2007 Honda CRF 250X vs 2008 Yamaha WR 250F vs 2008 Yamaha WR 250F
Full specifications comparison •
3 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | - | 2007 - 08 |
| Colours | Red | - |
| Make Model | - | Yamaha WR 250F |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 13.6 inches | 14.4 inches |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 345 mm | 366 mm |
| Seat Height | 958 mm / 37.7 in. | 980 mm / 38.6 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. | 1,481 mm / 58.3 in. |
| Ground Clearance | - | 335 mm / 13.2 in |
| Height | - | 1,298 mm / 51.1 in. |
| Length | - | 2,164 mm / 85.2 in. |
| Width | - | 826 mm / 32.5 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | 102.1 kg / 225.0 lbs | 106.1 kg / 234.0 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 8.32 litres / 2.20 gallons | 7.94 litres / 2.10 gallons |
| Wet Weight | - | 129.0 kg / 284.4 lbs |
| Engine |
| Displacement (cc) | 249.00 cc | 250.00 cc |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.1 x 2.1 inches | 3.0 x 2.1 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 78.0 x 52.2 mm | 77.0 x 53.6 mm |
| Displacement (ci) | 15.19 cubic inches | 15.26 cubic inches |
| Fuel Control | SOHC | DOHC |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder | Single cylinder |
| Stroke | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | - | 249 cc / 15.2 cu-in |
| Engine Detail | - | Four stroke, single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valve |
| Fuel System | Carburettor. Keihin 37.0mm flat-slide with throttle position sensor (TPS) | Carburettor |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 77 x 53.6 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 12.5:1 |
| Cooling System | - | Liquid cooled, |
| Fuel Induction | - | Keihin FCR-MX37 flat-slide w/throttle position sensor) |
| Ignition | CD with electronic advance and lighting coil | Digital CDI |
| Lubrication | - | Dry sump |
| Starter | Electric & kick | Electric / Kick |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Wet, multiple discs, cable operated |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Transmission / Drive | - | 5 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Aluminium Bilateral Beam |
| Suspension - Front | 47.0mm inverted Showa cartridge fork with 16-position rebound and 16-position compression damping adjustability | Inverted fork |
| Suspension - Rear | Pro-Link Showa single shock with spring-preload, 17-position rebound-damping adjustability, and compression-damping adjustment separated into low-speed (13 positions) and high-speed (3.5 turns) | Single shock |
| Rake | 27.9° | 27.0° |
| Trail | 118 mm / 4.6 in. | 115 mm / 4.5 in |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 315 mm / 12.4 in. | 300 mm / 11.8 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 315 mm / 12.4 in. | 310 mm / 12.2 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 9.4 inches | 9.8 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 240 mm | 250 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | 9.4 inches | 9.6 inches |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | 240 mm | 245 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc | Single disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | 80/100-21 | 80/80-M21 |
| Tyres - Rear | 100/90-18 | 100/80-M18 |
Verdict
⚖️
Too close to call
The 2007 Honda CRF 250X and the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.
Key Differences
2007 Honda CRF 250X - Advantages
- 📏Lower seat height: 958 mm vs 980 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2008 Yamaha WR 250F - Advantages
- 🌡️Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
2007 Honda CRF 250X vs 2008 Yamaha WR 250F - FAQs
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2007 Honda CRF 250X or the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F?
The 2007 Honda CRF 250X has the lower seat at 958 mm, making it more accessible. The 2008 Yamaha WR 250F sits higher at 980 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2007 Honda CRF 250X or the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F?
Both are strong choices. The 2007 Honda CRF 250X has the edge in lower seat height, while the 2008 Yamaha WR 250F stands out for liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.