2013 KTM 65 SX vs 2010 Honda CRF50F
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | Orange/black | Red |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 280 mm | 147 mm |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 11.0 inches | 5.8 inches |
| Seat Height | 750 mm / 29.5 in. | 549 mm / 21.6 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,137 mm / 44.8 in. | 914 mm / 36.0 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 55.5 kg / 122.4 lbs | - |
| Fuel Capacity | 3.50 litres / 0.92 gallons | 2.64 litres / 0.70 gallons |
| Wet Weight | - | 49.9 kg / 110.0 lbs |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 45.0 x 40.8 mm | 39.0 x 41.4 mm |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, two-stroke | Single cylinder, four-stroke |
| Displacement (ci) | 3.96 cubic inches | 2.99 cubic inches |
| Fuel Control | - | SOHC |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 1.8 x 1.6 inches | 1.5 x 1.6 inches |
| Displacement (cc) | 64.85 cc | 49.00 cc |
| Engine Detail | Reed intake. | - |
| Fuel System | - | Carburettor. 13mm piston-valve carburator |
| Compression Ratio | - | 10.0:1 |
| Engine Lubrication | Mixture oil lubrication | - |
| Fuel Reserve | - | 0.75 litres / 0.20 gallons |
| Ignition | Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment | CD |
| Starter | Kick | - |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated | Automatic |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 3-speed |
| Primary Drive | 14:48. Primary drive: 23:75 straight cut spur gear. | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Central tube frame of chrome molybdenum steel tubing, powder-coated | - |
| Suspension - Front | WP ?Suspension USD ?35 | Inverted telescopic fork |
| Suspension - Rear | WP ?Suspension ?3614 BAVP | Single-shock |
| Rake | 25.5° | 25.0° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 275 mm / 10.8 in. | 89 mm / 3.5 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 272 mm / 10.7 in. | 71 mm / 2.8 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | 160 mm | - |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | 6.3 inches | - |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 198 mm | - |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 7.8 inches | - |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc. Four-piston calipers. | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc. Two-piston calipers. | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tyres - Front | - | 2.50-10 |
| Tyres - Rear | - | 2.50-10 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2013 KTM 65 SX
The 2013 KTM 65 SX edges out the 2010 Honda CRF50F thanks to its greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2013 KTM 65 SX - Advantages
- 🏔️More ground clearance: 280 mm vs 147 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
- 🔄More rear wheel travel: 272 mm vs 71 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
- 🔄More front wheel travel: 275 mm vs 89 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.
2010 Honda CRF50F - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 549 mm vs 750 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2013 KTM 65 SX vs 2010 Honda CRF50F - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2013 KTM 65 SX and 2010 Honda CRF50F?
The 2013 KTM 65 SX uses Single cylinder, two-stroke, while the 2010 Honda CRF50F is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2013 KTM 65 SX is a two-stroke engine while the 2010 Honda CRF50F runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 KTM 65 SX or the 2010 Honda CRF50F?
The 2010 Honda CRF50F has the lower seat at 549 mm, making it more accessible. The 2013 KTM 65 SX sits higher at 750 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 KTM 65 SX or the 2010 Honda CRF50F?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 KTM 65 SX has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2010 Honda CRF50F stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.