2012 KTM 300 XC-W vs 2013 KTM 300 EXC

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2012 KTM 300 XC-W 2012 KTM 300 XC-W

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
643.9 pounds
2013 KTM 300 EXC 2013 KTM 300 EXC

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
229.3 pounds
Full Specifications
General
ColoursOrange/white/blackOrange/black
Warranty12 Months-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)355 mm355 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)14.0 inches14.0 inches
Seat Height960 mm / 37.8 in.960 mm / 37.8 in.
Wheelbase1,482 mm / 58.3 in.1,482 mm / 58.3 in.
Height1,146 mm / 45.1 in.1,140 mm / 44.9 in.
Length2,065 mm / 81.3 in.2,090 mm / 82.3 in.
Width1,204 mm / 47.4 in.830 mm / 32.7 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight102 kg / 224.9 lbs104 kg / 229.3 lbs
Fuel Capacity9.50 litres / 2.51 gallons9.50 litres / 2.51 gallons
Wet Weight292.1 kg / 643.9 lbs-
Performance
Mods from previous modelCompletely new frame design with PDS that reduces longitudinal stiffness.-
Max Torque-9.20 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.8 ft.lbs) @ 7000 Revolutions
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.0815 HP/kg
Engine
Fuel ControlSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)Single Overhead Cams (SOHC)
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Displacement (ci)17.88 cubic inches17.88 cubic inches
Bore x Stroke (in,)2.8 x 2.8 inches2.8 x 2.8 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)72.0 x 72.0 mm72.0 x 72.0 mm
Displacement (cc)293.00 cc293.00 cc
Engine DetailReed intake and exhaust control. New V-Force reed valve block.Reed intake.
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Keihin CVK34Carburettor
Compression Ratio8.3:110.6:1
Engine LubricationMixture oil 1:60-
Ignition-Contactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment, type Kokusan
StarterElectric & kickElectric & kick
Valve System-2
Drivetrain
ClutchMultidisc clutch in oil bath/hydraulically activatedWet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary DrivePrimary transmission 26:72. Secondary ratio 13:50. 5/8 x 1/414:50 (13:50). Primary drive: 26:72.
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubingCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubing
Suspension - FrontWPSuspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PAWP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PA
Suspension - RearWPSuspension PDS 5018 DCCWP ?Suspension PDS 5018 DCC
Rake-26.5°
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in.300 mm / 11.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear335 mm / 13.2 in.335 mm / 13.2 in.
Electrical Systems
Lighting system30W x 2 halogen-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)260 mm280 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.2 inches11.0 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm240 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearingsSingle disc
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearingsSingle disc
Tyres - Front25/8-12100/80-17
Tyres - Rear120/90-18110/80-17

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2012 KTM 300 XC-W and the 2013 KTM 300 EXC are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2012 KTM 300 XC-W - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2012 KTM 300 XC-W matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 KTM 300 EXC - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2013 KTM 300 EXC matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2012 KTM 300 XC-W vs 2013 KTM 300 EXC - FAQs

Which should I buy, the 2012 KTM 300 XC-W or the 2013 KTM 300 EXC?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 KTM 300 XC-W has its own strengths, while the 2013 KTM 300 EXC offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.