2012 KTM 300 XC-W vs 2014 Husaberg TE 300

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2012 KTM 300 XC-W 2012 KTM 300 XC-W

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
643.9 pounds
2014 Husaberg TE 300 2014 Husaberg TE 300

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Two stroke, single-cylinder
Power
NA
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
103 kg / 226 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year-2013 - 14
ColoursOrange/white/black-
Make Model-Husaberg TE 300
Warranty12 Months-
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)355 mm-
Ground Clearance (in.)14.0 inches-
Seat Height960 mm / 37.8 in.985 mm / 38.7 in
Wheelbase1,482 mm / 58.3 in.1475 +± 10 mm / 58.0 in
Ground Clearance-385 mm / 15.1 in
Height1,146 mm / 45.1 in.-
Length2,065 mm / 81.3 in.-
Width1,204 mm / 47.4 in.-
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight102 kg / 224.9 lbs-
Fuel Capacity9.50 litres / 2.51 gallons11 Litres / 2.9 US gal
Wet Weight292.1 kg / 643.9 lbs103 kg / 226 lbs
Performance
Mods from previous modelCompletely new frame design with PDS that reduces longitudinal stiffness.-
Max Power-NA
Max Torque-NA
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)2.8 x 2.8 inches-
Displacement (cc)293.00 cc-
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-stroke-
Fuel ControlSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)-
Bore x Stroke (mm)72.0 x 72.0 mm-
Displacement (ci)17.88 cubic inches-
Displacement-293.2
Engine DetailReed intake and exhaust control. New V-Force reed valve block.Two stroke, single-cylinder
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Keihin CVK34-
Bore x Stroke-72 x 72 mm
Compression Ratio8.3:1-
Cooling System-Liquid cooled
Engine LubricationMixture oil 1:60-
Engine Oil Specification-Motorex, SAE 15W-50
Fuel Induction-Keihin PWK 36S AG
Ignition-Kokusan
StarterElectric & kickElectric & Kick
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity-12V 3Ah/12V 3Ah
Drivetrain
ClutchMultidisc clutch in oil bath/hydraulically activatedWet multi-disc clutch, hydraulically operated
Final DriveChainChain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Gearbox6-speed-
Primary DrivePrimary transmission 26:72. Secondary ratio 13:50. 5/8 x 1/4-
Transmission / Drive-6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubingCentral double-cradle-type 25CrMo4, Aluminium Subframe
Suspension - FrontWPSuspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PASingle 260mm 2 piston caliper
Suspension - RearWPSuspension PDS 5018 DCC90/90-21
Steering Head Angle-63.5°
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in.Single 220mm disc 1 piston caliper
Wheel Travel - Rear335 mm / 13.2 in.140/80-18
Electrical Systems
Lighting system30W x 2 halogen-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.2 inches-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)260 mm-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm-
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings-
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings-
Tyres - Front25/8-12-
Tyres - Rear120/90-18-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2012 KTM 300 XC-W

The 2012 KTM 300 XC-W edges out the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 thanks to its lower seat height, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2012 KTM 300 XC-W - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 960 mm vs 985 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 140/80-18 - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 300 mm vs Single 220mm disc 1 piston caliper - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2014 Husaberg TE 300 - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • More ground clearance: 385 mm vs 355 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.

2012 KTM 300 XC-W vs 2014 Husaberg TE 300 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2012 KTM 300 XC-W and 2014 Husaberg TE 300?
The 2012 KTM 300 XC-W uses Single cylinder, two-stroke, while the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 is powered by Two stroke, single-cylinder. This is a fundamental difference - the 2012 KTM 300 XC-W is a two-stroke engine while the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 KTM 300 XC-W or the 2014 Husaberg TE 300?
The 2012 KTM 300 XC-W has the lower seat at 960 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 Husaberg TE 300 sits higher at 985 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 KTM 300 XC-W or the 2014 Husaberg TE 300?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 KTM 300 XC-W has the edge in lower seat height and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2014 Husaberg TE 300 stands out for liquid cooling and greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.