2009 Ducati Monster 696 vs 2008 Yamaha FZ6

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2009 Ducati Monster 696 2009 Ducati Monster 696

Naked bike

Engine
V2, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
354.9 pounds
2008 Yamaha FZ6 2008 Yamaha FZ6

Naked bike

Engine
In-line four
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
410.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
ColoursRed (red/black), Matte Black (black/black), White (black/black)Raven, cobalt blue
Dimensions
Seat Height770 mm / 30.3 in.795 mm / 31.3 in.
Wheelbase1,450 mm / 57.1 in.1,440 mm / 56.7 in.
Height-1,209 mm / 47.6 in.
Length-2,096 mm / 82.5 in.
Width-749 mm / 29.5 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight161 kg / 354.9 lbs186 kg / 410.0 lbs
Fuel Capacity15.00 litres / 3.96 gallons19.30 litres / 5.10 gallons
Performance
Max Torque50.60 Nm (5.2 kgf-m or 37.3 ft.lbs)-
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.4898 HP/kg-
Engine
Stroke-4
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.5 x 2.3 inches2.6 x 1.8 inches
Displacement (cc)696.00 cc600.00 cc
Displacement (ci)42.47 cubic inches36.61 cubic inches
Engine TypeV2, four-strokeIn-line four
Fuel ControlDesmodromic valve controlDOHC
Bore x Stroke (mm)88.0 x 57.2 mm65.5 x 44.5 mm
Fuel SystemInjection. Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle bodyInjection. Group Fuel Injection, 36mm throttle bodies
Compression Ratio10.7:112.2:1
Exhaust2 aluminium mufflers-
Ignition-TCI
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System24
Drivetrain
ClutchAPTC wet multiplate with hydraulic control-
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTubular steel trellis frame-
Suspension - FrontShowa 43mm upside-down forks43mm telescopic fork, 5.1-in travel
Suspension - RearProgressive linkage with preload and rebound Sachs adjustable monoshockSingle shock
Rake24.0°25.0°
Trail-97 mm / 3.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in.-
Wheel Travel - Rear148 mm / 5.8 in.130 mm / 5.1 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches11.7 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm298 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.6 inches9.6 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)245 mm245 mm
Brakes - FrontDouble discDouble disc
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle disc
Tyres - Front120/60-ZR17120/70-ZR17
Tyres - Rear160/60-ZR17180/55-ZR17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2009 Ducati Monster 696

The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 edges out the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 thanks to its lighter kerb weight, lower seat height and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2009 Ducati Monster 696 - Advantages

  • Lighter: 161 kg vs 186 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Lower seat height: 770 mm vs 795 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • More rear wheel travel: 148 mm vs 130 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2008 Yamaha FZ6 - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2008 Yamaha FZ6 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2009 Ducati Monster 696 vs 2008 Yamaha FZ6 - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 and 2008 Yamaha FZ6?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 uses V2, four-stroke, while the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 is powered by In-line four.
Which is lighter, the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 or the 2008 Yamaha FZ6?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 is lighter at 161 kg compared to 186 kg for the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 - a difference of 25 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 or the 2008 Yamaha FZ6?
The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 has the lower seat at 770 mm, making it more accessible. The 2008 Yamaha FZ6 sits higher at 795 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2009 Ducati Monster 696 or the 2008 Yamaha FZ6?
Both are strong choices. The 2009 Ducati Monster 696 has the edge in lighter kerb weight and lower seat height, while the 2008 Yamaha FZ6 offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.