2020 Husqvarna FC250 vs 2023 KTM 300 SX
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | White/yellow/blue | Orange/white/grey |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 14.6 inches | 13.9 inches |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 370 mm | 354 mm |
| Seat Height | 950 mm / 37.4 in. | 958 mm / 37.7 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1482 mm / 58.3 in. | 1482 mm / 58.3 in. |
| Length | 2260 mm / 89.0 in. | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 99.5 kg / 219.4 lbs | 99.4 kg / 219.1 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 7.00 litres / 1.85 US gallons | 7.20 litres / 1.90 US gallons |
| Performance |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | 0.4623 HP/kg | - |
| Engine |
| Fuel Control | Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC) | - |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, four-stroke | Single cylinder, two-stroke |
| Displacement (ci) | 15.25 cubic inches | 17.89 cubic inches |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.1 x 2.1 inches | 2.8 x 2.8 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 78.0 x 52.3 mm | 72.0 x 72.0 mm |
| Stroke | - | 2-stroke |
| Displacement (cc) | 249.9 cc | 293.2 cc |
| CO2 | - | 64.7 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission) |
| Fuel System | Carburettor | Injection |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 2.79 litres/100 km (35.8 km/l or 84.31 mpg) |
| Ignition | Keihin EMS | Vitesco Technologies EMS |
| Starter | Electric | Electric |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet, multi-disc clutch, Magura hydraulics | Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics |
| Final Drive | Chain (final drive) | Chain (final drive) |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Primary Drive | - | X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4´ chain |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | 25CrMo4 steel central-tube | Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel |
| Suspension - Front | WP-USD, AER 48, Ø 48 mm | WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm |
| Suspension - Rear | WP Monoshock with linkage | WP XACT Monoshock with linkage |
| Rake | 26.1° | 26.5° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 310 mm / 12.2 in. | 300 mm / 11.8 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 300 mm / 11.8 in. | 310 mm / 12.2 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc. Brembo twin-piston floating calliper | Single disc. Brembo 2-piston floating caliper |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc. Brembo single-piston floating calliper | Single disc. Brembo single-piston floating calliper, brake disc |
| Tyres - Front | 90/90-21 | 1.60-21 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2023 KTM 300 SX
The 2023 KTM 300 SX edges out the 2020 Husqvarna FC250 thanks to its fuel injection. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2020 Husqvarna FC250 - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 2020 Husqvarna FC250 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2023 KTM 300 SX - Advantages
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
2020 Husqvarna FC250 vs 2023 KTM 300 SX - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2020 Husqvarna FC250 and 2023 KTM 300 SX?
The 2020 Husqvarna FC250 uses Single cylinder, four-stroke, while the 2023 KTM 300 SX is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2020 Husqvarna FC250 is a four-stroke engine while the 2023 KTM 300 SX runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which should I buy, the 2020 Husqvarna FC250 or the 2023 KTM 300 SX?
Both are strong choices. The 2020 Husqvarna FC250 has its own strengths, while the 2023 KTM 300 SX stands out for fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.