1992 Honda CBR 1000F vs 1994 Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | - | 1993 - 94 |
| Make Model | - | Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | - | 790 mm / 31.1 in |
| Wheelbase | - | 1495 mm / 58.9 in |
| Height | - | 1320 mm / 51.9 in |
| Length | - | 2170 mm / 85.4 in |
| Width | - | 700 mm / 27.5 in |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | - | 246.0 kg / 542.3 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.00 litres / 5.55 gallons | 20 Litres / 5.28 gal |
| Wet Weight | 254.0 kg / 560.0 lbs | 278.2 kg / 613.3 lbs |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | 235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph | 227.8 km/h / 141.5 mph |
| Braking (60 km/h - 0) | - | 13.9 m / 39.6 m |
| Max Power | - | 102 hp / 74.4 kW @ 9000 rpm |
| Max Torque | - | 106 Nm / 78.1 lb-ft @ 6500 rpm |
| Standing Start ¼ Mile | - | 11.8 sec / 185.6 km/h |
| Engine |
| Stroke | 4 | - |
| Fuel Control | DOHC | - |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.0 x 2.1 inches | - |
| Engine Type | In-line four | - |
| Displacement (ci) | 60.90 cubic inches | - |
| Displacement (cc) | 998.00 cc | - |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 77.0 x 53.6 mm | - |
| Displacement | - | 1002 cc / 61.2 cu-in |
| Engine Detail | - | Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 5 valves per cylinder. |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 75.5 X 56 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Cooling System | - | Liquid cooled |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 15.5 km/lit |
| Fuel Induction | - | Electronic fuel infection. |
| Ignition | - | Digital |
| Lubrication | - | Wet sump |
| Starter | - | Electric |
| Valve System | 4 | - |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Wet, multiple discs, cable operated |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gear Ratios | - | 1 st 36/14 (2.571) 2 nd 32/1 8 (1.778) 3rd 29/21 (1.381) 4th 27/23 (1.174) 5th 28/27 (1.037) |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | - |
| Primary Drive Ratios | - | 68/41 (1.659) |
| Secondary Drive Ratio | - | 47/17 (2.765) |
| Transmission / Drive | - | 5 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Suspension - Front | - | Single sided swingarm variable preload, compression and rebound damping |
| Suspension - Rear | - | Monocross variable preload, compression and rebound damping |
| Rake | - | 24° |
| Trail | - | 100 mm / 3.9 in |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 116 mm / 4.5 in |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 130 mm / 5.1 in |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | Dual disc | Single 330mm disc 6 piston caliper with ABS |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single 282mm disc 2 piston caliper |
| Tyres - Front | 20/70-17 | 130/60 ZR17 |
| Tyres - Rear | 170/60-17 | 170/60 ZR17 |
| Wheels - Front | - | MT3.50 x 17, Aluminum |
| Wheels - Rear | - | MT5.50 x 17,Aluminum |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
1994 Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS
The 1994 Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS edges out the 1992 Honda CBR 1000F thanks to its liquid cooling. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
1992 Honda CBR 1000F - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 1992 Honda CBR 1000F matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
1994 Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS - Advantages
- 🌡️Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
1992 Honda CBR 1000F vs 1994 Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1992 Honda CBR 1000F and 1994 Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS?
The 1992 Honda CBR 1000F uses In-line four, while the 1994 Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS is powered by Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 5 valves per cylinder..
Which should I buy, the 1992 Honda CBR 1000F or the 1994 Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS?
Both are strong choices. The 1992 Honda CBR 1000F has its own strengths, while the 1994 Yamaha GTS1000 / ABS stands out for liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.