 Yamaha YZ250F matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2016 Husqvarna TC250 - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2016 Husqvarna TC250 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 Yamaha YZ250F vs 2016 Husqvarna TC250 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Yamaha YZ250F and 2016 Husqvarna TC250?
The 2013 Yamaha YZ250F uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2013 Yamaha YZ250F is a four-stroke engine while the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which should I buy, the 2013 Yamaha YZ250F or the 2016 Husqvarna TC250?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Yamaha YZ250F has its own strengths, while the 2016 Husqvarna TC250 offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Yamaha YZ250F years All Husqvarna TC250 years
Build your own comparison →