MotoSpecs

2004 BMW R 1100S vs 2007 BMW F 800ST

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2004 BMW R 1100S 2004 BMW R 1100S

Sport touring

Engine
Two cylinder boxer
Power
71.4 kW / 98 hp @ 7500 rpm
Top Speed
227 km/h / 141 mph
Weight
236 kg / 520 lbs
2007 BMW F 800ST 2007 BMW F 800ST

Sport touring

Engine
Liquid-cooled parallel twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
62.5 kW / 85 hp @ 8000 rpm
Top Speed
220.0 km/h / 137.0 mph
Weight
412.3 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year2003 - 042007
MakeBMWBMW
ModelR 1100SF 800ST
ColoursGray, Red, Gray/Mandarin, BlueBlue Metallic, Graphitan Metallic
Make ModelBMW R 1100SBMW F 800ST
Dimensions
Seat Heigth -Alternate (mm)845 mm-
Seat Heigth -Alternate (in.)33.3 inches-
Seat Height800 mm / 31.4 in820 mm / 32.2 in (low seat: 790 mm / 31.1 in)
Wheelbase1478 mm / 58.2 in1,466 mm / 57.7 in.
Height1160 mm / 45.6 in1155 or 1225 mm / 45.5 or 48.2 in (excl. mirrors)
Length2180 mm / 85.8 in1155 or 1225 mm / 45.5 or 48.2 in (excl. mirrors)
Width880 mm / 34.6 in860 mm / 33.9 in (incl. mirrors)
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight229 kg / 505 lbs187 kg / 412 lbs
Fuel Capacity18 Litres / US 4.76 gal16 Litres / 4.2 US gal
Wet Weight236 kg / 520 lbs-
Performance
Top Speed227 km/h / 141 mph220.0 km/h / 137.0 mph
Braking (100 km/h - 0)40.0 m / 131 ft-
Braking (60 km/h - 0)13.5 m / 44.3 ft-
Max Power71.4 kW / 98 hp @ 7500 rpm62.5 kW / 85 hp @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque97 Nm / 9.9 kgf-m / 71.5 lb-ft.@ 5750 rpm80 Nm / 59 lb-ft @ 5800 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.4279 HP/kg0.4545 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile12.1 sec / 177.5 km/h / 110.3 mph12.0 sec
Engine
Displacement (cc)1085.00 cc-
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.9 x 2.8 inches-
Displacement (ci)66.21 cubic inches-
Bore x Stroke (mm)99.0 x 70.5 mm-
Stroke70.5 mm75.6 mm
Engine TypeTwo cylinder boxerLiquid-cooled parallel twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel ControlOHC-
Displacement1085 cc / 66.2 cu in798 cc / 47.7 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, two cylinder horizontally opposed Boxer, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel SystemInjectionInjection. Electronic fuel injection
Bore x Stroke99 x 70.5 mm82.0 x 75.6 mm
Compression Ratio11.3:112.0:1
Cooling SystemAir/Oil cooledLiquid cooled
Fuel Consumption6.0 L/100 km / 16.6 km/l / 39.0 US mpg5.0 L/100 km / 20.1 km/l / 47 US mpg
Fuel InductionBosch fuel injectionElectronic intake injection
Fuel Reserve4 Litres / 1.05 US gal-
IgnitionBosch electronicKnock control and oxygen sensors
LubricationWet sump-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44 valves per cylinder
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity12 V, 14 Ah (special equipment: 12V, 19 Ah)12 V / 14 Ah, maintenance-free
Drivetrain
ClutchDry, single plateCable-operated multiplate-plate wet clutch
Final DriveShaftBelt
Final Drive Ratio-1:2.35
Gear Ratios1st 2.050 / 2nd 1.600 / 3rd 1.270 / 4th 1.040 / 5th 0.900 / 6th 0.8001st 2.46:1 / 2nd 1.75:1 / 3rd 1.38:1 / 4th 1.17:1 / 5th 1.04:1 / 6th 0.96:1
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Transmission / Drive6 Speed6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeThree section composite frame consisting of front & rear section, load bearing engineBridge-type aluminium frame
Suspension - FrontMotorrad Telelever, stanchion diameter 35mm, central strut, rebound damping adjustable.43mm Telescopic forks
Suspension - RearParalever, central strut, spring preload adjustable to continuously variable levels by mean of a hydraulic handwheel, rebound adjustable damping.Die-cast aluminium single sided swinging arm with rear wheal axle and eccentric adjustment, central spring stud , spring pre-loaded hydraulically adjustable to continuously variable levels by means of handwheel, rebound damping adjustable.
Steering Head Angle-64.2°
Trail-95 mm / 3.7 in
Wheel Travel - Front110 mm / 4.3 in140 mm / 5.5 in
Wheel Travel - Rear130 mm / 5.1 in140 mm / 5.5 in
Electronics
TachometerStandardStandard
Electrical Systems
Alternator-Three-phase alternator 400 W
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm320 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches12.6 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.9 inches10.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)276 mm265 mm
Brakes - Front2 x 320mm discs, 4 piston calipers2 x 320mm discs, 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle 276mm disc, 2 piston caliperSingle 265mm disc, 2 piston caliper
ABS-Optional (disengageable)
Rims - Front3.50 x 17"3.50 x 17
Rims - Rear5.00 x 17" (special equipment: 5.50 x 17")5.50 x 17
Tyres - Front120/70-ZR17120/70 ZR17
Tyres - Rear160/60-ZR18180/55 ZR17
Wheel Ratio - Rear1:2.81-
WheelsDie cast aluminium wheelsCast aluminium

