2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO vs 2014 Honda CB 1000R

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles

Differences only

2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO

Naked bike

Engine

Four stroke, 90° °L° twin cylinder, SOHC, desmodromic 2 valves per cylinder

Power

N/A

Top Speed

225 km/h / 139.8 mph

Weight

188 kg / 414 lbs (with ABS)

2014 Honda CB 1000R

Naked bike

Engine

In-line four, four-stroke

Power

123.4 hp / 92 kW @ 10000 rpm

Top Speed

228.6 km/h / 142.0 mph

Weight

485.0 pounds

Full Specifications

Differs Same

General
Comments	-	Model ID: CB1000R
Year	2013	2014
Colours	-	Matte Gray Metallic
Make Model	Ducati Monster 1100 EVO	Honda CB 1000R
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)	-	5.5 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)	-	140 mm
Seat Height	810 mm / 31.9 in	828 mm / 32.6 in
Wheelbase	1450 mm / 57.1in	1445 mm / 56.8 in
Ground Clearance	-	130 mm / 5.1 in
Height	1099 mm / 43.3 in	1,155 mm / 45.5 in.
Length	2095 mm / 82.5 in	1,715 mm / 67.5 in.
Width	784 mm / 30.9 in	770 mm / 30.3 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight	-	83 kg / 183.0 lbs
Fuel Capacity	13 L / 3.4 US gal / 2.9 Imp gal	17 Litres / 4.5 US gal
Wet Weight	188 kg / 414 lbs (with ABS)	220 kg / 485 lbs
Performance
Top Speed	225 km/h / 139.8 mph	228.6 km/h / 142.0 mph
Acceleration (0-100 km/h)	3.6 sec	-
Acceleration (100-140 km/h)	4.9 sec	-
Acceleration (140-180 km/h)	5.7 sec	-
Acceleration (60-100 km/h)	5.0 sec	-
Acceleration (60-140 km/h)	10.9 s ec	-
Max Power	-	123.4 hp / 92 kW @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque	103 Nm / 10.5 / 76 ft-lb kgm @ 6000rpm	100 Nm / 73.8 lb-ft @ 8000 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio	-	0.0843 HP/kg
Standing Start 0-140 km/h	5.8 sec	-
Standing Start 0-200 km/h	14.6 sec	-
Standing Start ¼ Mile	-	11.3 sec
Engine
Fuel Control	-	DOHC
CO2	-	147.6 CO
Engine Type	-	In-line four, four-stroke
Displacement	1078 cc / 65.8 cu in	998 cc / 60.9 cu-in
Engine Detail	Four stroke, 90° °L° twin cylinder, SOHC, desmodromic 2 valves per cylinder	Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valve per cylinder.
Fuel System	-	Injection. PGM-FI Fuel injection with automatic enrichment circuit and 36mm throttle bodies
Bore x Stroke	98 x 71.5 mm	75 x 56.5 mm
Compression Ratio	11.3:1	11.2:1
Cooling System	Air cooled	Liquid cooled
Emissions	-	Meets current EPA standards. Models sold in California meet current CARB standards and may differ slightly due to emissions equipment.
Exhaust	Lightweight 2-1-2 system with catalytic converter and two lambda probes. Twin aluminum mufflers	-
Fuel Consumption	4.8 L/100 km 20.8 km/l / 49 US mpg / 59 Imp mpg	18.3 km/lit
Fuel Induction	Siemens electronic fuel injection, 45mm throttle bodies	PGM-F1 Electronic fuel injection36mm throttle bodies
Ignition	Marelli electronic	Computer controlled digital transistorized
Lubrication	Wet sump	Wet sump
Starter	Electric	Electric
Valve System	-	4
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity	-	12V/8.6AH
Drivetrain
Clutch	Wet multiplate with hydraulic control	Wet, multiplate with coil springs.
Final Drive	Chain; front sprocket 15; rear sprocket 39	#530 O-ring sealed chain
Gear Ratios	1st 37/15, 2nd 30/17, 3rd 27/20, 4th 24/22, 5th 23/24, 6th 24/28	1: 2.538 (33/13) / - 2: 1.941 (33/17) / - 3: 1.579 (30/19) / - 4: 1.363 (30/22) / - 5: 1.217 (28/23) / - 6: 1.115 (29/26)
Gearbox	-	6-speed
Primary Drive	Straight cut gears; ratio 1.84:1	#530 0-ring-sealed chain
Transmission / Drive	6 Speed	6 Speed
Chassis
Frame Type	Tubular steel Trellis frame	Mono-back born coast aluminous
Suspension - Front	Marzocchi 43mm fully adjustable usd forks	43mm Inverted HMAS cartridge type telescopic forks, with stepless reload, compression and rebound adjustable
Suspension - Rear	Progressive with preload and rebound Sachs adjustable monoshock	Monoshock with gas charged HMAS damper rebound adjustable
Rake	24°	25.0°
Trail	86 mm / 3.4 in	99.0mm / 3.9 in
Wheel Travel - Front	130 mm / 5.1 in	120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear	148 mm / 5.8 in	128 mm / 5.0 in
Electrical Systems
Instrumentation	Digital unit displaying: Speedometer, rev counter, time, scheduled maintenance warning, oil temperature, trip fuel, lap time, warning light for low oil pressure, fuel level, fuel reserve, neutral, turn signals, warning ABS, overrev, DTC, immobilizer. Ready for DDA system.	-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)	-	310 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)	-	12.2 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)	-	10.1 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)	-	256 mm
Brakes - Front	2 x 320 mm Discs, 4 piston radial caliper with ABS	2x 310mm discs 3 piston calipers
Brakes - Rear	Single 245 mm disc, 2 piston caliper with ABS	Single 256mm disc 2 piston caliper
Tyres - Front	120/70 - ZR17	120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear	180/55 - ZR17	180/50 ZR17
Wheels - Front	10-spoke in light alloy 3.50 x 17	Hollow-section 4-spoke cast aluminium
Wheels - Rear	10-spoke in light alloy 5.50 x 17	U-section 4-spoke cast aluminium

