2013 KTM 50 SX vs 2010 Honda CRF50F
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | Orange/black | Red |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 9.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 252 mm | 147 mm |
| Seat Height | 684 mm / 26.9 in. | 549 mm / 21.6 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,032 mm / 40.6 in. | 914 mm / 36.0 in. |
| Height | 1,140 mm / 44.9 in. | - |
| Length | 2,090 mm / 82.3 in. | - |
| Width | 830 mm / 32.7 in. | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 41.5 kg / 91.5 lbs | - |
| Fuel Capacity | 2.30 litres / 0.61 gallons | 2.64 litres / 0.70 gallons |
| Wet Weight | - | 49.9 kg / 110.0 lbs |
| Performance |
| Max Torque | 9.20 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000 Revolutions | - |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | 0.0815 HP/kg | - |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 1.6 x 1.6 inches | 1.5 x 1.6 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 39.5 x 40.0 mm | 39.0 x 41.4 mm |
| Displacement (cc) | 49.00 cc | 49.00 cc |
| Displacement (ci) | 2.99 cubic inches | 2.99 cubic inches |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, two-stroke | Single cylinder, four-stroke |
| Fuel Control | Single Overhead Cams (SOHC) | SOHC |
| Engine Detail | Reed intake. | - |
| Fuel System | Carburettor | Carburettor. 13mm piston-valve carburator |
| Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Engine Lubrication | Mixture oil lubrication | - |
| Fuel Reserve | - | 0.75 litres / 0.20 gallons |
| Ignition | SELETTRA 2p D36 | CD |
| Starter | Kick | - |
| Valve System | 2 | - |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | 3-lining automatic clutch on the main shaft / centrifugal force | Automatic |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 3-speed |
| Primary Drive | 11:40. Primary drive: 33:61 straight cut spur gear. | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Central tube frame of chrome molybdenum steel tubing, powder-coated | - |
| Suspension - Front | WP ?Suspension USD ?35 | Inverted telescopic fork |
| Suspension - Rear | WP ?Suspension ?3614 BAEM | Single-shock |
| Rake | 24.0° | 25.0° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 205 mm / 8.1 in. | 89 mm / 3.5 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 185 mm / 7.3 in. | 71 mm / 2.8 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 160 mm | - |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 6.3 inches | - |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | 5.5 inches | - |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | 140 mm | - |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc. Four-piston calipers. | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc. Two-piston calipers. | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tyres - Front | 100/80-17 | 2.50-10 |
| Tyres - Rear | 110/80-17 | 2.50-10 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2013 KTM 50 SX
The 2013 KTM 50 SX edges out the 2010 Honda CRF50F thanks to its greater ground clearance, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2013 KTM 50 SX - Advantages
- 🏔️More ground clearance: 252 mm vs 147 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
- 🔄More rear wheel travel: 185 mm vs 71 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
- 🔄More front wheel travel: 205 mm vs 89 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.
2010 Honda CRF50F - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 549 mm vs 684 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2013 KTM 50 SX vs 2010 Honda CRF50F - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2013 KTM 50 SX and 2010 Honda CRF50F?
The 2013 KTM 50 SX uses Single cylinder, two-stroke, while the 2010 Honda CRF50F is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2013 KTM 50 SX is a two-stroke engine while the 2010 Honda CRF50F runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 KTM 50 SX or the 2010 Honda CRF50F?
The 2010 Honda CRF50F has the lower seat at 549 mm, making it more accessible. The 2013 KTM 50 SX sits higher at 684 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2013 KTM 50 SX or the 2010 Honda CRF50F?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 KTM 50 SX has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2010 Honda CRF50F stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.