2008 Yamaha FZ6 vs 2009 Ducati Monster 696

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2008 Yamaha FZ6 2008 Yamaha FZ6

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
410.0 pounds
2009 Ducati Monster 696 2009 Ducati Monster 696

Naked bike

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
354.9 pounds
Full Specifications
General
ColoursRaven, cobalt blueRed (red/black), Matte Black (black/black), White (black/black)
Dimensions
Seat Height795 mm / 31.3 in.770 mm / 30.3 in.
Wheelbase1,440 mm / 56.7 in.1,450 mm / 57.1 in.
Height1,209 mm / 47.6 in.-
Length2,096 mm / 82.5 in.-
Width749 mm / 29.5 in.-
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight186 kg / 410.0 lbs161 kg / 354.9 lbs
Fuel Capacity19.30 litres / 5.10 gallons15.00 litres / 3.96 gallons
Performance
Max Torque-50.60 Nm (5.2 kgf-m or 37.3 ft.lbs)
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.4898 HP/kg
Engine
Fuel ControlDOHCDesmodromic valve control
Bore x Stroke (in,)2.6 x 1.8 inches3.5 x 2.3 inches
Engine TypeIn-line fourV2, four-stroke
Displacement (ci)36.61 cubic inches42.47 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)600.00 cc696.00 cc
Stroke4-
Bore x Stroke (mm)65.5 x 44.5 mm88.0 x 57.2 mm
Fuel SystemInjection. Group Fuel Injection, 36mm throttle bodiesInjection. Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle body
Compression Ratio12.2:110.7:1
Exhaust-2 aluminium mufflers
IgnitionTCI-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System42
Drivetrain
Clutch-APTC wet multiplate with hydraulic control
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Chassis
Frame Type-Tubular steel trellis frame
Suspension - Front43mm telescopic fork, 5.1-in travelShowa 43mm upside-down forks
Suspension - RearSingle shockProgressive linkage with preload and rebound Sachs adjustable monoshock
Rake25.0°24.0°
Trail97 mm / 3.8 in.-
Wheel Travel - Front-120 mm / 4.7 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear130 mm / 5.1 in.148 mm / 5.8 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)245 mm245 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.6 inches9.6 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)298 mm320 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)11.7 inches12.6 inches
Brakes - FrontDouble discDouble disc
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc
Tyres - Front120/70-ZR17120/60-ZR17
Tyres - Rear180/55-ZR17160/60-ZR17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2009 Ducati Monster 696

The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 edges out the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 thanks to its lighter kerb weight, lower seat height and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2008 Yamaha FZ6 - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2008 Yamaha FZ6 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2009 Ducati Monster 696 - Advantages

  • Lighter: 161 kg vs 186 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Lower seat height: 770 mm vs 795 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • More rear wheel travel: 148 mm vs 130 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2008 Yamaha FZ6 vs 2009 Ducati Monster 696 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 and 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2008 Yamaha FZ6 uses In-line four, while the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is powered by V2, four-stroke.
Which is lighter, the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 186 kg for the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 - a difference of 25 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 has the lower seat at 770 mm, making it more accessible. The 2008 Yamaha FZ6 sits higher at 795 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 or the 2009 Ducati Monster 696?
Both are strong choices. The 2008 Yamaha FZ6 has its own strengths, while the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 stands out for lighter kerb weight and lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.