MotoSpecs

2016 KTM 250 SX vs 2013 Kawasaki KX250F

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2016 KTM 250 SX 2016 KTM 250 SX

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
95.9 kg / 211.4 lbs
2013 Kawasaki KX250F 2013 Kawasaki KX250F

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
233.6 pounds
Full Specifications
General
ColoursOrange/white/blackLime Green
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)15.2 inches13.0 inches
Storage-Front and rear rack
Ground Clearance (mm)385 mm330 mm
Seat Height992 mm / 39.1 in.945 mm / 37.2 in.
Wheelbase1,495 mm / 58.9 in.1,476 mm / 58.1 in.
Height-1,270 mm / 50.0 in.
Length-2,169 mm / 85.4 in.
Width-820 mm / 32.3 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight95.9 kg / 211.4 lbs-
Fuel Capacity7.00 litres / 1.85 gallons6.09 litres / 1.61 gallons
Wet Weight-106.0 kg / 233.6 lbs
Performance
Max Torque-59.00 Nm (6.0 kgf-m or 43.5 ft.lbs) @ 5250 Revolutions
Engine
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Displacement (ci)15.19 cubic inches15.19 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)249.00 cc249.00 cc
Bore x Stroke (mm)66.4 x 72.0 mm77.0 x 53.6 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)2.6 x 2.8 inches3.0 x 2.1 inches
Fuel Control-DOHC
Engine DetailReed intake.-
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Keihin PWK 38S AGInjection. DFI with 43mm Keihin throttle body and dual injectors
Compression Ratio-13.8:1
IgnitionContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustment, type KokusanDigital DC-CDI
StarterKickElectric
Valve System-4
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics-
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Primary Drive13:48. Primary drive: 26:72. 520 X-ring chain.2WD / 4WD, shaft
Chassis
Frame TypeChrome-molybdenum steel central-tubeAluminum perimeter
Suspension - FrontWP USD closed cartridge ? 48 mm48mm inverted Showa SFF telescopic fork with 40-way spring preload adjustability and 22 position compression and 20 position rebound damping adjustability/ 12.4 in.
Suspension - RearWP shock absorber with linkageUni-Trak linkage system and Showa shock with 9 position low-speed and stepless high-speed compression damping, 22 position rebound damping and fully adjustable spring preload / 12.2 in.
Rake26.5°28.7°
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in.-
Wheel Travel - Rear300 mm / 11.8 in.-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm240 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)260 mm250 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.2 inches9.8 inches
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Four-piston calipers.Single disc. Petal disc with 2-piston caliper
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.Single disc. Petal disc with single-piston caliper
Tyres - Front-80/100-21
Tyres - Rear-100/90-19

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Kawasaki KX250F

The 2013 Kawasaki KX250F edges out the 2016 KTM 250 SX thanks to its lower seat height and fuel injection. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2016 KTM 250 SX - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 385 mm vs 330 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.

2013 Kawasaki KX250F - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 945 mm vs 992 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.

2016 KTM 250 SX vs 2013 Kawasaki KX250F - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2016 KTM 250 SX and 2013 Kawasaki KX250F?
The 2016 KTM 250 SX uses Single cylinder, two-stroke, while the 2013 Kawasaki KX250F is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2016 KTM 250 SX is a two-stroke engine while the 2013 Kawasaki KX250F runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2016 KTM 250 SX or the 2013 Kawasaki KX250F?
The 2013 Kawasaki KX250F has the lower seat at 945 mm, making it more accessible. The 2016 KTM 250 SX sits higher at 992 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2016 KTM 250 SX or the 2013 Kawasaki KX250F?
Both are strong choices. The 2016 KTM 250 SX has the edge in greater ground clearance, while the 2013 Kawasaki KX250F stands out for lower seat height and fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All KTM 250 SX years All Kawasaki KX250F years
Build your own comparison →