2004 BMW R 1200CL vs 2004 BMW R 1200CL vs 2007 Honda ST1300 Pan-European

Full specifications comparison • 3 motorcycles

Comparing 3 motorcycles
2004 BMW R 1200CL 2004 BMW R 1200CL

Custom / cruiser

Engine
Two cylinder boxer, four-stroke
Power
44.5 kW / 61 hp @ 5000 rpm
Top Speed
165.0 km/h
Weight
308 kg / 679 lbs
2004 BMW R 1200CL 2004 BMW R 1200CL

Touring

Engine
Two cylinder boxer
Power
44.5 kW / 61 hp @ 5000 rpm
Top Speed
164.8 km/h / 102.4 mph
Weight
308 kg / 679 lbs
2007 Honda ST1300 Pan-European 2007 Honda ST1300 Pan-European

Touring

Engine
V4, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
650.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year2004-
ColoursSilver, Blue, BrownLight Silver Metallic
Make ModelBMW R 1200CL-
Dimensions
Seat Height745 mm / 29.3 in790 mm / 31.1 in.
Wheelbase1641 mm / 64.6 in1,491 mm / 58.7 in.
Height1435 mm / 56.1 in-
Length2415 mm / 95.0 in-
Width1075 mm / 42.3 in-
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight289 kg / 637 lbs294.8 kg / 650.0 lbs
Fuel Capacity17.5 Litres / 4.5 gal29.14 litres / 7.70 gallons
Wet Weight308 kg / 679 lbs-
Performance
Top Speed164.8 km/h / 102.4 mph-
Max Power44.5 kW / 61 hp @ 5000 rpm-
Max Torque98 Nm / 10.0 kgf-m / 72.27 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm-
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.1981 HP/kg-
Standing Start ¼ Mile14.7 sec-
Engine
Displacement (cc)-1261.00 cc
Displacement (ci)-76.95 cubic inches
Stroke4-
Fuel ControlSOHCDOHC
Engine TypeTwo cylinder boxerV4, four-stroke
Bore x Stroke (mm)-78.0 x 66.0 mm
CO2118.3 CO-
Bore x Stroke (in,)-3.1 x 2.6 inches
Displacement1170 cc / 71.4 cu in.-
Engine DetailFour stroke, two cylinder horizontally opposed Boxer, 4 valves per cylinder-
Fuel SystemInjectionInjection. Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI) with automatic enricher circuit
Bore x Stroke101 x 73mm-
Compression Ratio10.0:110.8:1
Cooling SystemAir/Oil cooled-
Fuel Consumption5.1 L/100 km / 19.8 km/l / 46.5 US mpg-
Fuel InductionBosch Motronic MA 2.4 Fuel injection-
Fuel Reserve4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons-
IgnitionDigital CDI Bosch Electronic Computer-controlled digital with three-dimensional mapping and electronic advance
LubricationWet sump-
StarterElectric-
Valve System44
EV Specifics
Battery CapacityBMW Mareg, 19.5 Amp/h low maintenance-
Drivetrain
ClutchDry, single plate, hydraulic operated-
Final DriveShaftShaft drive (cardan)
Gear Ratios1st 2.045 / 2nd 1.600 / 3rd 1.267 / 4th 1.038 / 5th 0.800:1-
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Transmission / Drive5 Speed -
Chassis
Frame TypeThree section composite frame consisting of front & rear section, load bearing engine-
Suspension - FrontMotorrad Telelever, stanchion ∅35mm, central strut 45mm HMAS cartridge fork
Suspension - RearDie cast aluminium single sided swinging arm with BMW Motorrad Monolever, WAD strut (travel related damping), spring preload adjustable to continuously variable levels by means of hydraulic handwheel.HMAS gas-charged single shock with five-position spring-preload adjustability
Rake-26.0°
Trail86 mm / 3.4 in98 mm / 3.9 in.
Wheel Travel - Front145 mm / 5.7 in117 mm / 4.6 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear110 mm / 4.3 in122 mm / 4.8 in.
Electrical Systems
Charging System14 V 50 Amp Alternator (700 W) -
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)11.2 inches12.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)285 mm316 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.0 inches12.2 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)305 mm310 mm
Brakes - Front2 x ∅305mm discs, 4 piston calipersDouble disc
Brakes - RearSingle ∅285mm disc, 2 piston caliperSingle disc
Tyres - Front100/90-18120/70-ZR18
Tyres - Rear170/80-15170/60-ZR17
Wheels - Front2.50 x 18, 5-spoke alloy-
Wheels - Rear4.00 x 15, 5-spoke alloy-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2004 BMW R 1200CL

The 2004 BMW R 1200CL edges out the 2004 BMW R 1200CL thanks to its lower seat height and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2004 BMW R 1200CL - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 745 mm vs 790 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • More front wheel travel: 145 mm vs 117 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2004 BMW R 1200CL - Advantages

  • More rear wheel travel: 122 mm vs 110 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2004 BMW R 1200CL vs 2004 BMW R 1200CL - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2004 BMW R 1200CL and 2004 BMW R 1200CL?
The 2004 BMW R 1200CL uses Two cylinder boxer, four-stroke, while the 2004 BMW R 1200CL is powered by V4, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2004 BMW R 1200CL or the 2004 BMW R 1200CL?
The 2004 BMW R 1200CL has the lower seat at 745 mm, making it more accessible. The 2004 BMW R 1200CL sits higher at 790 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2004 BMW R 1200CL or the 2004 BMW R 1200CL?
Both are strong choices. The 2004 BMW R 1200CL has the edge in lower seat height and higher front wheel travel, while the 2004 BMW R 1200CL stands out for higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.