2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R vs 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | - | 2003 |
| Colours | Red, green, silver | - |
| Make Model | - | Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | - | 805 mm / 31.7 in to 825 mm / 32.5 in |
| Wheelbase | - | 1545 mm / 60.8 in |
| Ground Clearance | - | 130 mm / 5.1 in |
| Height | - | 1450mm / 57.1 in |
| Length | - | 2230 mm / 87.8 in |
| Width | - | 750 mm / 29.5 in |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 215 kg / 474.0 lbs | 264 kg / 582 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | - | 25 Liters / 6.6 US gal |
| Wet Weight | - | 291 kg / 641.5 lbs |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | 320.0 km/h / 198.8 mph | 249 km/h / 154.7 mph |
| Max Power | - | 145 hp / 105.7 kW @ 8500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 134.00 | 125 Nm / 13.7kgf-m / 99.1 ft-lb @ 6000 rpm |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | 0.8605 HP/kg | - |
| Standing Start ¼ Mile | - | 11.0 sec |
| Engine |
| Stroke | 4 | - |
| Engine Type | In-line four | - |
| Displacement (ci) | 73.16 cubic inches | - |
| Displacement (cc) | 1199.00 cc | - |
| Displacement | - | 1298 cc / 79.2 cu-in cc / 79.2 cu-in |
| Engine Detail | - | Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder. |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 79 x 66.2 mm |
| Compression Ratio | - | 10.8:1 |
| Cooling System | - | Liquid cooled, |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 18.5 km/lit |
| Fuel Induction | - | Mikuni 42mm throttle body F.I. |
| Ignition | - | CDI |
| Lubrication | - | Wet sump |
| Spark Plug | - | NGK, CR8E |
| Starter | Electric | Electric |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Wet, multiple discs, hydraulic operated |
| Final Drive | Chain | Shaft |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | - |
| Transmission / Drive | - | 5 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Aluminium, twin spar |
| Suspension - Front | - | 48mm Soqi telescopic fork w/adjustable preload, compression and rebound damping |
| Suspension - Rear | - | Single shock, link-type, w/adjustable preload and rebound damping |
| Rake | - | 26° |
| Trail | - | 109 mm / 4.3 in |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 137 mm / 5.3 in |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 122 mm / 5.1 in |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | Dual disc | 2x 320mm discs 4 piston calipers |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single 283mm disc 2 piston caliper |
| Tyres - Front | - | 120/70 ZR17 |
| Tyres - Rear | - | 180/55 ZR17 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R
The 2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R edges out the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS thanks to its lighter kerb weight. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R - Advantages
- ⚖️Lighter: 215 kg vs 291 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS - Advantages
- 🌡️Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R vs 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R and 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS?
The 2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R uses In-line four, while the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS is powered by Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder..
Which is lighter, the 2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R or the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS?
The 2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R is lighter at 215 kg compared to 291 kg for the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS - a difference of 76 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which should I buy, the 2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R or the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS?
Both are strong choices. The 2000 Kawasaki ZX-12R has the edge in lighter kerb weight, while the 2003 Yamaha FJR 1300 / ABS stands out for liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.