MotoSpecs

1992 Suzuki RGV 250 vs 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
1992 Suzuki RGV 250 1992 Suzuki RGV 250

Sport

Engine
Two stroke, 90° V- twin, reed valve
Power
45.5 kW / 61 hp @ 11000 rpm
Top Speed
205.4 km/h / 127.6 mph
Weight
161 kg / 355 lbs
2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300

Sport

Engine
Four stroke . parallel twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
29.0 kW / 39 hp @ 11000 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
172 kg / 379.1 lbs - ABS 174 kg / 383.6 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year19922015
ModelSuzuki RGV 250-
Make Model-Kawasaki Ninja 300
Dimensions
Seat Height755 mm / 29.7 in785 mm / 30.8 in
Wheelbase1375 mm / 54.1 in1405 mm / 55.3 in
Ground Clearance120 mm / 4.7 in140 mm / 5.5 in
Height1065 mm / 41.9 in1110 mm / 43.7 in
Length2015 mm / 79.3 in2015 mm / 79.3 in
Turning Circle3.1 m / 10.2 ft-
Width695 mm / 27.4 in715 mm / 29.1 in
Weights & Capacities
Fuel Capacity17 Litres / 4.5 US gal / 3.7 Imp gal17 Litres / 3.8 US gal
Oil Capacity1.1 Litres / 12 US qt / 1.0 Imp qt-
Wet Weight161 kg / 355 lbs172 kg / 379.1 lbs - ABS 174 kg / 383.6 lbs
Performance
Top Speed205.4 km/h / 127.6 mph-
Braking (100 km/h - 0)36.0 m / 118 ft-
Braking (60 km/h - 0)12.4 m / 40.7 ft-
Max Power45.5 kW / 61 hp @ 11000 rpm29.0 kW / 39 hp @ 11000 rpm
Max Power - Rear Tyre43.3 kW / 58 hp @ 11000rpm-
Max Torque40 Nm / 4.1 kgf-m / 29.5 lb-ft @ 8000 rpm27.0 Nm / 2.8 kg-fm @ 10000 rpm
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.5 sec / 167.8 km/ / 104.3 mph-
Engine
Displacement249 cc / 15.2 cu in296 cc / 18.0 cu-in
Engine DetailTwo stroke, 90° V- twin, reed valveFour stroke . parallel twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Bore x Stroke56 x 50.6 mm62 x 49 mm
Compression Ratio7.3 :110.6:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
Fuel Consumption8.0 L/100 km / 12.5 km/l / 29.4 US mpg / 35.3 Imp mpg-
Fuel Induction2 x Mikuni TM34SS semi-flat carburetorsFuel injection: Ø32 mm x 2 (Keihin), with dual throttle valves
IgnitionPointless Electrical IgnitionTCBI with Digital Advance
Lubrication-Forced lubrication, wet sump
Spark PlugNGK BR9ES-
StarterKickElectric
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity12V, 5Ah-
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-plateWet multi-disc, manual
Final DriveChain, DID520V2, 114 linksChain
Final Drive Ratio-3.000 (42/14)
Gear Ratios1st 2.454 (27/11) / 2nd 1.625 (26/16) / 3rd 1.235 (21/17) / 4th 1.045 (23/22) / 5th 0.916 (22/24) / 6th 0.840 (21/25)1st 2.714 (38/14) 2nd 1.789 (34/19) 3rd 1.409 (31/22) 4th 1.160 (29/25) 5th 1.000 (27/27) 6th 0.893 (25/28)
Primary Drive Ratios2.565 (59/23)3.087 (71/23)
Transmission / Drive6 Speed, constant mesh6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTwin spar, aluminiumTube diamond, steel
Suspension - FrontUSD telescopic fork, 5-way adjustable with anti-dive, oil dampened37 mm Telescopic fork,
Suspension - RearFull Floater, mono-shock, gas/oil damped, 7-way adjustableBottom-Link Uni-Trak with gas-charged shock and 5-way adjustable preload,
Lean Angle58°-
Rake25o 27°
Trail94 mm / 3.7 in93 mm / 3.6 in
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear140 mm / 5.5 in132 mm / 5.1 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front2 x 300 mm Discs ,4 piston calipersSingle 290 mm petal disc Single balanced actuation dual-piston
Brakes - RearSingle 210 mm disc, 1 piston caliperSingle 220 mm petal disc Caliper: Dual-piston
Tyres - Front110/70-17110/70-17 M/C 54S
Tyres - Rear140/60-18140/70-17 M/C 66S

Verdict

Winner on specs

1992 Suzuki RGV 250

The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 edges out the 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300 thanks to its lighter kerb weight, lower seat height, dual front discs and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

1992 Suzuki RGV 250 - Advantages

  • Lighter: 161 kg vs 172 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Lower seat height: 755 mm vs 785 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More rear wheel travel: 140 mm vs 132 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300 - Advantages

  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Larger displacement: 296 cc vs 249 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More ground clearance: 140 mm vs 120 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.

1992 Suzuki RGV 250 vs 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 and 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300?
The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 uses Two stroke, 90° V- twin, reed valve, while the 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300 is powered by Four stroke . parallel twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Which is lighter, the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or the 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300?
The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 172 kg for the 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300 - a difference of 11 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or the 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300?
The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 has the lower seat at 755 mm, making it more accessible. The 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300 sits higher at 785 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 or the 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300?
Both are strong choices. The 1992 Suzuki RGV 250 has the edge in lighter kerb weight and lower seat height, while the 2015 Kawasaki Ninja 300 stands out for fuel injection and greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Suzuki RGV 250 years All Kawasaki Ninja 300 years
Build your own comparison →