MotoSpecs

2012 Ducati Monster 796 vs 2013 Triumph Bonneville

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2012 Ducati Monster 796 2012 Ducati Monster 796

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, 90° °L° twin cylinder, SOHC, desmodromic 2 valves per cylinder
Power
64 kW / 87 hp @ 8250 rpm
Top Speed
200.4 km/h / 124.5 mph
Weight
187 kg / 412 lbs
2013 Triumph Bonneville 2013 Triumph Bonneville

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
49 kW / 66 hp @ 7250 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
225 kg / 495 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year20122013
Make ModelDucati Monster 796Triumph Bonneville
Dimensions
Seat Height800 mm / 31.5 in739 mm / 29.1 in
Wheelbase1450 mm / 57.1in1488 mm / 58.6 in
Height-1130 mm / 44.5 in
Length-2113 mm / 83.2 in
Width-840 mm / 33.1 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight167 kg - 369 lbs / 169 kg -373 lbs ABS version205 kg / 451 lbs
Fuel Capacity15 L / 4.0 USgal / 3.3 Imp gal (13.5 L / 3.6 US gal / 3.0 Imp gal ABS version)16.0 Litres / 4.2 US gal / 3.5 Imp gal
Wet Weight187 kg / 412 lbs225 kg / 495 lbs
Performance
Top Speed200.4 km/h / 124.5 mph-
Max Power64 kW / 87 hp @ 8250 rpm49 kW / 66 hp @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque78.5 Nm / 8.0 kgf-m 58 lb-ft @ 6250rpm71 Nm / 7.24 kgf-m / 52 ft-lb @ 6000 rpm
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.1 sec-
Engine
Displacement803 cc / 49.0 cu in865 cc / 52.8 cu in
Engine DetailFour stroke, 90° °L° twin cylinder, SOHC, desmodromic 2 valves per cylinderFour stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Bore x Stroke88 x 66 mm90 x 68 mm
Compression Ratio11.0:19.2:1
Cooling SystemAir cooledAir-cooled
Engine Oil Specification-Synthetic, 15W/50
ExhaustLightweight 2-1-2 system with catalytic converter with twin lambda probes-
Fuel Consumption5.2 L/100 km / 19.1 km/l . 45 US mpg / 54 Imp mpg-
Fuel InductionSiemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle bodyMultipoint Sequential Fuel injection
IgnitionMarelli electronicDigital
Lubrication-Wet sump
StarterElectric-
Drivetrain
ClutchAPTC wet multiplate with hydraulic controlWet, multi plate
Final DriveChain; front sprocket 15; rear sprocket 39Chain, X-ring
Gear Ratios1st 32/13, 2nd 30/18, 3rd 28/21, 4th 26/23, 5th 22/22, 6th 24/26-
Primary DriveStraight cut gears; ratio 1.85:1-
Transmission / Drive6 Speed 5 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel trellisTubular steel cradle, swing arm: twin-sided, tubular steel
Suspension - FrontShowa 43mm upside-down forks41mm Kayaba telescopic forks
Suspension - RearProgressive linkage with fully adjustable Sachs monoshock with piggy back aluminum swing armKayaba chrome spring twin shocks with adjustable preload
Rake24°26°
Trail87mm / 3.42 in106 mm / 4.2 in
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear148 mm / 5.8 in106 mm / 4.17 in
Electrical Systems
InstrumentationDigital unit displaying: Speedometer, rev counter, clock, scheduled maintenance warning, oil temperature, trip fuel, lap time, warning light for low oil pressure, fuel level, fuel reserve, neutral, turn signals, overrev, immobilizer. Ready for DDA system.-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front2 x 320mm Discs, 4 piston calipersSingle 310 mm disc, 2 piston Nissen floating calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 245 mm disc, 2 piston caliper-
Tyres - Front120/70 -ZR17100/70 R17
Tyres - Rear160/55 -ZR17130/80 R17
Wheels - Front-Cast aluminium alloy, 7 spokes, 17 x 3.0 in
Wheels - Rear-Cast aluminium alloy, 7spokes, 17 x 3.5 in

Verdict

Winner on specs

2012 Ducati Monster 796

The 2012 Ducati Monster 796 edges out the 2013 Triumph Bonneville thanks to its more peak power, lighter kerb weight, dual front discs and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2012 Ducati Monster 796 - Advantages

  • More power: Produces 64 kW vs 49 kW - a meaningful performance advantage.
  • Lighter: 187 kg vs 225 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More rear wheel travel: 148 mm vs 106 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2013 Triumph Bonneville - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 739 mm vs 800 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Larger displacement: 865 cc vs 803 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.

2012 Ducati Monster 796 vs 2013 Triumph Bonneville - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2012 Ducati Monster 796 and 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
The 2012 Ducati Monster 796 uses Four stroke, 90° °L° twin cylinder, SOHC, desmodromic 2 valves per cylinder, while the 2013 Triumph Bonneville is powered by Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Which is lighter, the 2012 Ducati Monster 796 or the 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
The 2012 Ducati Monster 796 is lighter at 187 kg compared to 225 kg for the 2013 Triumph Bonneville - a difference of 38 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which has more power, the 2012 Ducati Monster 796 or the 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
The 2012 Ducati Monster 796 produces more peak power at 64 kW, compared to 49 kW for the 2013 Triumph Bonneville.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 Ducati Monster 796 or the 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
The 2013 Triumph Bonneville has the lower seat at 739 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 Ducati Monster 796 sits higher at 800 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 Ducati Monster 796 or the 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 Ducati Monster 796 has the edge in more peak power and lighter kerb weight, while the 2013 Triumph Bonneville stands out for lower seat height and larger displacement. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Ducati Monster 796 years All Triumph Bonneville years
Build your own comparison →