2012 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2013 Honda CRF 250L

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2012 Yamaha WR 250F 2012 Yamaha WR 250F

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Titanium valves
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
256.0 pounds
2013 Honda CRF 250L 2013 Honda CRF 250L

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
317.5 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Comments-Model ID: CRF150RB
ColoursBlue/WhiteRed/white
Warranty30 Day (Limited Factory Warranty)-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)366 mm255 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)14.4 inches10.0 inches
Seat Height980 mm / 38.6 in.875 mm / 34.4 in.
Wheelbase1,481 mm / 58.3 in.1,445 mm / 56.9 in.
Height1,298 mm / 51.1 in.1,195 mm / 47.0 in.
Length2,164 mm / 85.2 in.2,195 mm / 86.4 in.
Width826 mm / 32.5 in.815 mm / 32.1 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-1.80 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.12 quarts
Fuel Capacity7.95 litres / 2.10 gallons7.70 litres / 2.03 gallons
Wet Weight116.1 kg / 256.0 lbs144.0 kg / 317.5 lbs
Performance
Max Torque-22.00 Nm (2.2 kgf-m or 16.2 ft.lbs) @ 7000
Engine
CO2-72.4 CO
Bore x Stroke (mm)77.0 x 53.6 mm76.0 x 55.0 mm
Displacement (ci)15.26 cubic inches15.26 cubic inches
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, four-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Fuel ControlDOHCDOHC
Displacement (cc)250.00 cc250.00 cc
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.0 x 2.1 inches3.0 x 2.2 inches
Engine DetailTitanium valves-
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Keihin FCR 37Injection. Programmed fuel injection system (PGM-FI)
Compression Ratio12.5:110.7:1
Emissions-Consult owners manual for optional racing parts.
Engine LubricationWet, multidisc-
Fuel Consumption-3.12 litres/100 km (32.1 km/l or 75.39 mpg)
IgnitionCDIFull-transistor battery ignition
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System54
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multiplateWet multiplate with coil springs
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed6-speed
Primary DriveConstant-mesh 5-speedConstant mesh
Chassis
Frame Type-Semi-double cradle. Swing arm: Rear wheel travel.
Suspension - FrontInverted forkTelescopic (Inverted) 43mm diameter slide pipe
Suspension - RearSingle shockSwing arm (Pro-link suspension system) 40mm diameter cylinder
Rake-27.0°
Trail-113 mm / 4.4 in.
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 6.3 in.61 mm / 2.4 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear180 mm / 7.1 in.282 mm / 11.1 in.
Electrical Systems
Lighting systemDual 30W Krypton multireflector headlights and 21/5W brakelight-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)9.8 inches10.1 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)245 mm220 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.6 inches8.7 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)250 mm256 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. HydraulicSingle disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle disc. HydraulicSingle disc. Hydraulic. Single-piston caliper.
Rims-Brakes Front
Tyres - Front80/100-213.00-21
Tyres - Rear100/100-18120/80-P18

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Honda CRF 250L

The 2013 Honda CRF 250L edges out the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F thanks to its lower seat height, fuel injection and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2012 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 366 mm vs 255 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs 61 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2013 Honda CRF 250L - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 875 mm vs 980 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • More rear wheel travel: 282 mm vs 180 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2012 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2013 Honda CRF 250L - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F or the 2013 Honda CRF 250L?
The 2013 Honda CRF 250L has the lower seat at 875 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F sits higher at 980 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 Yamaha WR 250F or the 2013 Honda CRF 250L?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 Yamaha WR 250F has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher front wheel travel, while the 2013 Honda CRF 250L stands out for lower seat height and fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.