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO

The 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO edges out the 2014 Honda CB 1000R thanks to its lighter kerb weight, lower seat height, dual front discs, higher rear wheel travel, higher front wheel travel and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO - Advantages

Lighter: 188 kg vs 220 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
Lower seat height: 810 mm vs 828 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
Larger displacement: 1078 cc vs 998 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
More rear wheel travel: 148 mm vs 128 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
More front wheel travel: 130 mm vs 120 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2014 Honda CB 1000R - Advantages

Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.

2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO vs 2014 Honda CB 1000R - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO and 2014 Honda CB 1000R?

The 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO uses Four stroke, 90° °L° twin cylinder, SOHC, desmodromic 2 valves per cylinder, while the 2014 Honda CB 1000R is powered by In-line four, four-stroke.

Which is lighter, the 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO or the 2014 Honda CB 1000R?

The 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO is lighter at 188 kg compared to 220 kg for the 2014 Honda CB 1000R - a difference of 32 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO or the 2014 Honda CB 1000R?

The 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO has the lower seat at 810 mm, making it more accessible. The 2014 Honda CB 1000R sits higher at 828 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.

Which has the larger fuel tank, the 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO or the 2014 Honda CB 1000R?

The 2014 Honda CB 1000R has the larger tank at approximately 17 litres vs 13 litres for the 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 283-340 km vs 216-260 km between stops.

Which should I buy, the 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO or the 2014 Honda CB 1000R?

Both are strong choices. The 2013 Ducati Monster 1100 EVO has the edge in lighter kerb weight and lower seat height, while the 2014 Honda CB 1000R stands out for larger fuel tank and liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All Ducati Monster 1100 EVO years All Honda CB 1000R years

Build your own comparison →