Verdict

Winner on specs

2007 BMW F 800ST

The 2007 BMW F 800ST edges out the 2004 BMW R 1100S thanks to its lighter kerb weight, liquid cooling, standard ABS, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2004 BMW R 1100S - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 97 Nm vs 80 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
  • Lower seat height: 800 mm vs 820 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Larger displacement: 1085 cc vs 798 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.

2007 BMW F 800ST - Advantages

  • Lighter: 187 kg vs 236 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • Standard ABS: A meaningful safety advantage in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.
  • More rear wheel travel: 140 mm vs 130 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 140 mm vs 110 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2004 BMW R 1100S vs 2007 BMW F 800ST - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2004 BMW R 1100S and 2007 BMW F 800ST?
The 2004 BMW R 1100S uses Two cylinder boxer, while the 2007 BMW F 800ST is powered by Liquid-cooled parallel twin, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Which is lighter, the 2004 BMW R 1100S or the 2007 BMW F 800ST?
The 2007 BMW F 800ST is lighter at 187 kg compared to 236 kg for the 2004 BMW R 1100S - a difference of 49 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2004 BMW R 1100S or the 2007 BMW F 800ST?
The 2004 BMW R 1100S has the lower seat at 800 mm, making it more accessible. The 2007 BMW F 800ST sits higher at 820 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which has the larger fuel tank, the 2004 BMW R 1100S or the 2007 BMW F 800ST?
The 2004 BMW R 1100S has the larger tank at approximately 18 litres vs 16 litres for the 2007 BMW F 800ST. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 300-360 km vs 266-320 km between stops.
Does the 2004 BMW R 1100S or 2007 BMW F 800ST have ABS?
The 2007 BMW F 800ST is listed with ABS as standard. The 2004 BMW R 1100S does not list ABS. ABS provides a meaningful safety benefit in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.
Which should I buy, the 2004 BMW R 1100S or the 2007 BMW F 800ST?
Both are strong choices. The 2004 BMW R 1100S has the edge in higher torque and larger fuel tank, while the 2007 BMW F 800ST stands out for lighter kerb weight and liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All BMW R 1100S years All BMW F 800ST years
Build your own comparison →