MotoSpecs

1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 vs 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, transverse six cylinder, DOHC, 2 valve per cylinder.
Power
87.5 kW / 120 hp @ 8000 rpm
Top Speed
223.6 km/h / 139 mph
Weight
322 kg / 709 lbs
2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four
Power
146.8 hp / 108 kW @ 11000 rpm
Top Speed
246.1 km/h
Weight
221 kg / 487 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year1981 - 822006
Make ModelKawasaki Z 1300Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)-5.3 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)-135 mm
Seat Height-815 mm / 32.1 in
Wheelbase1580 mm / 62.2 in1461 mm / 57.5 in
Ground Clearance145 mm / 5.7 in135 mm / 5.3 in
Height-1204 mm / 47.4 in
Length-2141 mm / 84.3 in
Width-770 mm / 30.3 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight297 kg / 654.8 lbs198 kg / 436.5 lbs
Fuel Capacity27 Litres / US 7.1 gal18 Litres / 4.76 gal
Oil Capacity4.5 L / 1.2 US gal-
Wet Weight322 kg / 709 lbs221 kg / 487 lbs
Performance
Top Speed223.6 km/h / 139 mph 246.1 km/h
Acceleration (0-161 km/h)9.02 sec-
Acceleration (0-60 mph)4.01 sec-
Braking (48 km/h - 0)10.4 m / 34 ft-
Braking (97 km/h - 0)44.5 m / 146 ft-
Max Power87.5 kW / 120 hp @ 8000 rpm146.8 hp / 108 kW @ 11000 rpm
Max Torque116 Nm / 11.8 kgf-m / 85.6 ft. lbs @ 6500 rpm106 Nm /10.5 kgf-m / 76.7 ft-lb @ 8000 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio-0.7250 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile11.9 sec / 185 km/h / 115 mph11.1 sec
Engine
Fuel Control-DOHC
Engine Type-In-line four
Stroke-4
Displacement1286 cc / 78.5 cu in998 cc / 60.9 ci-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse six cylinder, DOHC, 2 valve per cylinder.Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 5 valve per cylinder
Fuel System-Injection
Bore x Stroke62 x 71 mm77 X 53.6 mm
Compression Ratio9.9:111.5:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
Engine Lubrication-Wet sump
Engine Oil SpecificationMineral, 10W/40Synthetic, 20W/40
Fuel Consumption6.5 L/100 km / 15.3 km/l / 36 US mpg13.4 km/lit
Fuel Induction3x 32mm twin choke Mikuni BSW carburetorsFuel injection
IgnitionAnalogue CDI (Capacitive Discharge Ign.)Digital TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition with 32-bit ECU
LubricationWet sumpWet sump
Spark PlugNGK, CR9ENGK, CR9EK
StarterElectricElectric
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multi discWet, multiple discs, hydraulic operated
Final DriveShaftO-ring chain
Gear Ratios1st 2.29 (39/17) / 2nd 1.67 (35/21) / 3rd 1.28 (32/25) / 4th 1.07 (29/27) 5th 0.93 (27/29):1-
Gearbox-5-speed
Transmission / Drive5 Speed6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeDouble CradleAluminium die-cast, diamond shaped
Suspension - FrontTelescopic forksTelescopic upside forks,
Suspension - RearDual shocks preload adjustableLink-type swingarm,
Rake28.5°25.0°
Trail102 mm / 4.0 in.109 mm / 4.3 in
Wheel Travel - Front200 mm / 7.9 in.130 mm / 5.1 in
Wheel Travel - Rear-130 mm / 5.1 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)-320 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)-12.6 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)-245 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)-9.6 inches
Brakes - Front2x 260 mm discs, 2 piston calipers2x 320mm discs 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 250 mm disc, 1 piston caliperSingle 245mm disc 1 piston caliper
Tyres - Front110/90 -18120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear130/90 -17190/50 ZR17

Verdict

Winner on specs

1982 Kawasaki Z 1300

The 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 edges out the 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer thanks to its higher torque, larger fuel tank, greater ground clearance, higher front wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 116 Nm vs 106 Nm /10.5 kgf-m - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
  • Larger displacement: 1286 cc vs 998 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
  • More ground clearance: 145 mm vs 135 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
  • More front wheel travel: 200 mm vs 130 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer - Advantages

  • Lighter: 221 kg vs 322 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.

1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 vs 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 and 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer?
The 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 uses Four stroke, transverse six cylinder, DOHC, 2 valve per cylinder., while the 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer is powered by In-line four.
Which is lighter, the 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 or the 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer?
The 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer is lighter at 221 kg compared to 322 kg for the 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 - a difference of 101 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which has the larger fuel tank, the 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 or the 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer?
The 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 has the larger tank at approximately 27 litres vs 18 litres for the 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 450-540 km vs 300-360 km between stops.
Which should I buy, the 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 or the 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer?
Both are strong choices. The 1982 Kawasaki Z 1300 has the edge in higher torque and larger fuel tank, while the 2006 Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer stands out for lighter kerb weight and fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Kawasaki Z 1300 years All Yamaha FZ-1 Fazer years
Build your own comparison →