2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 vs 2009 BMW K 1300GT

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 2006 Yamaha FJR 1300

Sport touring

Engine
In-line four
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
590.8 pounds
2009 BMW K 1300GT 2009 BMW K 1300GT

Sport touring

Engine
In-line four
Power
127 kW / 173 hp @ 9250 rpm
Top Speed
252.2 km/h / 156.7 mph
Weight
634.9 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year-2009
Colours-Beige, blue, red
Make Model-BMW K 1300GT
Dimensions
Seat Heigth -Alternate (mm)-840 mm
Seat Heigth -Alternate (in.)-33.1 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)135 mm-
Ground Clearance (in.)5.3 inches-
Seat Height805 mm / 31.7 in.820 - 840 mm / 32.3 - 33.1 in (low seat 800- 820 mm / 31.5 - 32.3 in)
Wheelbase1,550 mm / 61.0 in.1,572 mm / 61.9 in.
Height1,330 mm / 52.4 in.1,438 mm / 56.6 in.
Length2,240 mm / 88.2 in.2,318 mm / 91.3 in.
Width745 mm / 29.3 in.965 mm / 38.0 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight268 kg / 590.8 lbs255 kg / 562.2 lbs
Fuel Capacity25.00 litres / 6.61 gallons19 L / 5.0 US gal
Wet Weight-255 kg / 562 lbs
Performance
Top Speed-252.2 km/h / 156.7 mph
Max Power-127 kW / 173 hp @ 9250 rpm
Max Torque134.40140 Nm / 14.3 kgf-m / 103 lb-ft @ 8250 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.5279 HP/kg0.6275 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile-11.4 sec
Engine
Displacement (cc)1298.00 cc-
Displacement (ci)79.20 cubic inches-
Engine TypeIn-line fourIn-line four
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.1 x 2.6 inches-
Fuel ControlDOHCDOHC
Stroke44
Bore x Stroke (mm)79.0 x 66.2 mm-
Displacement-1298 cc / 79.2 cu in.
Engine Detail-Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel SystemInjection. Electronic fuel injectionInjection. Electronic intake pipe injection/digital engine management including knock sensor (BMS-K)
Bore x Stroke-80 x 64.3 mm / 3.15 x 2.53"
Compression Ratio10.8:113.0:1
Cooling System-Liquid cooled
Engine LubricationWet sump-
Exhaust-Closed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard EU-3
Exhaust management-Fully controlled three-way catalyst
Fuel Consumption-6.2 L/100 km 16.1 km/l / 37.9 US mpg
Fuel Induction-Electronic fuel injection, Digital Motor Electronics with integrated knock control (BMS-K)
Fuel Reserve-4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons
IgnitionTCI-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multiple discMultiple-plate clutch in oil bath, hydraulically operated
Final DriveChainShaft
Gear Ratios-1st 2.398 / 2nd 1.871 / 3rd 1.525 / 4th 1.296 / 5th 1.143 / 6th 1.015:1
Gearbox5-speed6-speed
Transmission / Drive-6 Speed
Chassis
Frame Type-Bridge frame, aluminium, load-bearing engine
Suspension - FrontTelescopic fork, 48mmBMW Motorrad Duolever; central spring strut, Paralever; central spring strut with lever system
Suspension - RearSwingarm (Link-type)Cast aluminium single swing arm with BMW Motorrad, spring pre-tension with infinite hydraulic adjustment
Rake-29.4°
Trail-112 mm / 4.4 in.
Wheel Travel - Front135 mm / 5.3 in.115 mm / 4.5 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear125 mm / 4.9 in.135 mm / 5.3 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches12.6 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm320 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)11.1 inches11.6 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)282 mm294 mm
Brakes - FrontDouble disc2 x ∅320mm discs, 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle ∅265mm disc, 2 piston caliper
Tyres - Front120/70-ZR17120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear180/55-ZR17180/55 ZR17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2009 BMW K 1300GT

The 2009 BMW K 1300GT edges out the 2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 thanks to its liquid cooling and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 - Advantages

  • More front wheel travel: 135 mm vs 115 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2009 BMW K 1300GT - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • More rear wheel travel: 135 mm vs 125 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 vs 2009 BMW K 1300GT - FAQs

Which is lighter, the 2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 or the 2009 BMW K 1300GT?
The 2009 BMW K 1300GT is lighter at 255 kg compared to 268 kg for the 2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 - a difference of 13 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 or the 2009 BMW K 1300GT?
The 2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 has the lower seat at 805 mm, making it more accessible. The 2009 BMW K 1300GT sits higher at 820 - 840 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 or the 2009 BMW K 1300GT?
Both are strong choices. The 2006 Yamaha FJR 1300 has the edge in higher front wheel travel, while the 2009 BMW K 1300GT stands out for liquid cooling and higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.