2012 BMW R 1200R vs 2013 Triumph Bonneville

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2012 BMW R 1200R 2012 BMW R 1200R

Naked bike

Engine
Two cylinder boxer, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
491.6 pounds
2013 Triumph Bonneville 2013 Triumph Bonneville

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
49 kW / 66 hp @ 7250 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
225 kg / 495 lbs
Full Specifications
General
CommentsBlata is from the Czech Republic.-
Year-2013
ColoursGrey, silver, red-
Make Model-Triumph Bonneville
Dimensions
Seat Height800 mm / 31.5 in.739 mm / 29.1 in
Wheelbase1,495 mm / 58.9 in.1488 mm / 58.6 in
Height1,273 mm / 50.1 in.1130 mm / 44.5 in
Length2,145 mm / 84.4 in.2113 mm / 83.2 in
Width906 mm / 35.7 in.840 mm / 33.1 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight198 kg / 436.5 lbs205 kg / 451 lbs
Fuel Capacity18.00 litres / 4.76 gallons16.0 Litres / 4.2 US gal / 3.5 Imp gal
Wet Weight223.0 kg / 491.6 lbs225 kg / 495 lbs
Performance
Max Power-49 kW / 66 hp @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque119.00 Nm (12.1 kgf-m or 87.8 ft.lbs) @ 600071 Nm / 7.24 kgf-m / 52 ft-lb @ 6000 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.5486 HP/kg-
Engine
Engine TypeTwo cylinder boxer, two-stroke-
CO295.1 CO-
Displacement (cc)1170.00 cc-
Bore x Stroke (mm)101.0 x 73.0 mm-
Bore x Stroke (in,)4.0 x 2.9 inches-
Displacement (ci)71.39 cubic inches-
Displacement-865 cc / 52.8 cu in
Engine Detail-Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel SystemInjection. Electronic intake pipe injection/BMS-K+ digital enfinemanagement with overrun fuel cut-off, twin spark ignition-
Bore x Stroke-90 x 68 mm
Compression Ratio12.0:19.2:1
Cooling System-Air-cooled
EmissionsClosed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard EU-3-
Engine LubricationDry sump-
Engine Oil Specification-Synthetic, 15W/50
Fuel Consumption4.10 litres/100 km (24.4 km/l or 57.37 mpg)-
Fuel Induction-Multipoint Sequential Fuel injection
Fuel Reserve3.00 litres / 0.79 gallons-
Ignition-Digital
Lubrication-Wet sump
StarterElectric-
Drivetrain
ClutchSingle dry plate clutch, hydraulically operatedWet, multi plate
Final DriveShaft drive (cardan)Chain, X-ring
Gearbox6-speed-
Primary DriveShaft Driveline-
Transmission / Drive-5 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeTwo section frame consisting of front and rear sections, load bearing engine-gearbox unitTubular steel cradle, swing arm: twin-sided, tubular steel
Suspension - FrontBMW Motorrad telelever41mm Kayaba telescopic forks
Suspension - RearCast aluminium single sided swing arm with BMW Motorrad ParaleverKayaba chrome spring twin shocks with adjustable preload
Rake27.1°26°
Trail119 mm / 4.7 in.106 mm / 4.2 in
Wheel Travel - Front120 mm / 4.7 in.120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear190 mm / 7.5 in.106 mm / 4.17 in
Electrical Systems
Lighting system12V 55W headlight-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.4 inches-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)265 mm-
Brakes - FrontDouble disc. Optional ABSSingle 310 mm disc, 2 piston Nissen floating calipers
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Optional ABS-
RimsCast aluminium-
Tyres - Front120/70-ZR17100/70 R17
Tyres - Rear130/70-17130/80 R17
Wheels - Front-Cast aluminium alloy, 7 spokes, 17 x 3.0 in
Wheels - Rear-Cast aluminium alloy, 7spokes, 17 x 3.5 in

Verdict

Winner on specs

2012 BMW R 1200R

The 2012 BMW R 1200R edges out the 2013 Triumph Bonneville thanks to its dual front discs and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2012 BMW R 1200R - Advantages

  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
  • More rear wheel travel: 190 mm vs 106 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2013 Triumph Bonneville - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 739 mm vs 800 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.

2012 BMW R 1200R vs 2013 Triumph Bonneville - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2012 BMW R 1200R and 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
The 2012 BMW R 1200R uses Two cylinder boxer, two-stroke, while the 2013 Triumph Bonneville is powered by Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder. This is a fundamental difference - the 2012 BMW R 1200R is a two-stroke engine while the 2013 Triumph Bonneville runs a four-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2012 BMW R 1200R or the 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
The 2013 Triumph Bonneville has the lower seat at 739 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 BMW R 1200R sits higher at 800 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2012 BMW R 1200R or the 2013 Triumph Bonneville?
Both are strong choices. The 2012 BMW R 1200R has the edge in dual front discs and higher rear wheel travel, while the 2013 Triumph Bonneville stands out for lower seat height. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.