1981 BMW R 65 vs 2015 Ducati Scrambler Urban Enduro
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Comments | - | Aluminium engine sump guard, high front mudguard, headlight grill, aluminium handlebar cross-strut, front stem protectors, dedicated logo |
| Colours | - | Wild green |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | - | 790 mm / 31.1 in. |
| Wheelbase | - | 1,445 mm / 56.9 in. |
| Height | - | 1,150 mm / 45.3 in. |
| Length | - | 2,100 mm / 82.7 in. |
| Width | - | 845 mm / 33.3 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | - | 176 kg / 388.0 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.00 litres / 5.81 gallons | 13.50 litres / 3.57 gallons |
| Wet Weight | 204.0 kg / 449.7 lbs | 192.0 kg / 423.3 lbs |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | 175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph | - |
| Max Torque | - | 68.00 Nm (6.9 kgf-m or 50.2 ft.lbs) @ 5750 Revolutions |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | - | 0.4261 HP/kg |
| Engine |
| Stroke | 4 | - |
| Fuel Control | OHV | Desmodromic valve control |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.2 x 2.4 inches | 3.5 x 2.6 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 82.0 x 61.5 mm | 88.0 x 66.0 mm |
| Displacement (cc) | 649.00 cc | 803.00 cc |
| Engine Type | Two cylinder boxer | V2, four-stroke |
| Displacement (ci) | 39.60 cubic inches | 49.00 cubic inches |
| Engine Detail | - | L-twin |
| Fuel System | - | Injection. EFI, 50 mm throttle body |
| Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | - |
| Emissions | - | Euro 3 |
| Exhaust | - | Single stainless steel muffler |
| Starter | - | Electric |
| Valve System | 2 | 2 |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | APTC wet multiplate with mechanical control |
| Final Drive | Shaft drive (cardan) | Chain |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Tubular steel Trellis |
| Suspension - Front | - | Upside down Kayaba 41 mm fork |
| Suspension - Rear | - | Kayaba rear shock, pre-load adjustable |
| Rake | - | 24.0° |
| Seat | - | Ribbed seat |
| Trail | - | 112 mm / 4.4 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 150 mm / 5.9 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 150 mm / 5.9 in. |
| Electrical Systems |
| Instrumentation | - | LCD instrument panel |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 245 mm |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 13.0 inches |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 9.6 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 330 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc | Single disc. ABS. Four-piston calipers. |
| Brakes - Rear | Expanding brake | Single disc. ABS. Floating disc. Single-piston caliper. |
| Rims | - | Spoked aluminium wheels |
| Tyres - Front | 3.25-18 | 110/80-ZR18 |
| Tyres - Rear | 4.00-18 | 180/55-ZR17 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2015 Ducati Scrambler Urban Enduro
The 2015 Ducati Scrambler Urban Enduro edges out the 1981 BMW R 65 thanks to its fuel injection. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
1981 BMW R 65 - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 1981 BMW R 65 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2015 Ducati Scrambler Urban Enduro - Advantages
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
1981 BMW R 65 vs 2015 Ducati Scrambler Urban Enduro - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1981 BMW R 65 and 2015 Ducati Scrambler Urban Enduro?
The 1981 BMW R 65 uses Two cylinder boxer, while the 2015 Ducati Scrambler Urban Enduro is powered by V2, four-stroke.
Which should I buy, the 1981 BMW R 65 or the 2015 Ducati Scrambler Urban Enduro?
Both are strong choices. The 1981 BMW R 65 has its own strengths, while the 2015 Ducati Scrambler Urban Enduro stands out for fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.