MotoSpecs

1992 Suzuki RGV 250 vs 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
1992 Suzuki RGV 250 1992 Suzuki RGV 250

Sport

Engine
Two stroke, 90° V- twin, reed valve
Power
45.5 kW / 61 hp @ 11000 rpm
Top Speed
205.4 km/h / 127.6 mph
Weight
161 kg / 355 lbs
2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3

Sport

Engine
Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder
Power
30.9 kW 41.4 hp @ 10750 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
169 kg / 373 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year19922018
ModelSuzuki RGV 250-
Make Model-Yamaha YZF-R 3
Dimensions
Seat Height755 mm / 29.7 in779.7 mm / 30.7 in
Wheelbase1375 mm / 54.1 in1379.2 mm / 54.3 in
Ground Clearance120 mm / 4.7 in160 mm / 6.2 in
Height1065 mm / 41.9 in1 135.3 mm / 44.7 in
Length2015 mm / 79.3 in2090 mm / 82.3 in
Turning Circle3.1 m / 10.2 ft-
Width695 mm / 27.4 in718.8 mm / 28.3 in
Weights & Capacities
Fuel Capacity17 Litres / 4.5 US gal / 3.7 Imp gal14 Litres / 3.7 US gal
Oil Capacity1.1 Litres / 12 US qt / 1.0 Imp qt-
Wet Weight161 kg / 355 lbs169 kg / 373 lbs
Performance
Top Speed205.4 km/h / 127.6 mph-
Braking (100 km/h - 0)36.0 m / 118 ft-
Braking (60 km/h - 0)12.4 m / 40.7 ft-
Max Power45.5 kW / 61 hp @ 11000 rpm30.9 kW 41.4 hp @ 10750 rpm
Max Power - Rear Tyre43.3 kW / 58 hp @ 11000rpm-
Max Torque40 Nm / 4.1 kgf-m / 29.5 lb-ft @ 8000 rpm29.6 Nm / 3.0 kg-m @ 9000 rpm
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.5 sec / 167.8 km/ / 104.3 mph-
Engine
Displacement249 cc / 15.2 cu in321 cc / 19.5 cu-in
Engine DetailTwo stroke, 90° V- twin, reed valveFour stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder
Bore x Stroke56 x 50.6 mm68.0 x 44.1mm
Compression Ratio7.3 :111.2:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
Fuel Consumption8.0 L/100 km / 12.5 km/l / 29.4 US mpg / 35.3 Imp mpg-
Fuel Induction2 x Mikuni TM34SS semi-flat carburetorsElectronic Fuel Injection, 32 mm throttle body
IgnitionPointless Electrical IgnitionTCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Lubrication-Wet sump
Spark PlugNGK BR9ES-
StarterKickElectric
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity12V, 5Ah-
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-plateWet, multiple-disc coil spring
Final DriveChain, DID520V2, 114 linksO-ring chain
Gear Ratios1st 2.454 (27/11) / 2nd 1.625 (26/16) / 3rd 1.235 (21/17) / 4th 1.045 (23/22) / 5th 0.916 (22/24) / 6th 0.840 (21/25)-
Primary Drive Ratios2.565 (59/23)-
Transmission / Drive6 Speed, constant meshConstant Mesh, 6-speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTwin spar, aluminiumDelta box
Suspension - FrontUSD telescopic fork, 5-way adjustable with anti-dive, oil dampened41mm KYBø telescopic fork
Suspension - RearFull Floater, mono-shock, gas/oil damped, 7-way adjustableAdjustable KYB® single shock
Lean Angle58°-
Rake25o25°
Trail94 mm / 3.7 in93.9 mm / 3.7 in
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in130 mm / 5.1 in
Wheel Travel - Rear140 mm / 5.5 in124.4 mm / 4.9 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front2 x 300 mm Discs ,4 piston calipersSingle 298mm disc 2 piston caliper
Brakes - RearSingle 210 mm disc, 1 piston caliperSingle 220mm disc 1 piston caliper
Tyres - Front110/70-17110/70-17M/C 54H
Tyres - Rear140/60-18140/70-17M/C 66H

Verdict

Winner on specs

2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3

The 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3 edges out the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 thanks to its fuel injection, greater ground clearance, higher front wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

1992 Suzuki RGV 250 - Advantages

  • Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3 - Advantages

  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Larger displacement: 321 cc vs 249 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More ground clearance: 160 mm vs 120 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More front wheel travel: 130 mm vs 120 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

1992 Suzuki RGV 250 vs 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 and 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3?
The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 uses Two stroke, 90° V- twin, reed valve, while the 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3 is powered by Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Which is lighter, the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or the 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3?
The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 169 kg for the 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3 - a difference of 8 kg. This is a small difference unlikely to be a deciding factor in everyday riding.
Which has the larger fuel tank, the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or the 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3?
The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 has the larger tank at approximately 17 litres vs 14 litres for the 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 283-340 km vs 233-280 km between stops.
Which should I buy, the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or the 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3?
Both are strong choices. The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 has the edge in larger fuel tank and dual front discs, while the 2018 Yamaha YZF-R 3 stands out for fuel injection and greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Suzuki RGV 250 years All Yamaha YZF-R 3 years
Build your own comparison →