2000 Yamaha DT 125R vs 2017 KTM 150 XC-W
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | - | Orange/white/black |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | - | 14.6 inches |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | - | 370 mm |
| Seat Height | 885 mm / 34.8 in. | 960 mm / 37.8 in. |
| Wheelbase | - | 1,471 mm / 57.9 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 109 kg / 240.3 lbs | 91.5 kg / 201.7 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | - | 9.50 litres / 2.51 gallons |
| Performance |
| Max Torque | 13.00 Nm (1.3 kgf-m or 9.6 ft.lbs) @ 6500 | - |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | 0.1193 HP/kg | - |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | - | 58.0 x 54.5 mm |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | - | 2.3 x 2.1 inches |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, two-stroke | Single cylinder, two-stroke |
| Displacement (ci) | 7.57 cubic inches | 8.78 cubic inches |
| Displacement (cc) | 124.00 cc | 143.90 cc |
| Engine Detail | - | Reed intake. |
| Fuel System | - | Carburettor |
| Ignition | - | Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment, type Kokusan |
| Starter | - | Kick |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Multi-plate clutch, Brembo hydraulics |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Primary Drive | - | 14:50. Primary drive: 23:73. |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | 25CrMo4 steel central-tube frame |
| Suspension - Front | - | WP XPlor 48 upside-down fork |
| Suspension - Rear | - | WP Xplor PDS shock absorber |
| Rake | - | 26.5° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 300 mm / 11.8 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 310 mm / 12.2 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 10.2 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 260 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 8.7 inches |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc | Single disc. Four-piston calipers. |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single disc. Two-piston calipers. |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2000 Yamaha DT 125R
The 2000 Yamaha DT 125R edges out the 2017 KTM 150 XC-W thanks to its lower seat height. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2000 Yamaha DT 125R - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 885 mm vs 960 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2017 KTM 150 XC-W - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 2017 KTM 150 XC-W matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2000 Yamaha DT 125R vs 2017 KTM 150 XC-W - FAQs
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2000 Yamaha DT 125R or the 2017 KTM 150 XC-W?
The 2000 Yamaha DT 125R has the lower seat at 885 mm, making it more accessible. The 2017 KTM 150 XC-W sits higher at 960 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2000 Yamaha DT 125R or the 2017 KTM 150 XC-W?
Both are strong choices. The 2000 Yamaha DT 125R has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2017 KTM 150 XC-W offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.