2012 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2014 Husaberg TE 300
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | - | 2013 - 14 |
| Colours | Blue/White | - |
| Make Model | - | Husaberg TE 300 |
| Warranty | 30 Day (Limited Factory Warranty) | - |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 366 mm | - |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 14.4 inches | - |
| Seat Height | 980 mm / 38.6 in. | 985 mm / 38.7 in |
| Wheelbase | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. | 1475 +± 10 mm / 58.0 in |
| Ground Clearance | - | 385 mm / 15.1 in |
| Height | 1,298 mm / 51.1 in. | - |
| Length | 2,164 mm / 85.2 in. | - |
| Width | 826 mm / 32.5 in. | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Fuel Capacity | 7.95 litres / 2.10 gallons | 11 Litres / 2.9 US gal |
| Wet Weight | 116.1 kg / 256.0 lbs | 103 kg / 226 lbs |
| Performance |
| Max Power | - | NA |
| Max Torque | - | NA |
| Engine |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, four-stroke | - |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.0 x 2.1 inches | - |
| Displacement (cc) | 250.00 cc | - |
| Displacement (ci) | 15.26 cubic inches | - |
| Fuel Control | DOHC | - |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 77.0 x 53.6 mm | - |
| Displacement | - | 293.2 |
| Engine Detail | Titanium valves | Two stroke, single-cylinder |
| Fuel System | Carburettor. Keihin FCR 37 | - |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 72 x 72 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | - |
| Cooling System | - | Liquid cooled |
| Engine Lubrication | Wet, multidisc | - |
| Engine Oil Specification | - | Motorex, SAE 15W-50 |
| Fuel Induction | - | Keihin PWK 36S AG |
| Ignition | CDI | Kokusan |
| Starter | Electric | Electric & Kick |
| Valve System | 5 | - |
| EV Specifics |
| Battery Capacity | - | 12V 3Ah/12V 3Ah |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet multiplate | Wet multi-disc clutch, hydraulically operated |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4" |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | - |
| Primary Drive | Constant-mesh 5-speed | - |
| Transmission / Drive | - | 6 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4, Aluminium Subframe |
| Suspension - Front | Inverted fork | Single 260mm 2 piston caliper |
| Suspension - Rear | Single shock | 90/90-21 |
| Steering Head Angle | - | 63.5° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 300 mm / 6.3 in. | Single 220mm disc 1 piston caliper |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 180 mm / 7.1 in. | 140/80-18 |
| Electrical Systems |
| Lighting system | Dual 30W Krypton multireflector headlights and 21/5W brakelight | - |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | 245 mm | - |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | 9.6 inches | - |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 250 mm | - |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 9.8 inches | - |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc. Hydraulic | - |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc. Hydraulic | - |
| Tyres - Front | 80/100-21 | - |
| Tyres - Rear | 100/100-18 | - |
Verdict
⚖️
Too close to call
The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F and the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.
Key Differences
2012 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages
- 🔄More rear wheel travel: 180 mm vs 140/80-18 - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
- 🔄More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs Single 220mm disc 1 piston caliper - greater compliance over rough surfaces.
2014 Husaberg TE 300 - Advantages
- 🌡️Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
- 🏔️More ground clearance: 385 mm vs 366 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
2012 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2014 Husaberg TE 300 - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F and 2014 Husaberg TE 300?
The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 is powered by Two stroke, single-cylinder.
Which should I buy, the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F or the 2014 Husaberg TE 300?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F has the edge in higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel, while the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 stands out for liquid cooling and greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.