2009 Honda CRF 250X vs 2008 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2008 Yamaha WR 250F
Full specifications comparison •
3 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | - | 2007 - 08 |
| Colours | Red | - |
| Make Model | - | Yamaha WR 250F |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 13.4 inches | 14.4 inches |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 340 mm | 366 mm |
| Seat Height | 958 mm / 37.7 in. | 980 mm / 38.6 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. |
| Ground Clearance | - | 335 mm / 13.2 in |
| Height | - | 1,298 mm / 51.1 in. |
| Length | - | 2,164 mm / 85.2 in. |
| Width | - | 826 mm / 32.5 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | - | 106.1 kg / 234.0 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 7.19 litres / 1.90 gallons | 7.94 litres / 2.10 gallons |
| Wet Weight | 114.8 kg / 253.0 lbs | 129.0 kg / 284.4 lbs |
| Engine |
| Fuel Control | SOHC | DOHC |
| Displacement (ci) | 15.19 cubic inches | 15.26 cubic inches |
| Displacement (cc) | 249.00 cc | 250.00 cc |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 78.0 x 52.2 mm | 77.0 x 53.6 mm |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.1 x 2.1 inches | 3.0 x 2.1 inches |
| Stroke | 4 | 4 |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder | Single cylinder |
| Displacement | - | 249 cc / 15.2 cu-in |
| Engine Detail | - | Four stroke, single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valve |
| Fuel System | Carburettor. 37mm Keihin flat-slide | Carburettor |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 77 x 53.6 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 12.9:1 | 12.5:1 |
| Cooling System | - | Liquid cooled, |
| Fuel Induction | - | Keihin FCR-MX37 flat-slide w/throttle position sensor) |
| Ignition | CD | Digital CDI |
| Lubrication | - | Dry sump |
| Starter | - | Electric / Kick |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Wet, multiple discs, cable operated |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Transmission / Drive | - | 5 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Aluminium Bilateral Beam |
| Suspension - Front | 47.0mm inverted Showa cartridge fork with 16-position rebound and 16-position compression damping adjustability | Inverted fork |
| Suspension - Rear | Pro-Link Showa single-shock with spring preload, 13-position [low-speed] and 3.5-turn [high-speed] compression damping and 17-position rebound damping adjustability | Single shock |
| Rake | 27.5° | 27.0° |
| Trail | 118 mm / 4.6 in. | 115 mm / 4.5 in |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 315 mm / 12.4 in. | 300 mm / 11.8 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 315 mm / 12.4 in. | 310 mm / 12.2 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 9.6 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 9.8 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 250 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 245 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Double disc | Single disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | 80/21-21 | 80/80-M21 |
| Tyres - Rear | 100/18-18 | 100/80-M18 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2009 Honda CRF 250X
The 2009 Honda CRF 250X edges out the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F thanks to its lower seat height and dual front discs. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2009 Honda CRF 250X - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 958 mm vs 980 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
- 💿Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
2008 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages
- 🌡️Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
2009 Honda CRF 250X vs 2008 Yamaha WR 250F - FAQs
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2009 Honda CRF 250X or the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F?
The 2009 Honda CRF 250X has the lower seat at 958 mm, making it more accessible. The 2008 Yamaha WR 250F sits higher at 980 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2009 Honda CRF 250X or the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F?
Both are strong choices. The 2009 Honda CRF 250X has the edge in lower seat height and dual front discs, while the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F stands out for liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.