2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS vs 2000 BMW K 1200RS

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS

Sport touring

Engine
Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Power
145 hp / 105.7 kW @ 8500 rpm
Top Speed
249 km/h / 154.7 mph
Weight
291 kg / 641.5 lbs
2000 BMW K 1200RS 2000 BMW K 1200RS

Sport touring

Engine
In-line four
Power
N/A
Top Speed
225.0 km/h / 139.8 mph
Weight
582.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year2003-
Colours-Red, gray, silver/blue for extra charge
Make ModelYamaha FJR 1300 / ABS-
Dimensions
Seat Heigth -Alternate (mm)-800 mm
Seat Heigth -Alternate (in.)-31.5 inches
Seat Height805 mm / 31.7 in to 825 mm / 32.5 in770 mm / 30.3 in.
Wheelbase1545 mm / 60.8 in1,555 mm / 61.2 in.
Ground Clearance130 mm / 5.1 in-
Height1450mm / 57.1 in-
Length2230 mm / 87.8 in-
Width750 mm / 29.5 in-
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight264 kg / 582 lbs264 kg / 582.0 lbs
Fuel Capacity25 Liters / 6.6 US gal20.50 litres / 5.42 gallons
Wet Weight291 kg / 641.5 lbs-
Performance
Top Speed249 km/h / 154.7 mph225.0 km/h / 139.8 mph
Max Power145 hp / 105.7 kW @ 8500 rpm-
Max Torque125 Nm / 13.7kgf-m / 99.1 ft-lb @ 6000 rpm117.00
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.4924 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile11.0 sec-
Engine
Engine Type-In-line four
Displacement (cc)-1171.00 cc
Displacement (ci)-71.45 cubic inches
Stroke-4
Displacement1298 cc / 79.2 cu-in cc / 79.2 cu-in-
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.-
Bore x Stroke79 x 66.2 mm-
Compression Ratio10.8:1-
Cooling SystemLiquid cooled,-
Fuel Consumption18.5 km/lit-
Fuel InductionMikuni 42mm throttle body F.I.-
IgnitionCDI -
LubricationWet sump-
Spark PlugNGK, CR8E-
StarterElectric-
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multiple discs, hydraulic operated-
Final DriveShaft-
Gearbox-6-speed
Transmission / Drive5 Speed -
Chassis
Frame TypeAluminium, twin spar-
Suspension - Front48mm Soqi telescopic fork w/adjustable preload, compression and rebound damping-
Suspension - RearSingle shock, link-type, w/adjustable preload and rebound damping-
Rake26°-
Trail109 mm / 4.3 in-
Wheel Travel - Front137 mm / 5.3 in-
Wheel Travel - Rear122 mm / 5.1 in-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front2x 320mm discs 4 piston calipersDual disc
Brakes - RearSingle 283mm disc 2 piston caliperSingle disc
Tyres - Front120/70 ZR17-
Tyres - Rear180/55 ZR17-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2000 BMW K 1200RS

The 2000 BMW K 1200RS edges out the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS thanks to its lighter kerb weight and lower seat height. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.

2000 BMW K 1200RS - Advantages

  • Lighter: 264 kg vs 291 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Lower seat height: 770 mm vs 805 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS vs 2000 BMW K 1200RS - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS and 2000 BMW K 1200RS?
The 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS uses Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder., while the 2000 BMW K 1200RS is powered by In-line four.
Which is lighter, the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS or the 2000 BMW K 1200RS?
The 2000 BMW K 1200RS is lighter at 264 kg compared to 291 kg for the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS - a difference of 27 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS or the 2000 BMW K 1200RS?
The 2000 BMW K 1200RS has the lower seat at 770 mm, making it more accessible. The 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS sits higher at 805 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS or the 2000 BMW K 1200RS?
Both are strong choices. The 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS has the edge in liquid cooling, while the 2000 BMW K 1200RS stands out for lighter kerb weight and lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.