2014 KTM 200 XC-W vs 2015 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2015 Yamaha WR 250F

Full specifications comparison • 3 motorcycles

Comparing 3 motorcycles
2014 KTM 200 XC-W 2014 KTM 200 XC-W

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
45.1 km/h / 28.0 mph
Weight
246.9 pounds
2015 Yamaha WR 250F 2015 Yamaha WR 250F

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
74.6 mph
Weight
284.4 pounds
2015 Yamaha WR 250F 2015 Yamaha WR 250F

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Titanium valves
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
258.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsGerman brand.4500 Ah Lithium Polymer battery. Range 75km. XOR is an abbreviation of Xtraordinary Object on Road. Foldable bike. French brand.
Year-2014 - 15
ColoursOrange/blackRacing Blue
Make Model-Yamaha WR 250F
Warranty-30 Day (Limited Factory Warranty)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)14.0 inches13.2 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)355 mm335 mm
Storage-Boot for integral helmet
Seat Height960 mm / 37.8 in.965 mm / 38.0 in
Wheelbase1,471 mm / 57.9 in.1466 mm / 57.7 in
Ground Clearance-325 mm / 12.8 in
Height1,120 mm / 44.1 in.1,280 mm / 50.4 in.
Length2,120 mm / 83.5 in.2,164 mm / 85.2 in.
Width840 mm / 33.1 in.826 mm / 32.5 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-1.20 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.08 quarts
Dry Weight99.5 kg / 219.4 lbs59 kg / 130.1 lbs
Fuel Capacity10.00 litres / 2.64 gallons7.57 litres / 2.00 gallons
Wet Weight112.0 kg / 246.9 lbs117.0 kg / 258.0 lbs
Performance
Top Speed45.1 km/h / 28.0 mph120.0 km/h / 74.6 mph
Acceleration (0-100 km/h)-6.000 seconds
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.1819 HP/kg
Engine
Fuel Control-DOHC
Bore x Stroke (in,)2.5 x 2.4 inches3.0 x 2.1 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)64.0 x 60.0 mm77.0 x 53.6 mm
Displacement (cc)193.00 cc-
Displacement (ci)11.78 cubic inches-
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Displacement-249 cc / 15.2 cu-in
Engine DetailReed intake.Titanium valves
Fuel SystemCarburettorInjection. Yamaha Fuel Injection (YFI) Keihin 44mm
Bore x Stroke-77 x 53.6 mm
Compression Ratio-11.8:1
Cooling System-Liquid cooled
EmissionsEuro 2No direct emission
Engine Lubrication-Dry sump
ExhaustStainless steel exhaust-
Fuel Induction-Yamaha Fuel Injection (YFI) Keihin 44mm
IgnitionContactless controlled fully electronic ignition with digital ignition adjustment, type KokusanTCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Lubrication-Wet sump
StarterElectric & kickElectric / Kick
Valve System-5
Drivetrain
ClutchMultidisc clutch in oil bath/hydraulically activatedWet, multiple discs
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed5-speed
Primary Drive5/8 x 1/4-
Transmission / Drive-6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame made of chrome molybdenum steel tubingAluminium Bilateral Beam
Suspension - FrontWP ?Suspension Up Side Down 4860 MXMA PAKYB Speed-Sensitive System
Suspension - RearWP ?Suspension PDS 5018 DCCKYB Fully adjustable single shock
Rake26.5°27.0°
Seat-2 people seat
Trail-115 mm / 4.5 in.
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in.310 mm / 12.2 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear335 mm / 13.2 in.315 mm / 12.4 in.
Electrical Systems
InstrumentationDigital cockpitDigital
Lighting system-LED lights
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)10.2 inches9.8 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)260 mm250 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)8.7 inches9.6 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)220 mm245 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearingsSingle disc. Hydraulic.
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Brake calipers on floating bearingsSingle disc. Hydraulic.
Rims-Black Excel rims
Tyres - Front110/70-1780/100-21
Tyres - Rear130/70-17100/100-18

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2014 KTM 200 XC-W and the 2015 Yamaha WR 250F are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2014 KTM 200 XC-W - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 355 mm vs 325 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 315 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2015 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.

2014 KTM 200 XC-W vs 2015 Yamaha WR 250F - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W and 2015 Yamaha WR 250F?
The 2014 KTM 200 XC-W uses Single cylinder, two-stroke, while the 2015 Yamaha WR 250F is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W is a two-stroke engine while the 2015 Yamaha WR 250F runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which should I buy, the 2014 KTM 200 XC-W or the 2015 Yamaha WR 250F?
Both are strong choices. The 2014 KTM 200 XC-W has the edge in greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2015 Yamaha WR 250F stands out for liquid cooling and fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.